Beecher Networks - Web Development, Hosting & Domains
Page 16 of 17 FirstFirst ... 614151617 LastLast
Results 301 to 320 of 340

Thread: Serbia v Rep of Ireland - Rajko Mitić Stadium, Belgrade (WCQ) Monday, 5th Sept. 2016

  1. #301
    Capped Player
    Joined
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,540
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7,498
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,698
    Thanked in
    2,681 Posts
    yeah, more expansive quotes from Dunne here

    http://www.independent.ie/sport/socc...-35031411.html

  2. #302
    Capped Player
    Joined
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,540
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7,498
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,698
    Thanked in
    2,681 Posts
    Here's Johnny Giles' take (apologies if already posted):

    http://www.independent.ie/sport/socc...-35030595.html

    MARTIN O’Neill thought that Ireland were magnificent to come away from Belgrade with a point. I didn’t. In fact, I would say the opposite.

    Against the worst international goalkeeper I have ever seen and a Serbian team which was very poor, Ireland only played when they had to.

    I would almost say that, in the context of this game, Jeff Hendrick’s early goal was the worst thing that could have happened.

    The team mindset after the goal went into reverse and I can only put that down to O’Neill.


    The players dropped off and handed possession over to Serbia, a team which in my eyes was decent going forward but awful in most other aspects of the game.

    They were there to be beaten and that was never more clearly illustrated than in the passage of play late in the game when Ireland were on the front foot and searching desperately for an equaliser.


    They got the goal and that was all about heart and commitment. As I’ve always said, that’s the default position for the vast majority of lads who pull on the green shirt.

    So why was the approach which secured an equaliser not valid throughout the game and where was the good football Ireland played in France?


    I cannot accept the excuse that the pitch made it difficult to play simply because Serbia managed to pass the ball when they were on the front foot, despite the mudbath.

    Fortunately, the Serbs were awful at the back when Ireland applied even the slightest pressure and that’s what I saw in the very first minutes of the game.


    But Ireland slipped into a pattern we have seen all too often under O’Neill, ceded ground to Serbia and lost two goals. It could have been more.

    I have always felt that the inconsistencies in O’Neill’s approach to managing Ireland have cost the team and that he almost stumbled upon a formula that works in France.


    It did take more than two years for him to reach the point where he felt able to pick the same players for consecutive games but better late than never was my attitude.

    Inconsistent selection policy leads to inconsistent performance and there is no argument against the proposition that Ireland have had very distinct highs and lows since he took over the job.


    This game against Serbia was a chance to bring the momentum from France into the World Cup qualifying campaign, but I saw very few of the good things that made Euro 2016 a qualified success for O’Neill and Ireland.

    Put it this way, this was more like the way the team played against Belgium than they the way they played against Italy.


    I saw very little evidence of lessons learned. Ireland continually gave the ball to Serbia after Hendrick scored and had they had a couple more players like Dusan Tadic and Filip Kostic, it could have been a very bad night indeed.

    With Austria winning in Georgia, Ireland would have been playing catch-up from the very start and that is never good.

    As it was, Serbia did manage to build up a head of steam which threatened to overwhelm Ireland at times and I do give great credit to the players for digging their way out of a bad position late in the game to get the equaliser.


    Even then, though, I thought the chance was there to go and win the game, but Ireland ended up hanging on for their lives and could have lost the game in the last few minutes but for heroics from Seamus Coleman.

    The manager sets the tone and that is true for a good team and a bad team. O’Neill sets the tone for Ireland.

    France killed the myth that Ireland doesn’t have footballers who can get the ball down and play good, controlled, positive football.


    Ireland do have players who can play but from what I saw in Belgrade, they weren’t encouraged to do just that.

    O’Neill said after the game that this point could prove vital when the final sums are done in Group D.

    That’s a more than glass half full approach. You could just as easily say that the two points dropped will be crucial in the end.


    This was a lucky point which should have been three.

  3. #303
    Capped Player OwlsFan's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Sadly viewing the houses that were once Milltown
    Posts
    10,393
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    875
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,373
    Thanked in
    778 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Stuttgart88 View Post
    I think anything can happen in this group too, but I think we need to pull our socks up. IRL v WAL could be a slugfest like Glasgow where we bring a more technical team down to our level.

    I think we're deluded if we think we can play to the standard that Wales played at key times during the Euros. Look at our respective performances versus Belgium. What would we have done with an early lead against Russia, who were poor but surely better than Serbia?

    Bale, Allen and Ramsey all played to a very high level last summer and all the rest did their jobs well too.
    Comparisons will only get you so far. Wales after all lost to Bosnia away (2-0) and could only draw 0-0 at home to them in the qualifiers. I don't think they're world beaters because they did well in the Euros as did Iceland. Didn't they lose to England ? They don't score a lot of goals. They have some average Championship players in their side (I know we have some as well). I'd say there is a toss of a coin between us. Unlike trips to Belgrade and other continental capitals, I don't think we'll go with an inferiority complex despite the performance against Scotland. Just as our performance against Italy and the first half against France is history, so too is the Welsh performance at the Euros. They are a team that stuttered to beat Andorra in qualifying. We can beat them and they can beat us. I wouldn't bet on either.
    Forget about the performance or entertainment. It's only the result that matters.

  4. #304
    Capped Player
    Joined
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Maígh Eó
    Posts
    16,378
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,602
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,040
    Thanked in
    846 Posts
    I agree with both Giles and Dunne to certain degree, I said after the Italy game, it was a second string side, who seemed to lack any real conviction, but we still played decent foobtall albeit we had a lot of time on the ball we normally wouldn't get. I said after France however I felt that we tired and had we not tired and some stupid individual mistakes, which for certain members are becoming more consistent, bar an inability or unwillingness to change things from management we could have really given France a good game of it over 90 mins rather than 50 mins. But I also agree with Dunne it that in wasn't that great of a Euros, and as usual people blew things out of proportion. That's said I still know we showed enough ability to play better than we did for 60-70 minutes against Serbia the last day.

    Address the ball retention - or if we insist on hoofing then lets actually practice it in training and find some good plays for it. Lets use it to our advantage. IF there is a wall of red in front then there must be space in behind that we can exploit.

    Owls I agree with most of what you have said, but they have shown an abillity to more often than not play football, play a good passing game and also to soak up pressure and counter with some precise and intricate passing. We can't do that. So they have a clear advantage over us.
    Last edited by paul_oshea; 08/09/2016 at 1:44 PM.
    I'm a bloke,I'm an ocker
    And I really love your knockers,I'm a labourer by day,
    I **** up all me pay,Watching footy on TV,
    Just feed me more VB,Just pour my beer,And get my smokes, And go away

  5. #305
    Biased against YOUR club pineapple stu's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2002
    Location
    In the long grass
    Posts
    38,099
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,663
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,893
    Thanked in
    3,197 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DeLorean View Post
    Well we weren't exactly a million miles from a quarter final against Iceland, throw a Bale into the equation and he could easily have made the difference.
    I think we were a mile away from the quarters actually. France completely outplayed us, particularly once they realised we weren't great and dispensed with Kanté (holding mid) and brought on Coman.

    And that's after we were arguably lucky enough to get through to the knock-outs in the first place, with Italy resting nine players against us.

    In the Euros, Belgium thumped us 3-0; Wales beat Belgium 3-1.

    We squeaked through as the fifth-best of the third-placed teams; Wales topped their group.

    Wales have a young improving team; we have an ageing team.

    We started the campaign with one of the worst performances I've ever seen from an Irish team, in which we were lucky to get a point when certainly all three were available. Wales started it with a comprehensive win. Granted, we were away to the third seeds and they were home to the bottom seeds, but still. I think we'd all be thrilled with a 4-0 win over Moldova later on.

    It's far too simplistic to say Bale is the only difference between the teams, and downright incorrect to say we'd be better than them if, say, Bale was injured/suspended.

    Though one "advantage" we do have is that we at least know their players well, and won't be that daunted by them.
    Last edited by pineapple stu; 08/09/2016 at 1:53 PM.

  6. Thanks From:


  7. #306
    Seasoned Pro jbyrne's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Baile Átha Cliath
    Posts
    3,464
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    642
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    838
    Thanked in
    536 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by pineapple stu View Post
    I think we were a mile away from the quarters actually. France completely outplayed us, particularly once they realised we weren't great and dispensed with Kanté (holding mid) and brought on Coman.

    And that's after we were arguably lucky enough to get through to the knock-outs in the first place, with Italy resting nine players against us.

    In the Euros, Belgium thumped us 3-0; Wales beat Belgium 3-1.

    We squeaked through as the fifth-best of the third-placed teams; Wales topped their group.

    Wales have a young improving team; we have an ageing team.

    We started the campaign with one of the worst performances I've ever seen from an Irish team, in which we were lucky to get a point when certainly all three were available. Wales started it with a comprehensive win. Granted, we were away to the third seeds and they were home to the bottom seeds, but still. I think we'd all be thrilled with a 4-0 win over Moldova later on.

    It's far too simplistic to say Bale is the only difference between the teams, and downright incorrect to say we'd be better than them if, say, Bale was injured/suspended.

    Though one "advantage" we do have is that we at least know their players well, and won't be that daunted by them.
    its all doom and gloom really. we should just give it all up

  8. #307
    Seasoned Pro shakermaker1982's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    4,399
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    149
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    318
    Thanked in
    214 Posts
    England battered Wales at the Euro's yet went home in the 2nd round. Wales went on to reach the semi finals. It was also a dog **** group when compared to the group we found ourselves in. Comparing the Belgian team we ended up playing at a tournament vs the team Wales played doesn't really tell you that much. Belgium were under pressure to deliver big time after their performance against Italy in the opening game.

    It was also nowhere near the opening 2004 qualifying game vs Russia in terms of ineptitude!!

    We got a point away from home in a tricky opener. Most people would have taken that a minute before kick off.
    Last edited by shakermaker1982; 08/09/2016 at 5:09 PM.

  9. #308
    Capped Player SkStu's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    13,932
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,354
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,782
    Thanked in
    2,612 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by OwlsFan View Post
    I am not sure why you think that our best hope is a play off position. I think we have as good a chance of securing the top spot as any of the other main contenders. Not long ago we scoffed at winning the Celtic Cup or whatever it was called against opposition such as Wales. Now we seem to fear them. We are equal to if not better than them (Bale aside). Serbia we have a nudge on after the away draw and Austria. We were better than them at home and they outplayed us away in the last campaign under Trap when the team was starting to implode. I would be equally hopeful as the other nations are of a top spot. Certainly not looking at a play off spot at this stage.

    Thus I don't think it is time "to blood new players" for the future. Pick your best team and if the new players are better than what's there, play them but not as an experiment for some future campaign. World Cups come around only every 4 years and are precious and should never be written off until mathematically impossible to qualify. Then you blood new players but not before.
    We'll have to agree to disagree then OF. I dont think that we are aiming realistically for first place. We have never finished first in a qualifying campaign and i dont see any reason to suggest we should be setting those targets this time. We have to aim for second place and a playoff game to qualify in all reality. Wales and Austria are better than us. Serbia are about the same.

    Now, to be clear, im not saying we need to throw the baby out with the bath water and completely overhaul the starting 11 as well as the entire squad - what im saying is that it would be a low risk strategy to bring in 5-7 of our younger, more promising players and still maintain our core 11-15 players. This doesnt impact our ability to aim for 2nd in any way - and it really, in my opinion, wouldnt materially impact our ability to aim for first if that was the target you feel should be set.

    I guess i am frustrated at seeing the same old same old from Irish managers from campaign to campaign. We have young players performing very well at Championship and League 1 level and they need to be blooded sooner rather than later. Why wait until we can't qualify? As many say it is very difficult to bring in and blood new players part way through a campaign even when qualification is not possible.

    I dont know if MON, Keano and Delaney sit down before a campaign and set minimum targets (if they dont they should) but those targets should include a goal to bring in any promising young players. You think we are selecting the best squad of players, i think there are 5-7 players who are dead wood and it would make no difference to our goals if we were to replace them and do some planning for the future. I dont think what i am saying is off the wall in that regard.

  10. #309
    Capped Player DeLorean's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Hill Valley
    Posts
    10,894
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,418
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,280
    Thanked in
    2,081 Posts
    Sorry about the multi-quoting but you made so many points, and I think they're very selective in what you're choosing to deem relevant and choosing to omit.

    Quote Originally Posted by pineapple stu View Post
    I think we were a mile away from the quarters actually. France completely outplayed us, particularly once they realised we weren't great and dispensed with Kanté (holding mid) and brought on Coman.
    We lost by a goal, one of which resulted from a wrong decision when we should have had a corner. McClean had a brilliant opportunity to set up Murphy for an equaliser after we went behind (and before we went down to ten men, I think?). France were much, much better in the second half but we weren't miles away at all. You know what they always say about one goal leads! Plus we could have easily gone two ahead in that first half the way it developed. If we had somebody like Bale he could easily have made the difference, which was what you were disputing initially. We weren't that far away even without him, despite being comprehensively outplayed in the second half when fatigue was a massive factor.

    We didn't deserve to beat France or anything, don't get me wrong, but we could have with a break or two (or maybe even a level playing field with regards the gaps between our last group game compared to theirs).


    Quote Originally Posted by pineapple stu View Post
    And that's after we were arguably lucky enough to get through to the knock-outs in the first place, with Italy resting nine players against us.
    We were arguably unlucky not to beat Sweden. We should have had a penalty at 0-0 against Belgium, all ifs and buts. We got through because we got enough points to get through, however they came about. Italy were still a good side, and arguably better than anything Wales played in their group, bar maybe England, who they deservedly lost to.


    Quote Originally Posted by pineapple stu View Post
    In the Euros, Belgium thumped us 3-0; Wales beat Belgium 3-1.
    Before the Euros, Bosnia beat Wales 2-0, we beat Bosnia 2-0. We beat Germany, they drew with Israel. We could do this forever!


    Quote Originally Posted by pineapple stu View Post
    We squeaked through as the fifth-best of the third-placed teams; Wales topped their group.
    We were the second best of the third placed teams actually, if we were fifth best we'd have been knocked out. Anyway, Portugal only qualified as third best of the third placed teams so hardly an exact science, as we clearly weren't better than the eventual champions. I would also suggest we had a significantly tougher group but obviously Wales had to play Belgium eventually as well.


    Quote Originally Posted by pineapple stu View Post
    Wales have a young improving team; we have an ageing team.
    The age profile of our team could change fairly dramatically as the campaign progresses. I could see the likes of Duffy becoming ever present and maybe Clark working his way back in. McCarthy will probably replace Whelan full time. Those changes alone would reduce the average age significantly. We'll see how it develops but we may have predominantly players in their prime or younger as it goes on I think, along with two or three warhorses.


    Quote Originally Posted by pineapple stu View Post
    We started the campaign with one of the worst performances I've ever seen from an Irish team, in which we were lucky to get a point when certainly all three were available. Wales started it with a comprehensive win. Granted, we were away to the third seeds and they were home to the bottom seeds, but still. I think we'd all be thrilled with a 4-0 win over Moldova later on.
    Incomparable really. I'd still take our start over theirs. We might not beat Moldova 4-0, but we will beat them. I reckon Wales would be pretty satisfied with a draw in Serbia if it was offered now.


    Quote Originally Posted by pineapple stu View Post
    It's far too simplistic to say Bale is the only difference between the teams, and downright incorrect to say we'd be better than them if, say, Bale was injured/suspended.
    Most of what you have said above is far more simplistic I think. I agree with you overall though outside of debating some of the points. The difference Bale makes to Wales is immeasurable though... would they have even qualified for the Euros without him?... highly doubtful. They've actually been quite blessed that despite all his injuries it hasn't impacted on them over the past couple of years.


    Quote Originally Posted by pineapple stu View Post
    Though one "advantage" we do have is that we at least know their players well, and won't be that daunted by them.
    I don't think we have any obvious advantages. I agree that they are better than us right now, no doubt about it really in my mind. But all to play for!
    Last edited by DeLorean; 08/09/2016 at 3:16 PM.

  11. #310
    Biased against YOUR club pineapple stu's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2002
    Location
    In the long grass
    Posts
    38,099
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,663
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,893
    Thanked in
    3,197 Posts
    Let's keep this simple.

    We are not comparable to, or maybe better then, Wales without Bale. The easiest way to see this is to watch the two teams play football.

    To argue this case is pure fantasy.

    That doesn't mean, as jbyrne has somehow concluded, that I reckon we should all pack it in. But a bit of realism wouldn't be any harm.

  12. #311
    Reserves
    Joined
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    859
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    71
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    244
    Thanked in
    148 Posts
    This Irish team does not have a Ronnie Whelan or Liam Brady, a Johnny Giles or Roy Keane that is a world class midfielder who can control the tempo of a game. It's crazy to think of the world class midfielders that we used to have, but like with Scotland in the past, we probably punched well above our weight in producing top players.

    We do have a very decent midfield in my opinion though. Hendrick has it in his locker to be a very good player, Arter is a good premiership player who could be very good in the next few years and McCarthy for all his faults is certainly a decent player. Wes is Wes and while he isn't world class, he certainly has the ability to be a standout player against Serbia, Austria or Wales. If Brady plays in midfield, he is potentially top class.

    I agree with Giles. There is a mindset in this Irish team that means that while we are never beaten against any team, we are never comfortable either - how many of the Irish team really believe that they could go to Austria or Wales and win. 1 or 2 at a push I reckon - Brady and Hendrick would be those two. Most would take the solid draw and feel that we could beat them in Dublin. In contrast, our three rivals would see the group for what it is - 4 teams of even enough ability who would be poor 2nd seed to average 3rd seed standard in most normal situations. In saying that, I do feel the Serbs have a number of top players, Austria have Alaba and Bale is one of the best players in the world.

    This group is there for the taking. Look at Sweden. They have France, Holland and even Bulgaria to contend with. There are other groups with 3-4 very good teams. This is by no means the poorest group, but it is far far from being the hardest.

    The mindset can't be to get a playoff. It has to be to go into every game believing that you can win every game. I would be concerned that MON's attitude will shoot us in the foot throughout the campaign. I could see us remaining unbeaten and finishing 2nd or 3rd in the group.

    Anyhow, for what it's worth;

    Ireland 1 Georgia 0 (Ireland scrape it with a bit of luck. Georgia control the tempo of the game with some lovely football and bemoan lacking a bit of nous which cost them against Austria).
    Moldova 1 Ireland 3 (Ireland dominant in this game with a very good performance)
    Austria 1 Ireland 1 (Ireland score early on, but sit back and concede. We leave fortunate with the draw).
    Republic of Ireland 1 Wales 1 (a good entertaining draw).
    Republic of Ireland 2 Austria 1 (Ireland produce their best performance of the campaign).
    Georgia 0 Ireland 0 (Georgia finally pick up points against a poor Ireland).
    Rep of Ireland 1 Serbia 1 (Serbia run the show and good Irish luck prevents them from winning comfortably. Ireland escape with a draw).
    Rep of Ireland 3 Moldova 0 (routine victory for Ireland)
    Wales 1 Ireland 1 (another derby draw)

    By my reckoning, we will get our usual gold standard Irish 18 points!!Depending on how the group pans out, that would probably get us into the playoff. I have this nasty feeling that Georgia could be an Armenia over the course of it, hopefully we won't be the ones to suffer.

  13. #312
    Capped Player
    Joined
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Maígh Eó
    Posts
    16,378
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,602
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,040
    Thanked in
    846 Posts
    "Most people who have taken that a minute before kick off. "

    Shaker, thats possibly a fair argument, and normally realistic against opposition we are familiar against, but we didn't really know what Seriba were like. We should be able adapt our play, our tactics, our fromation and our players depending on how the game unfolds in front of us. The game is evolvable and transpires to be during the course of a match, we should also evolve to use it to achieve our best possible outcome. In this sense playing a bit of pall pressuring their back four and keeper and going for the win, not settlings on a 1-0 hope we miraculously pull through.

    Lots on here have said I'd have taken that before kick off. I dont understand why that is used as a defence in the discussion. It means nothing, its about context.
    I'm a bloke,I'm an ocker
    And I really love your knockers,I'm a labourer by day,
    I **** up all me pay,Watching footy on TV,
    Just feed me more VB,Just pour my beer,And get my smokes, And go away

  14. Thanks From:


  15. #313
    Capped Player DeLorean's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Hill Valley
    Posts
    10,894
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,418
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,280
    Thanked in
    2,081 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by pineapple stu View Post
    We are not comparable to, or maybe better then, Wales without Bale. The easiest way to see this is to watch the two teams play football.
    They clearly play better football, but do you think they would have qualified for the Euros without him? I think it's a slightly relevant question seeing as we did qualify without him!

  16. #314
    Biased against YOUR club pineapple stu's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2002
    Location
    In the long grass
    Posts
    38,099
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,663
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,893
    Thanked in
    3,197 Posts
    I agree this isn't a bad group at all. Wales have Bale, but they're still the top seeds everyone wanted. Austria had a poor Euros, and Serbia seem to be a basketcase of a team (even according to Serbians I know)

    But there's no way on earth we're going to go through the group unbeaten.

  17. #315
    Biased against YOUR club pineapple stu's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2002
    Location
    In the long grass
    Posts
    38,099
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,663
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,893
    Thanked in
    3,197 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DeLorean View Post
    They clearly play better football, but do you think they would have qualified for the Euros without him? I think it's a slightly relevant question seeing as we did qualify without him!
    Wales qualified over a year ago. It's two years since Bale was dragging Wales to a win on a God-awful pitch in Andorra.

    I think their team has come on in leaps and bounds since then. They're playing decent football, they've a young team with quality players and a very solid defence, and while I can acknowledge that they quite possibly wouldn't have qualified without Bale - you'd imagine play-offs at best - that was 12 months ago. I think the Euros has done them the power of good, and we're still playing dire defensive ****e that means we could well take a tanking some game.

  18. #316
    Capped Player DeLorean's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Hill Valley
    Posts
    10,894
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,418
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,280
    Thanked in
    2,081 Posts
    Okay, so you think Wales have improved an awful lot since qualifying. Fair enough, I don't really see that despite watching most of their games over that time. Other players upped their game a little in France but I'd put that down to tournament football more than anything. He scored two and set up one the other night, and his shot led to the corner from which the other goal was scored. It's more of the same I think. He's involved in practically everything good that they do in an attacking sense. It would be interesting to see them over a few games without him actually.

  19. #317
    Capped Player SkStu's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    13,932
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,354
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,782
    Thanked in
    2,612 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by paul_oshea View Post
    "Most people who have taken that a minute before kick off. "

    Shaker, thats possibly a fair argument, and normally realistic against opposition we are familiar against, but we didn't really know what Seriba were like. We should be able adapt our play, our tactics, our fromation and our players depending on how the game unfolds in front of us. The game is evolvable and transpires to be during the course of a match, we should also evolve to use it to achieve our best possible outcome. In this sense playing a bit of pall pressuring their back four and keeper and going for the win, not settlings on a 1-0 hope we miraculously pull through.

    Lots on here have said I'd have taken that before kick off. I dont understand why that is used as a defence in the discussion. It means nothing, its about context.
    Agree with this. The game script should determine what you are happy with, not any pre-game retrospective. We didnt perform against a poor Serbian team until we went behind and then showed what we could do. It was really disappointing - a lost opportunity to make a statement of intent to the rest of the group.

    In reality, it applies to tournament performances too. If you sh!t the bed and lose a winnable game in the 2nd round then there is scant comfort received in saying "ah well, we would have taken a second round appearance". It should be no defence or distraction of a terrible performance either. Its the 90 minutes that matter.

  20. Thanks From:


  21. #318
    Capped Player DeLorean's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Hill Valley
    Posts
    10,894
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,418
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,280
    Thanked in
    2,081 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by paul_oshea View Post
    Lots on here have said I'd have taken that before kick off. I dont understand why that is used as a defence in the discussion. It means nothing, its about context.
    It's not a defence, the performance was dreadful, everybody accepts that.

  22. #319
    Biased against YOUR club pineapple stu's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2002
    Location
    In the long grass
    Posts
    38,099
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,663
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,893
    Thanked in
    3,197 Posts
    I agree Bale is an exceptional player at the heart of a lot they do. To score 7 of Wales' 11 goals in the last qualifying says a lot.

    But they've a very solid defence, which Bale isn't really a part of. And I think it's fair to say we've had more than our share of luck in recent games - Monday night an obvious example, but even the Germany game at home we were appalling for the first half, and if Germany hadn't been so lax in front of goal, the game would have been over by half-time.

    It worries me that our luck has to change soon.

  23. #320
    Capped Player DeLorean's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Hill Valley
    Posts
    10,894
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,418
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,280
    Thanked in
    2,081 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by pineapple stu View Post
    I agree Bale is an exceptional player at the heart of a lot they do. To score 7 of Wales' 11 goals in the last qualifying says a lot.
    And of the four he didn't score, he assisted two and was directly involved in another. I'm not saying that to labour the point though, but basically Wales would have only scored one goal without him.

    You're right to be worried about our luck changing, but I'd be more hopeful that our performances might improve to the point that we're not as reliant on luck. Probably wishful thinking though.

Page 16 of 17 FirstFirst ... 614151617 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. LOI fixtures - Friday 22nd Sept to Monday 25th Sept
    By ToberonaTornado in forum Premier & First Divisions
    Replies: 118
    Last Post: 27/09/2017, 3:55 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09/08/2017, 11:54 PM
  3. Replies: 505
    Last Post: 13/09/2016, 9:50 AM
  4. Replies: 502
    Last Post: 19/05/2016, 10:44 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 29/07/2015, 11:42 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •