NI boss targets Republic's Gibson

Northern Ireland boss Nigel Worthington is trying to persuade Manchester United prospect Darron Gibson to switch allegiance from the Republic.

The 19-year-old, who was born in Londonderry, is currently at the centre of a dispute between the two countries.

Gibson represented Northern Ireland at Under-16 level but then opted for the Republic as he has an Irish passport.

"I have spoken to him and emphasised how much I want him to be involved with Northern Ireland," said Worthington.

The Northern Ireland manager told the Sunday Life he felt the teenager should play for the country of his birth.

"I want him involved with Northern Ireland and it is a situation which has to be resolved."

Gibson has not played for the Repubilc of Ireland at senior level although he was a non-playnig substitute for a Euro 2008 qualifier against San Marino.
The Irish FA, which governs football in Northrn Ireland, is awaiting a Fifa ruling on Gibson's eligibility.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/foot...ls/6953708.stm

Hands off Nigel!

Saw Gibson play pre season and he was head and shoulders above most of the other players on the pitch. Apparently Fergie rates him hightly.He is a big lad with two good feet and is no doubt one for the future, ours that is not NI.

Worthington has already approached Darron two or three times.
He is in the u21 squad for the game against Germany. He has declared that it is his dream to play for Ireland.
I wonder why would Worthington be so crass as to be publically quoted like this.
It's a bit like a spineless jilted partner making an ass of himself - "please please come back".

SSSSsssshhhhh!!! You'll wake EalingGreen.

He'll probbly go on loan before the end of August. I'd defo like to see more of him.

Stan should select him for the squad to play Denmark.

Worthington is just making an ass of himself. If he really beleived that Darron had any interest in playing for the North, would he go running to the media?

How many times do these idiots need to be told.

As far as i'm aware, there were two, two minute phone conversations that were basically 'thanks, but no thanks'.

It's a well-worn tactic by the IFA, running to the media to try and inflence players decisions. Gibson's family launched a scathing attack on the IFA in January this year. They questioned the motivation of the IFA in going public with the issue when they had made no contact with him for over 2 years.

His uncle said at the time "Darron has a right to play for Ireland, he is an Irish citizen and has the same rights as everyone else on the island. The IFA cannot dictate to us regarding Darron’s right to play for his country .Darron has no interest in lining out for n.i and has always wanted to play for Ireland”

The issue was adressed and sorted by FIFA in October last year.

"On October 20th 2006, Fifa's Heinz Tannler, Director of Legal Division, and Corina Luck, Head of General Legal, wrote a joint letter to the IFA, which was copied to the FAI, In it, they informed the IFA that 'the existing situation in Northern Ireland allows players to choose whether they wish to represent Northern Ireland or the Republic of Ireland'."

Nigel Worthington said yesterday "He was born in the North so i think its just right he plays for the country he was born in"

Well Nigel, Darron is playing for his country, as are Tony Kane, Michael O'connor, Ruairi Harkin, Marc Wilson etc.. and for many of us football supporters in the North, we are quite content following our country, be it at home games in Dublin or away in Bratislava, Prague or Cardiff.

Get over it.

Quote:

---

Marc Wilson

---

this lad was born in belfast, but with a name like that, what is his background? Don't care either way but it would certainly be a precedent.

Marc's from Aghagallon outside Lurgan in County Armagh. He signed a new two year deal with Portsmouth in June but is believed to be going out on loan to Bournemouth after he gets over a minor groin strain. He spent part of last season on loan with Bournemouth and manager Kevin Bond had tried to sign him permanently, but he was handed the new two deal by Harry Redknapp.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by stiofain

Northern Ireland boss Nigel Worthington is trying to persuade Manchester United prospect Darron Gibson to switch allegiance from the Republic.

The 19-year-old, who was born in Londonderry, is currently at the centre of a dispute between the two countries.

Gibson represented Northern Ireland at Under-16 level but then opted for the Republic as he has an Irish passport.

"I have spoken to him and emphasised how much I want him to be involved with Northern Ireland," said Worthington.

The Northern Ireland manager told the Sunday Life he felt the teenager should play for the country of his birth.

"I want him involved with Northern Ireland and it is a situation which has to be resolved."

Gibson has not played for the Repubilc of Ireland at senior level although he was a non-playnig substitute for a Euro 2008 qualifier against San Marino.
The Irish FA, which governs football in Northrn Ireland, is awaiting a Fifa ruling on Gibson's eligibility.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/foot...ls/6953708.stm

Hands off Nigel!

---

Worthington is being a complete hypocrite. Another quote of his from that article

"He's been born in the North so I think it's only right that the place of birth is the country that you play for."

So I wonder when he will be dropping all the NI players not born in the North? :rolleyes:

"He's been born in the North"
Makes Stan sound almost erudite.

That article is in the Sunday Life

http://www.sundaylife.co.uk/sport/article2876658.ece

Darron Gibson was scheduled to assemble with the Republic of Ireland Under-21 squad on Monday ahead of Tuesday’s friendly game against Germany in Furth. He has, however, now been drafted into the senior panel.

20 quid says he makes an appearance wed night , stan will make sure he is tied into the team.

And hammer another soft nail into the persecuted wee minds.
Talking of which, Ealing's radar on all things "wee" must be out of focus.

Reading the Sunday Life article, they repeat the reason that Darron plays for Ireland "after switching allegiances because of a fall-out with Northern Ireland under-16 coaches"
Might be simpler if the media recognised that young lads want to play for the team of their country as they see it and as is their right.

Quote:

---

Darron Gibson was scheduled to assemble with the Republic of Ireland Under-21 squad on Monday ahead of Tuesday’s friendly game against Germany in Furth. He has, however, now been drafted into the senior panel.

---

savage.

I have to say it was a pretty shameful outburst by Worthington, stirring up controversy for the sake of it. He was never going to change Gibson's mind and all it does is serve to alienate the guy in the North. Maybe he was sending a message to any other young Irish lads up north with eyes on representimg the ROI.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RogerMilla

20 quid says he makes an appearance wed night , stan will make sure he is tied into the team.

---

Wouldn't mind if he did anyway. Have never seen him play but we're short on CM's at the mo and could be well worth having a look at him on Wednesday...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dr. Ogba

Wouldn't mind if he did anyway. Have never seen him play but we're short on CM's at the mo and could be well worth having a look at him on Wednesday...

---

On that note whatever happened to Joey O'Brien? It really isn't looking good for him by the sounds of things. I still haven't even heard of him playing reserve team football yet nevermind making a claim for a starting place in the first team. It's very difficult for a young player to get back from such a long period of injury.

More on bbc: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/foot...ls/6954707.stm

Have a look at this. It's interesting how opinions of his elligibility differ:

http://ourweecountry.ipbhost.com/ind...=15485&st=1155

I was under the assumption if he did play for us against Denmark then he couldn't switch back to NI no matter what's said by EalingGreen on that thread.

I couldn't be ársed reading another "wee" thread.
Once he is capped at senior level in an officially recognised intl. game (from a friendly to a world cup final) he is tied to Ireland. FIFA's rules since 2004.

Would of thought by now it's obvious who he wants to play for and its not NI so hands off worthington - why dont you trawl scotland for players where most of your ancestors come from

Unfortunately I followed the link and will forever regret those lost seconds. The wee people post the most sickening bile. Obviously they are unaware that the right to Irish citizenship to those born in the North is enshrined in the Agreement ratified by the British and Irish governments in 1998.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by youngirish

Have a look at this. It's interesting how opinions of his elligibility differ:

http://ourweecountry.ipbhost.com/ind...=15485&st=1155

I was under the assumption if he did play for us against Denmark then he couldn't switch back to NI no matter what's said by EalingGreen on that thread.

---

I thought the same. Friendly or not.

(I know you're all secretly missing me, so here goes! ;))

As I see it, the question of Gibson's eligibility for the ROI has yet to be resolved. AFAIK, there was some correspondence last year between FIFA and the FAI, which the latter took to mean that Gibson et al were eligible for the ROI.
However, the IFA felt that the letter in question (referred to by Co.Down Green?) was incorrectly applied by FIFA to players in Gibson's position. Therefore, at the beginning of this year(?), they asked FIFA for a definitive determination. So far, at least, that has not been forthcoming. And in the Sunday Life article yesterday (admittedly not the most reliable of sources), it indicated that the latest news is that FIFA have written to the FAI seeking further information, but have yet to receive a reply. (Which, if true, would surprise me after all this time, seeing as it's such an important issue for the FAI)

Further, the SL quoted a rather "bullish" Howard Wells, possibly indicating that he knows something? If so, this might explain the timing of Worthington's latest intervention.

As for Worthington, I think some of the comments here misunderstand his situation. At the very least, it's merely a case of a new manager doing his best to increase the pool of players available to him, since regardless of the ROI's claim, and the player's own allegiances, the one thing we can say with certainty is that Gibson is eligible for NI. As such, Worthington's actions are no different from what any newly appointed manager's - inc. Steve Staunton when he took over.

Moreover, if the IFA is now convinced that Gibson is NOT eligible for the ROI, then all Worthington is actually saying to the player is that whatever went on in the past, neither he (NW) nor the IFA has closed the door on him.

In which case, it could be argued that his case is somewhat analogous to that of a certain Alan Kernaghan, who badly wanted to play for NI, found that the Rules did not allow this, and therefore had to look "elsewhere" for an Association which could accommodate him with international football...

P.S. IIRC, playing in a friendly international, even at senior level, doesn't tie in a player to any one country, though I'd need to check the Rules again. (Doesn't the Joe Lapira thread cover this?)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by eelmonster

Unfortunately I followed the link and will forever regret those lost seconds. The wee people post the most sickening bile. Obviously they are unaware that the right to Irish citizenship to those born in the North is enshrined in the Agreement ratified by the British and Irish governments in 1998.

---

Citizenship is a political question and eligibility to represent a particular football association is a footballing question.

Governments deal with the former and FIFA with the latter. Therefore, they are not necessarily the same.

Quote:

---

Governments deal with the former and FIFA with the latter. Therefore, they are not necessarily the same.

---

hmmm, i remember a particular foreign minister lobby fifa and it directlyaffected the outcome, so dont be so blind to that. everyone knows ( unfortunately perhaps ) that football and politics do criss-cross.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by greendeiseboy

Would of thought by now it's obvious who he wants to play for and its not NI so hands off worthington - why dont you trawl scotland for players where most of your ancestors come from

---

I hardly think it appropriate for a supporter of the FAI team to cast aspersions on another Association's non-territorial recruitment policy - especially when it comes to eligbility via ancestry!

As for the NI team which will represent us on Wednesday, I'd be prepared to bet it will have more Irish born and bred players representing it than the ROI equivalent in Denmark...

P.S. As I said earlier, the one thing we can say with certainty in this whole affair is that Gibson is (and always has been) eligible to represent NI. ;)

Quote:

---

is that Gibson is (and always has been) eligible to represent NI.

---

and Ireland. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by paul_oshea

hmmm, i remember a particular foreign minister lobby fifa and it directlyaffected the outcome, so dont be so blind to that. everyone knows ( unfortunately perhaps ) that football and politics do criss-cross.

---

No, you remember a particular foreign minister* seek to claim the credit for a particular directive from FIFA. Anyone can write a letter to FIFA (or issue a Press Release) on such matters.

However, FIFA deal with all such issues strictly according to their own long-established procedures. In this case, it is crystal clear that they responded to the IFA, which acted through the usual channels.



* - Unless you find it hard to believe that a politician like Aherne would be so venial as to exploit the efforts of others for his own political gain...:eek:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by paul_oshea

and Ireland. ;)

---

Does he play Rugby? Or maybe you mean Cricket...;)

Quote:

---

Unless you find it hard to believe that a politician like Aherne would be so venial as to exploit the efforts of others for his own political gain...

---

No for the gain of his constituents and his fellow countrymen and women ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EalingGreen

P.S. IIRC, playing in a friendly international, even at senior level, doesn't tie in a player to any one country, though I'd need to check the Rules again. (Doesn't the Joe Lapira thread cover this?)

---

You are having another one of your Dougal moments.

Because in the Lapira thread you admitted that you had a misconception of the FIFA rules
and wrote

Quote:

---

In which case, if Lapira retains hope of representing the USA, he's in for a disappointment...

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by geysir

You are having another one of your Dougal moments.

---

In fairness these are often very selective Dougal moments

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EalingGreen

Citizenship is a political question and eligibility to represent a particular football association is a footballing question.

---

On the contrary, citizenship is precisely the means by which FIFA test a player's eligibility to play for a national team.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EalingGreen

As I see it, the question of Gibson's eligibility for the ROI has yet to be resolved. AFAIK, there was some correspondence last year between FIFA and the FAI, which the latter took to mean that Gibson et al were eligible for the ROI.

---

Darron is eligible now to play for Ireland. FIFA say so. He is registered as an Irish international.
If Darron plays on wed. he is tied forever.
Even if FIFA changed their minds on this issue after Darron has a senior cap the ruling would not apply to Darron.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by geysir

You are having another one of your Dougal moments.

Because in the Lapira thread you admitted that you had a misconception of the FIFA rules
and wrote

---

Having just re-read the Lapira thread, the sequence was this. Without my actually checking, I initially stated my belief that a friendly international does not tie a player in.

You then challenged this assertion, with a quotation from FIFA's regulations, which I accepted.

However, Metrostars then contradicted your stance, successfully I thought, by quoting the following from FIFA Regulations:
http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/affe...5fpdf%5f52.pdf
"2. With the exception of the conditions specified in par. 3 and 4 below, any Player who has already represented one Association in a match (either in full or in part) in an official competition of any category or any type of football may not play an international match for a representative team of another Association."

You didn't accept his interpretation, but he "trumped your ace" by quoting the following Letter from the FAI:

"Hi Ciaran

Thank you for your query. According to FIFA regulations a player who has
already represented one Association in a match (either in full or part) in an
official competition or any category may not play an international match for a
representative team of another Association. However a player may request a
change of Association from FIFA up to his 21st birthday.

As Joe Lapira has only represented the Republic of Ireland in a friendly match,
he would not be tied to this Association.

I hope this information is of assistance to you. For further information you
can find the FIFA regulations on the FIFA website - www.fifa.com.

Kind regards

Mr. Chris Ryan
International Department Manager
Football Association of Ireland"

Consequently, without re-reading all the Regulations for myself, my original opinion is reinforced by Metrostars: i.e. that a friendly full international does not tie in a player.

However, I don't intend to take the trouble to check, since it is not relevant to Gibson's case. That is because he is either eligible for the ROI or he's not. If he is, then he's never going to play for NI, so that's an end to it.

If, however, he is not eligible to play for the ROI, then it is the FAI who will be punished should they select him. If it is merely a friendly, frankly there's not a lot FIFA can do in practical terms. However, should the FAI select an ineligible player for a competitive match, then they risk being docked points etc.
(Btw, it is this lack of an effective sanction for friendlies which I think explains why FIFA make a distinction between friendlies and competitive matches)

As for the player himself, I don't actually know whether they would also punish him. My suspicion (no more than that) is that if a player knows or should know that he is ineligible (e.g. by making a false declaration or profferring false documents etc), then he will also be punished. However, if a player makes an honest mistake*, especially following incorrect information from the Association selecting him, I doubt if FIFA would impose anything more than a nominal penalty (if that).


* - In this case, I have no doubt that Gibson is sincere.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EalingGreen

You didn't accept his interpretation, but he "trumped your ace" by quoting the following Letter from the FAI:

"Hi Ciaran

Thank you for your query. According to FIFA regulations a player who has
already represented one Association in a match (either in full or part) in an
official competition or any category may not play an international match for a
representative team of another Association. However a player may request a
change of Association from FIFA up to his 21st birthday.

As Joe Lapira has only represented the Republic of Ireland in a friendly match,
he would not be tied to this Association.

I hope this information is of assistance to you. For further information you
can find the FIFA regulations on the FIFA website - www.fifa.com.

Kind regards

Mr. Chris Ryan*
International Department Manager
Football Association of Ireland"

---

..but Chris Ryan is female and not a mister:D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EalingGreen

You didn't accept his interpretation, but he "trumped your ace" by quoting the following Letter from the FAI:

---

You don't call a supposed letter from the FAI as an ace.
Read my next reply where his arguement was effectivly answered and he had no reply.
Metrostars was referring to a situation that had existed before 2004.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by geysir

You don't call a supposed letter from the FAI as an ace.
Read my next reply where his arguement was effectivly answered and he had no reply.
Metrostars was referring to a situation that had existed before 2004.

---

Leaving aside the implication that Metrostars fabricated the ("supposed") letter, perhaps you are correct - frankly, I couldn't be arsed to follow it up further for myself.

However, the question of whether or not a friendly ties a player down to one Association for which he is eligible to the exclusion of another, is not relevant to the case of Darron Gibson.

We know he is eligible to represent the IFA through birthplace, parents, residence etc. We do not know whether he is also eligible to represent the FAI. That is something only FIFA can determine and until they do, no-one outside that organisation is in a position to pontificate.

Until now, I have been genuinely unsure as to which way FIFA will go - I'd have called it 50-50. However, Wells's comments in the SL Article are causing me to edge cautiously towards believing that FIFA may rule against the FAI.

Anyhow, we know that Worthington is keen to resolve this quickly if he is to have any chance, however slim, of having Gibson available for selection before the Euro Qualifiers are over.

I wonder is Stan equally as keen to know? As I said elsewhere, one way of expediting this would be if Stan picked DG for a full competitive match. Not even FIFA could could continue to sit on the fence in the face of a challenge by the ROI's opponents!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EalingGreen

Leaving aside the implication that Metrostars fabricated the ("supposed") letter, perhaps you are correct

---

There is absolutly no hint of an implication that Metrostars fabricated the letter. He merely reposted the letter that was posted in another forum.
He stated that quite clearly and what forum the letter was posted.

Even if the letter did come from the FAI, it is tripe.