if ever there was an example of how to manage money and build up a club here it is
Printable View
if ever there was an example of how to manage money and build up a club here it is
What is your point though?
They NEVER EVER spent outside their means,
and now they have grown from a Dr.Martens League team with a rickety old stadium, to a club who have reached the promised land (3rd round). They have a brand new stadium and are talkin about building a hotel. also are now in contention for promotion to league 2..
I've been saying it for years - eL sides spend too much on wages, until this close season not been foreign clubs queuing up for them.
No chance of promotion - Oxford and Dagenham will go up this season - even if one of those don't then York would be the third.
And Burton were absolutely played off the park by Worcester in the FA Trophy a couple of weeks ago - one of the worst teams I've seen this season down at St George's Lane - and I include Hemel Hempsted, Basingstoke and Lancaster City in that
Yes, but it is hard for other clubs to match UCD's other 'incentives' to players. What other club could attract players by offering scholarships to third level? Wages is just part of it - having UCD's funding for sports clubs - through scholarships particularly is a great leverage for the club.:ball:
Cork IT is it? That's my point, most clubs have the option of doing something similar to UCD.
Even if they did go up by some fluke - they wouldn't be able to sustain Full-Time Football on Football League budgets and costings - Tamworth tried it to some extent in the Conference - now in major trouble, Telford tried it to get themselves up to standard to push for promotion to the Football League - they went bust and had to reform as a new club in the Unibond.
Scarborough are another team that have problems thanks to the cost of trying to sustain League Football a few years back...
Even Hereford have stuggled a bit this season with the progression to League 2...
Ourselves and UCD are two prime examples of clubs living within their means and making a right go of it.
A salary cap should be introduced like they have in American sports. Each club would only be allowed to spend so much on wages per year and if they brerak it they get fined.
How can you assert that Bray live within their means if you haven't seen their accounts?
As are everyone in the league. So why single out UCD and Bray?
three students on this page I thought you told your parents that you needed them laptops for study.
You don't need to be a rocket scientist to see that Bray and UCD get far fewer people at their matches then the likes of Shels, Bohs, Derry, Cork, etc. My point is it must therefore be harder to achieve success with limited finances available, that's why the teams with smaller attendances (therefore smaller income) should be credited for doing well.
Yeah but those clubs that do spend more , are more successful than either Bray or UCD.
Don't think Bray have been achieving success of late!
Bray's retained losses are approaching the million mark at this stage. If we define "living within your means" as break even and not living off share capital from directors, then Bray aren't living within their means.
Nothing against Bray, but just wanted to set the record straight.