Is it sacrilege to question Paul Cook's tactics?

Afraid tonight raised some questions for me. Firstly, where did he get the notion that you can get away with a right footed player playing at left back and what is the problem with Foyzer. I have seen Foy fat and thin (well, less fat) and I can state with conviction that neither of the two balls which caused the Waterford goals would have got into th e box if he were playing. Secondly, why did he leave Raf on the field so long when he was quite clearly having an absolute mare and was more of a danger to his own team than to Waterford. Events showed that if Brian cash was on long enough, he could have won it for us.
Fair play to waterford - they hung in there and although we should have been out of sight when they scored their second gaol, we weren't and that's that. In Mark kavanagh they had the best player on the field by a country mile.
No harm to the lads - they left it all out on the field and penos are lotto anyway.
It could be worse - it could have been Bohs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by avvenalaf

In Mark kavanagh they had the best player on the field by a country mile.

---

You didn't notice O'Grady then?:confused:

As for Foy, Cook has a personal problem with him but I agree he should be starting. Put it aside Cookie and play him, we need him!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sligoman

You didn't notice O'Grady then?:confused:

As for Foy, Cook has a personal problem with him but I agree he should be starting. Put it aside Cookie and play him, we need him!

---

AFAIK there great mates?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Red&White Rover

AFAIK there great mates?

---

Not what I heard

have to agree about ventre and foyzer. i don't like ventre as a player at all. he's prob a decent rb but he's all over the shop at lb.if only foyzer wud drop some weight we'd be sorted but i'd still start him v galway. his positioning, been left sided etc etc make up for the advantages of danny not being fat and then foyzer's deliveries fom set piece puts him way ahead of danny IMO. we never score from set pieces like we did last year&that's because we've no foyzer. i might be proved wrong but i'd like to see foyzer start a game

even if there great mates, its a totally different thing on the pitch

Well Ventre is suspended for Friday so if he doesn't start Foyzer then their is something seriously wrong!

he'll start Raff left back, cash on the right, thats it

Sligoman, I did notice Conor - he was outstanding but Kavanagh was carrying a full team on his back.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by avvenalaf

Sligoman, I did notice Conor - he was outstanding but Kavanagh was carrying a full team on his back.

---

which fella was he? what number? 8?

he's not playing foyzer because he's making no effort to lose weight.he has no interest in putting in the extra bit of effort he needs to put in...i would start him if your going by who is our best left back but he has to show that he wants to play and earn his place in the team and at the minute he's not doing that.

cant get on to the manager....luck didnt go our way
Ventre did ok, they tried very hard
The subs, Manson and Cash had an impact, beating their men and looking good

It was penos after all

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Red4Eva;

we never score from set pieces like we did last year

---

:confused::confused::confused:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fivesilver

:confused::confused::confused:

---

i mean from corners and frees into the box not shots on goal from faz which he's absolutely brilliant at but his frees from wide areas are pretty poor.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by feo123

he'll start Raff left back, cash on the right, thats it

---

Would he not play Meredith seeing as he will be eligible after so long

Maybe a bit early in the morning but "The subs, Manson and Cash had an impact, beating their men and looking good

Yeah both had an impact.Cash's was positive but Manson's wasnt.
He played right in front of us in the blue stand for extra time and some of his play was atrocious.He passed the buck too many times pointing at areas for Ventre to mark instaed of going it himself, he didnt even mark his own man, left thrower unmarked and pulled out of tackles etc......

When he stood up for the peno the whole ground know he was going to miss .
Never like to be critical of our own players but lets call a spade a spade.He is simply not good enough.

As for questioning Cooke lets not get carried away.We could be up in the showgrounds still and we wouldnt score.I have never seen a game like it you sort of knew when we missed the extra time chances it wasn't going to be our day.Cookey has said we rode our luck in a lot of games and it simply ran out last night.Still in shock and many more miles of debate to get form last night.
So we move on and try and keep our league performance going.
It will be hard to pick the lads up but wallowing in it will not help us beat Galway on Friday.We played some good football last night, was a great game,great crowd and no reason why we cannot continue where we left off against Bray.Onward and upwards

I don’t think we should be too critical of anyone last night. After a poor enough first half the game turned into a great entertaining cup tie witnessed by a large crowd.

Our luck certainly deserted us last night and after witnessing the types of chances we had last night, I sensed that it wasn’t going to be our night. Although, they gave us one glimmer of hope when we pulled the penalty shoot out back to 2 all.

In defence this season we have being at times unsteady and always likely to concede in most games. There seems very little composure and we seem happy to swipe at the ball just to get it out of the box. Strangely though, this season has seen the emergence of Coleman, a new defensive hero in Peers and a huge improvement in Jamie (although he has a bit to go to totally convince me). Left back is certainly our problem area, as is communication between Brushy and his defence. Will our new signings be the answer? Time will tell.

I don’t think we should feel too disappointed after last night’s entertainment. We are still in a good position in the league and Europe is a possibility. If you had offered that at the start of the season we would all have taken it. We have received quite a bit of good profile this season and Rovers are recognised as one of the most entertaining teams in the league, with players signed for next season that are coveted by so called “bigger clubs”.

Last night wasn’t our night, but the season may yet leave us smiling.

All the usual 'look forward' 'not our night' 'unlucky' sh ite being wheeled out when we are looking at a situation where we should have beaten Waterford off the field. The reality is that by playing a right footed player at full back we handed an area of the pitch to the opposition where they could hurt us. Did anyone not see the interview Gareth Cronin gave TV3 after we beat them down there when he was livid at the fact that his team did not carry out his instructions to target Ventre for that very reason.
The reality is we are out of a competition which we were second favourites to win - beaten at home by a side fighting relegation and if we don't admit why we were beaten then we will be beaten again. What's the point in getting onto Stephen Manson - he'a an easy taget and after all he was put on.
I don't want to put out major criticism when the season has gone so well from a disastrous opening but the coffee is brewing whenever you want to wake up, guys. Smell it.
Onwards and upwards by all means but with lessons learned.

There is no football played at the back. Its all simply get it the frig out of there as quickly as possibe. This leads to conceding possession and Waterford had a fair bit of it last night. I dont think McKenzie and Ventre have the ability to play it from here anyway so there is no proper balance. Hopefully these positions will be sorted for next season. Ventre is a liability at left full, not his natural position I know but even when attacking with the ball last night, he ended up going back to his own half and passing back to Brush.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by avvenalaf

The reality is we are out of a competition which we were second favourites to win

---

Dont know who we were 2nd favourites with? We were 5th favourites with any bookies I checked.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by avvenalaf

All the usual 'look forward' 'not our night' 'unlucky' sh ite being wheeled out when we are looking at a situation where we should have beaten Waterford off the field. The reality is that by playing a right footed player at full back we handed an area of the pitch to the opposition where they could hurt us. Did anyone not see the interview Gareth Cronin gave TV3 after we beat them down there when he was livid at the fact that his team did not carry out his instructions to target Ventre for that very reason.
The reality is we are out of a competition which we were second favourites to win - beaten at home by a side fighting relegation and if we don't admit why we were beaten then we will be beaten again. What's the point in getting onto Stephen Manson - he'a an easy taget and after all he was put on.
I don't want to put out major criticism when the season has gone so well from a disastrous opening but the coffee is brewing whenever you want to wake up, guys. Smell it.
Onwards and upwards by all means but with lessons learned.

---

Ventre or Foy were the only likely candidates for the left back position, (Raf perhaps, but he too is right footed). In my opinion these candidates are not good enough. Hence, calling it a problem area. An area where Cook is aware there is a problem.

We had chances that should have been taken, shots cleared off the line and also hit the woodwork. You can call it unlucky or call it poor play. One of these chances fell to Brian Cash, who according to an earlier post “could have won it for us”.

We may have been playing a side fighting relegation, but there isn’t that much of a gap in the league to suggest that any game is a certainty. Waterford battled to earn the win, and in one-off games battling can and does often pay.

The reaction to last night seems far too critical to me. Rovers had a right good go, played some good stuff at times, failed to take chances, and eventually lost out to the lottery that is penalty kicks

Any spectators last night, visiting for the first time, despite the result, just may say to themselves, “that was a good, entertaining nights out, I’ll think I’ll come again”. That is just me taking a positive out of a disappointing result

Lose much, then, SM ??

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by showgies

Ventre or Foy were the only likely candidates for the left back position, (Raf perhaps, but he too is right footed). In my opinion these candidates are not good enough. Hence, calling it a problem area. An area where Cook is aware there is a problem.

---

we have just signed meredith who can play left back, hence it is no longer a problem area. it was clear to everybody that ventre was getting raped all night long and i would have taken him off ahead of raf. the two lads in the middle didnt have their best nights either, waterford looked a threat everytime they got near our box. peers obviously just had an off night but like others, i dont know why but im not yet convinvced about mckenzie

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rovers fan

we have just signed meredith who can play left back, hence it is no longer a problem area

---

Ya can't say it's not a problem area anymore when we've never saw Meredith playing yet. He could be crap for all we know but time will tell.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sligoman

Ya can't say it's not a problem area anymore when we've never saw Meredith playing yet. He could be crap for all we know but time will tell.

---

we have signed somebody to rectify the problem. we have a recognised left back who isnt a fat b'sterd! Cook obviously feels he can do the job, otherwise he wouldnt have signed him

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rovers fan

we have signed somebody to rectify the problem. we have a recognised left back who isnt a fat b'sterd! Cook obviously feels he can do the job, otherwise he wouldnt have signed him

---

I've heard otherwise, like I said, time will tell.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by roversforever

he's not playing foyzer because he's making no effort to lose weight.

---

Not Ture, according to Paul Cook

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by roversforever

he has no interest in putting in the extra bit of effort he needs to put in...

---

Not Ture, according to Paul Cook

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by roversforever

i would start him if your going by who is our best left back but he has to show that he wants to play and earn his place in the team and at the minute he's not doing that.

---

are you taking training sessions, how do you know what sort of effort Foy is putting in at training?

These are not statements, these are questions.

dont turn into a negative bitching shower of fans over a lose on penalties...Let dust settle....

In fairness to Foy, he always seems to give 100% on the pitch in my opinion. Obviously we can't speak for what he's like in training as we're not there.

iv heard he trains very hard


Its a disgrace that Rovers fans are using Manson as a scapegoat and making up a bebo page to 'get him out'. Hes not a bad lad, didnt mean to miss a peranlty and is obviously low in confidence...Give him and the rest a break

there always has to be one player that rovers 'fans' give out about, no matter what he does. faz, choice (to a lesser extent) and now manson

again feo you go with this "fans" thing. you dont have the monopoly on being a fan, your not rovers only fan either. you have to realise, fans care more about the club than the majority of players can ever dream of. they will be there for ever for the club,not just a few years or even a career but forever.as i have said before, when you pay money to watch the team you love, the team that, if they lose , ur sick for a week, they win, your **** of the walk for a week, you have the right to criticise whoever you think isnt giving 100% to YOUR club. you feel the need to defend almost everything about the players, and by all means thats your perogotive, but dont be-little others just becasue they havnt got your patience.:ball:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by biscuit

again feo you go with this "fans" thing. you dont have the monopoly on being a fan, your not rovers only fan either. you have to realise, fans care more about the club than the majority of players can ever dream of. they will be there for ever for the club,not just a few years or even a career but forever.as i have said before, when you pay money to watch the team you love, the team that, if they lose , ur sick for a week, they win, your **** of the walk for a week, you have the right to criticise whoever you think isnt giving 100% to YOUR club. you feel the need to defend almost everything about the players, and by all means thats your perogotive, but dont be-little others just becasue they havnt got your patience.:ball:

---

very good post.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by biscuit

again feo you go with this "fans" thing. you dont have the monopoly on being a fan, your not rovers only fan either. you have to realise, fans care more about the club than the majority of players can ever dream of. they will be there for ever for the club,not just a few years or even a career but forever.as i have said before, when you pay money to watch the team you love, the team that, if they lose , ur sick for a week, they win, your **** of the walk for a week, you have the right to criticise whoever you think isnt giving 100% to YOUR club. you feel the need to defend almost everything about the players, and by all means thats your perogotive, but dont be-little others just becasue they havnt got your patience.:ball:

---

good post, but do you think fans should roar abuse at players on the pitch like one did to Manson last night? Thats not exactly fair critisim, we all have our opinions, but no need to call a lad a 'gaylord' (for all fans and the player himself to hear) the minute he steps onto the pitch..

tell me thats right?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shedzer

good post, but do you think fans should roar abuse at players on the pitch like one did to Manson last night? Thats not exactly fair critisim, we all have our opinions, but no need to call a lad a 'gaylord' (for all fans and the player himself to hear) the minute he steps onto the pitch..

tell me thats right?

---

Yes that is right.
But setting up a site to get rid of the lad is just idiotic.

well hopefully from my post you dont actually think that id say that!;)
to the contrary Id encourage,especially if I saw him really grabing things by the scruf of the nek!but usually i just want to grab HIM by the scruff of the neck and shake the fecker,let him know what it means to us and maybe he might realise! na but really, shouting derogatory names like gaylord etc is just plain stupid, and if i heard someone say it id tell him to shut his gob r get a "4 lights kiss;)". bt there is nothing wrong with a " come on to **** manson, get your arse in gear you lazy ...." i dont think so anyway.its what lads like him need!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Midgit

Yes that is right.
But setting up a site to get rid of the lad is just idiotic.

---

so your all for using derogatory terms towards our own players?
:rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Midgit

Yes that is right.
But setting up a site to get rid of the lad is just idiotic.

---

funny how the minute we get onto midgit bou it, the site is deleted! suppose you'll tell me now that you didnt mail him on bebo abusing him aswell?:rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by feo123

funny how the minute we get onto midgit bou it, the site is deleted! suppose you'll tell me now that you didnt mail him on bebo abusing him aswell?:rolleyes:

---

Are you for real???
Coming from the same person who was telling me to say somthing to his face on bebo???
Abusing him??? Who told you that???

what did you say?