Whats the story?
Volunatarily banned?
Printable View
Whats the story?
Volunatarily banned?
Hah! "Voluntarily banned". One can only assume an indignant tantrum was thrown after some semi-professional goading from dahamsta.
Watch out for micls becoming a touch more articulate and outspoken!
He asked for it, literally. Study. I'd normally tell him to cop himself on and just logout, but he does seem to be an addict. :)
He disagreed with everything
Surely Gavin has the willpower to refrain from logging on, and doesn't need this kind of authoritarianism to regulate his habits? :o
How is it authoritarian if he asked?
I liked him. Unlike most people round here he had a pair. Constantly banning anyone with a different point of view just leads to bland consensus on most threads.
Not very clear from this thread....
Ummm - it's him! Therefore it's not authoritarian. :rolleyes:
Ye all have a vote lads. I'm just minding them for ye.
I can't believe I'm arguing over such a dumb thing, but........
He has asked for a ban, yes. dahamsta is the one doing the banning, hence 'asserting his authority' over Gavin.
Just as when a rabidly authoritarian fascist candidate gets elected, it's still authoritarianism, in spite of the fact that he may have been elected on that promise.
Now for God's sake let's stop bickering over this. :D
its like reading your own obituary!
and getting to reply! :DNo I didn't!Damn you and your blatant stealing of my witty comeback remarkThey should make coffee with added ritalinI sense a logical flaw in your argument.We're woeful, what are you on?Quote:
They could do no wrong in his eyes, even though they are crap like.
Bravo! :D
Ah nuts, he's back.
Haha yeah right, I'd say you're loving having your own dedicated thread :p