Full-time football is not the problem.
Paying people wages that they can't afford is the problem.
It is possible to have a full-time club where you pay people wages you can afford. It's what all other businesses with full-time employees seem to have no problems doing.
Ergo - it's not full-time football that's the problem. It's financial stupidity.
What can the FAI do to stop clubs that seem deteremined to make crazy decisions ? The FAI don't run the clubs. Those who do need to take more responsibility. And others need to stop looking to the FAI to act like the UN all the time.
Last edited by dcfcsteve; 26/10/2009 at 12:25 AM.
I think youd struggle to find another business with the income of an LOI club that could sustain 20 or so full time staff.
With the current levels of income full time football is not sustainable imo. A mixture of full time and part time similar to Rovers, sure. But the income streams are too volatile to be risking your clubs future on paying full time players 52 weeks a year when crowds can nosedive after a few poor games. Particularly in the current climate when all revenue streams, particularly sponsorship, are way down.
You claimed full time football isn't the problem. Id consider full time football to be a full team of full timers, on this grounds I wouldn't consider Shamrock Rovers to be full time.
As I said, I don't think full time football as defined above, is feasible at the moment for LOI clubs, based on income streams, therefore trying to be fulltime IS the problem.
If clubs stick to wages they could afford then Im sure they could have some full time players, but they wouldnt be a full time club
If a club is full time they have to offer decent wages. That's the entire point of a player going full time.
At the IFA AGM in June it was confirmed that Linfield received circa £800,000 for last season.
In your last financial year you spent circa £655,000. How you decide to structure your wages is of little argument. More players on less money or Less players on more money. In LOI terms that wage bill might see like peanuts but in comparison to the rest of the IL it is a fortune.
Oxford United Stars applied for the Championship this season and Derry City Council agreed to a groundshare at Brandywell but would only give them a 1 year lease. They were refused necessary license on basis that they needed to posess a minimum 3 year lease. DCC's viewpoint is that no team will get a longer lease so it's fair to assume that means Derry City too and therefore no chance of a license for Irish League?
Oxford were refused entry to the IL as Derry City Council will only lease the brandywell to them (and us) one year at a time.
Therefore surely the same rules would apply to Derry City.
And just to add my tuppence worth, NO THANKS, I'd rather watch Derry in the 'A' League.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/foot...sh/8325118.stm
I think Derry City may have little option but go back to the IL.
Neale Fenn on retiring: 'I think once you finish you might as well finish rather than making all sorts of comebacks.'
I really don't see why people are relating massive over spending and what jurisdiction they play in.
#NeverStopNotGivingUp
The IFA and Linfield obviously run their two financial years at different times. For instance. Linfield runs from the 1st January until 31st December.
On our finance sheet we got no where near 800k but again that is probably because of the financial year Linfield work from.
The Hallion Battalion Molests football.:D
I'd say it would be cheaper to go to Coleraine, Ballymena, Dungannon, Limavady, Belfast, Lurgan, Portadown, Newry than to go to Galway, Cork, Dublin etc etc.
Costs would be so much less than the LOI.
Personally I don't think DCFC will ever be in the IL again because it would be too much of a comedown for them after years of DCFC looking down their noses on the IL
The Hallion Battalion Molests football.:D
Bookmarks