Def Leppard on VH1 ...um.. Classic Albums? Surely there's been a mistake.

Okay ...I have little enough time for VH1 anyway as they have a tendency to pass off glorified adverts and fawning anal lolling commentary as historically accurate documentary.

Mercifully I was about to switch off the box and head for the leaba anyway at midnight last night when their Classic Album programme came on and tempted that part of the psyche that rubber-necks at car crashes with the promise of Def Leppards 1987 multi-million selling turd of a yoke 'Hysteria'.

I only watched 2-3 minutes of it -by which time one of them (baldier guitarist) had already uttered that magical line "NO-body else was doing what we were doing at that time...". (well nobody bar Europe, Poison, Faster f**kin pussycat, quiet riot, Bon b@stard Jovi, Motley Crud and a whole legion of other poodle permed muppets)

They also seemed to think that Hysteria made them "the biggest band in the world" even if they had the cop on to qualify such a ludicrous assertion with "...for a little while". (worth bearing in mind this manky record came out within weeks of U2s Joshua Tree and Jackos 'Bad'.)

Actually that reminds me -at least Jacko, for his many faults, seemed a little embarrassed by so many singles being lifted from Bad -these pillocks are downright proud of it -seven singles in all -each one worse than the last.

I'll tell you it's a good thing I'd only had two bottles of Newcastle -any more and I'd be shopping for a new TV today.

Ya found it a bit hilarious myself alright, no surprises for vh1 though (Robbies Williams best male of all time anyone) :eek:

Another memorable quote: "I mean there was so many rock bands at the time who weren't about the music, we changed all that" :eek:

Upon which I smiled ruefully and turned on Black Books

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lim till i die

Ya found it a bit hilarious myself alright, no surprises for vh1 though (Robbies Williams best male of all time anyone) :eek:

Another memorable quote: "I mean there was so many rock bands at the time who weren't about the music, we changed all that" :eek:

Upon which I smiled ruefully and turned on Black Books

---

Was that from last night?:D aw man stop.

Savage beating for Mr. Elliot ...

I somehow, inexplicably ended up on Europes site a while back and they were rationalising their own ****eness and general downfall and namechecked some of their contemporaries like Leppard who suffered similarily from "the rise of grunge in the late 80's and into the 90's". The opined that their "life affirming music" became unfashionable for a time.

Someone please tell them grunge had nothing to do with it ...the fact is their skanger audience switched en masse to what some of them to this day call 'rave'.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lionel Ritchie

Was that from last night?:D aw man stop.

Savage beating for Mr. Elliot ...

---

Indeed it was

The sincerity in his eyes as he said was breathtaking :eek:

You know they've done more county fairs than the Beatles :p

i like def leppard :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by paul_oshea

i like def leppard :(

---

Ah c'mon Paul where's yer Moxy? I thought you'd mount a more spirited counter than that now. (metaphorically chucks Paul a scabbard) At you -Sir!:D :p

Quote:

---

Ah c'mon Paul where's yer Moxy? I thought you'd mount a more spirited counter than that now. (metaphorically chucks Paul a scabbard) At you -Sir

---

no i can only fight the fight on so many threads....

...and besides, you are around a lot longer than I, and therefore know a lot more about GOOD music than I :D

*Please note the use of the words ( together ) good music. none of that nicole ritchie or any of that crap constitutes the word GOOD. ;)

I personally thought Pyromania and Hysteria were/are great albums. Millions of others thought the same.

they did what few did in their time, and that was to break america!!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by drinkfeckarse

I personally thought Pyromania and Hysteria were/are great albums. Millions of others thought the same.

---

Isn't there a mathematical formula out there that deals with the probability of someone debating on an internet forum bringing up comparisons with Hitler, the nazis, the rise of nazism etc... that says it's most likely to happen within the first 15 posts? I think I've got it inside ten.

Or if I may paraphrase my dear mum ..." If millions jumped in the Shannon..."

Hysteeeeeeeer -ee -uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh!!! :p

Quote:

---

they did what few did in their time, and that was to break america!!!!

---

So did the prohibitionists -but what the hell does that mean? Few from anywhere "break america" as america isn't really a single unified market -probably even less so than Europe -which is odd considering they all speak the same language allegedly.

With rare exception the two unifying factors in acts that do shift mega units in the states are that they play lowest common denominator muck and that they've a massive, massive money machine behind them them that simply will not let the record fail.

They said as much last night in the two minutes I watched. They totally embraced making a sickeningly commercial record because the massive machine behind them was going to require feeding. They had to sell 5 million to break even.

Christ they didn't even try to play the "musically we'd nowhere else to go coz we'd exausted the genre" card Metallica would play a few years later or the "the next record's just the next record" tripe that REM and U2 come out with.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by paul_oshea

they did what few did in their time, and that was to break america!!!!

---

Big deal, so did Nickelback

nickleback had the advantage of being from north america, joe it is a big deal breaking america.

its a very diverse culture, having said that there taste in music is way better and above those from this side of the pond who go for anything with a base beat and drum


come on fire me up......quality. just listening to it now. do you disapprove Lionel?

BTw, the americans are not just driven by lowest common denomiator - whatever that may be, im not quite sure what you mean - their eclectic listening taste goes a lot further than the above mentioned.....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lionel Ritchie

Isn't there a mathematical formula out there that deals with the probability of someone debating on an internet forum bringing up comparisons with Hitler, the nazis, the rise of nazism etc... that says it's most likely to happen within the first 15 posts? I think I've got it inside ten.

---

Just pointing out a simple fact. They sold millions of records. You don't like them? Grand so, just spare us the big rant. It's hardly worth it.

taste in music is way better and above those from this side of the pond who go for anything with a base beat and drum

That's a laughable statement, on so many levels.

As regards DL, I have no interest in them or their genre, but that's no reason to say this album isn't a classic.

noby, that was the point of the statement ;)

Always liked Def Leppard. Sound lads one and all too. The only band from outside the US to ever have two consecutive albums sell over 10 million (or was it 15?) in the US. A lot of highly-rated (read over-rated) British acts like the the Beatles and The Stones and The Smiths have never managed it. Ditto for the likes of The Smiths, The Stone Roses and Oasis.

'Hysteria' is a classic. Dated for sure but a great album.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by drinkfeckarse

Just pointing out a simple fact. They sold millions of records. You don't like them? Grand so, just spare us the big rant. It's hardly worth it.

---

I'll spare you nothing. It's my thread ...if you don't like it's content spare yourself getting offended and uppity, add me to your ignore list and move on to something else -or start up a "Hysteria IS a classic album" thread. I'll be happy to debate it's merits with you.

Quote:

---

its a very diverse culture, having said that there taste in music is way better and above those from this side of the pond who go for anything with a base beat and drum

---

Laughable nonsense aside -It's interesting, Paul, that you issue what I'm guessing is a sly dig at dance music. The last UK acts, that come to my mind, that did serious coast to coast business in the United States are The Prodigy, The Chemical Brothers and especially Fatboy Slim. All had multi million sellers in the US on as close to their own terms as it gets.

'da leps' sold the pass on doing anything on their own terms at the pre-production meeting before they even sat down to "write" the garbage that comprised their supposedly iconic masterpiece.

Quote:

---

'Hysteria' is a classic. Dated for sure but a great album.

---

It was dated the day they released it SLK. Manky pub rock dressed up spandex and poodle perms. You could likely interchange any song on it with anything Heart had out on their yoke and not notice. Christ you could interchange it with anything Bonnie Tyler was singing in a german beer garden at the time.

good man sadloserkid i like facts to back my points......stone roses are sh1te, oasis are really sh1te for simple minded people with simple tastes, rolling stones are the most over-rated band ever along with the beatles.

Quote:

---

The Prodigy, The Chemical Brothers and especially Fatboy Slim. All had multi million sellers in the US on as close to their own terms as it gets.

---

hmmmmmm can you link me to this about the prodigy? Dance music has a big "underground" following in the states, and most of it is fed through continental europe and mainly the UK ( the 3 bands you listed are all english bands, that are the leaders in their style of music ), so i wouldn't really hold much to this arguement as in this "genre" of "MUSIC" america doesnt set the tone for the rest of the world unlike others mainly rock, hip-hop and pop.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lionel Ritchie

It's my thread ....

---

:D :D :o

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by paul_oshea

good man sadloserkid i like facts to back my points......stone roses are sh1te, oasis are really sh1te for simple minded people with simple tastes, rolling stones are the most over-rated band ever along with the beatles.

---

Paul I'm not a huge fan of any of the acts you mention there -in fact I fairly despise Oasis -who incidently are no more nor less inclined toward pub-rock than Def Lep.
In that regard -if you're going to call people simple minded for indulging them ...then all I'll say is people who live in glass houses should do their w@nking in the basement.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by paul_oshea

hmmmmmm can you link me to this about the prodigy? .

---

Here's the very first link I found as I haven't all afternoon. http://www.sfstation.com/the-prodigy-e26420

"1997's incredibly successful Fat of the Land was the first major electronic music album to crack the US sales charts. Whereas the much-hyped "electronica" revolution was mostly a dud, the Prodigy were an unqualified hit, and helped pave the way for those few electronic acts who achieved serious success in the states. Although electronic music remains to this day something of a novelty on American radio, what little presence it has owes a great deal to the Prodigy's initial success. The strength of propulsive, rock-infused dance singles such as "Firestarter" and "Breathe" insured the group a presence on domestic rock radio for many years to come."
- from popmatters.com

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by paul_oshea

( the 3 bands you listed are all english bands, that are the leaders in their style of music ), so i wouldn't really hold much to this arguement as in this "genre" of "MUSIC" america doesnt set the tone for the rest of the world unlike others mainly rock, hip-hop and pop.

---

I deliberately listed UK acts as you seemed to imply DefLep deserved a medal for "breaking america". I think you're saying that this is because the americans feel they "own the genre" -if so they're welcome to it. Though I would just say it's a long way back to 1956 (even from a 1987 perspective) when rock'n'roll was seen as an american franchise.

In a sense if I follow the logic of your argument then it makes Fatboy Slims success all the more remarkable as it was widely believed in the US that FBS was a multi-personnel techno rock band in the NIN mould. A myth that Norman Cook was happy enough to play up. Even makes fun of it on the intro to Rockefeller Skank.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lionel Ritchie

It was dated the day they released it SLK. Manky pub rock dressed up spandex and poodle perms. You could likely interchange any song on it with anything Heart had out on their yoke and not notice. Christ you could interchange it with anything Bonnie Tyler was singing in a german beer garden at the time.

---

We don't like Bonnie Tyler now? Not even 'Total Eclipse...'? :p

Def Leppard were cheesy as hell for sure but whatever man, I wouldn't hold that against them. They were no less 'real' or 'credible' than say Nirvana ten years later.

And just to clarify, slk rates both The Stone Roses and Oasis to varying degrees and The Beatles and The Stones not at all.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sadloserkid

Def Leppard were cheesy as hell for sure but whatever man, I wouldn't hold that against them. They were no less 'real' or 'credible' than say Nirvana ten years later.

---

Let 'em be cheesy as Gouda ...but the apostacy that Hysteria is a "classic album" in any sense beyond being a unit shifter shouldn't be allowed go unchallenged.
Interesting you mention Nirvana who actually released 'Nevermind' a mere four years after DL released Hysteria. (by which time Elliot and co. were asking an increasingly disinterested market if "a Rocks out of the question") :rolleyes:

First off, I wouldn't qualify as a Nirvana "fan". Liked a few songs and thought they'd a good energy -but I dislike junkie glorification and I genuinely reckon if KC hadn't died then today we'd celebrate Nirvanas canon of work to not much greater extent than, say, Soundgarden.

BUT what separates Hysteria from Nevermind is that in fifty or a hundred years time the latter will still be considered a footnote and a marking post in the history of late 20th Century music culture and the former will only pop up in VH1s classic albums and occasionly in 100 worst haircuts of the (19)80's.

I remember hitching to Cork in early 1992 and sitting in a doorway on college road waiting for my girlfriend to came home and let me in. I read an interview in HP with Joe Elliot where he actually spoke about Nirvana and how the two bands compared. The fact that he went on the defensive and stated "I don't think they make us sound the way we made Rainbow sound" made me issue a hearty guffaw they'd have heard up in UCC as I suspect he feared that was exactly the case.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lionel Ritchie

First off, I wouldn't qualify as a Nirvana "fan". Liked a few songs and thought they'd a good energy -but I dislike junkie glorification and I genuinely reckon if KC hadn't died then today we'd celebrate Nirvanas canon of work to not much greater extent than, say, Soundgarden.

BUT what separates Hysteria from Nevermind is that in fifty or a hundred years time the latter will still be considered a footnote and a marking post in the history of late 20th Century music culture and the former will only pop up in VH1s classic albums and occasionly in 100 worst haircuts of the (19)80's.

---

I would contend that we'd be celebrating Nirvana's 'legacy' far less than that of the other three grunge heavyweights Alice In Chains, Pearl Jam and the afroementioned Soundgarden.

I disagree with your second point to be honest. I believe that 'Hysteria' will be remembered almost as significantly as 'Nevermind'. The 80s were an embarrassment in many respects for sure but aside from 'Appetite for Destruction' there's not many albums that encapsulated the era as well. It was a pretty horrible scene and if any single album by Motley Crue or Warrant or Ratt was given the position that 'Hysteria' enjoys critically today I'd be on your side of the argument right now. 'Hysteria' is a good record though when taken in context of the time time and place that it came from. It's not particularly groundbreaking or unforgetable but it's definitely a classic 1980's record. In fact give it 10 years and I would imagine that much of the disdain currently shown towards 80s pop culture will have diluted. Def Leppard will become Abba and Nirvana will occupy a position in the minds of the next generation of Lionel Ritchies as Def Leppard do in your own today.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sadloserkid

I would contend that we'd be celebrating Nirvana's 'legacy' far less than that of the other three grunge heavyweights Alice In Chains, Pearl Jam and the afroementioned Soundgarden.

---

That'll require a thread split. I'm not debating it on a thread dedicated to giving Def Leppard a badly needed kicking.:cool:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sadloserkid

I disagree with your second point to be honest. I believe that 'Hysteria' will be remembered almost as significantly as 'Nevermind'.

---

SOLVENT ABUSE KILLS!

By no means do I contend that Nirvana sat down and said "Lets' make a record that'll shift the polar axis of guitar based rock'n'roll, burns off the dead wood (like DL) and make the term 'heavy metal' redundant" ...but that's what happened -regardless of how much design or control Nirvana had over it.

Indie-kids listening to metal, metal kids listening to indie, genres forming, collapsing, merging... entire rosters of talentless poodle perms dropped and replaced with talentless lumberjack shirt wearers, Matt Dillon and Winona Ryder getting a gig in a dire romcom. None of those things happened in the wake of Hysteria.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sadloserkid

The 80s were an embarrassment in many respects for sure but aside from 'Appetite for Destruction' there's not many albums that encapsulated the era as well.

---

Despite not being a fan of GNR -I find the guilt by assocciation with DL offensive on their behalf.

The two were on different planets in terms of perspective and herein lies the crux of my complaint about DL. Namely -all achievement should be measured against the background context in which such achievement is realised and the resources available to bring the achievement about. Appetite For Destruction was GNRs breakthrough record, Nevermind was Nirvanas breakthrough record, Hysteria was NOT DLs breakthrough record. It was a cynical commercial stab -every bit as much so as any Stock, Aitken and Waterman record out at the same time. Pyromania had been a huge hit for DL back in 83 ...other bands might've used the bargaining chips this would've earned them to push the envelope a bit. DL on the other hand chose to push Hysteria as far infield as possible. They weren't alone in doing so by any means ...far more talented people than them -Alice Cooper and Whitesnake come to mind -made equally vile but commercially huge records at the same time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sadloserkid

In fact give it 10 years and I would imagine that much of the disdain currently shown towards 80s pop culture will have diluted.

---

What disdain would that be? noughties Pop culture is obsessed with the '80's. From Sugababes to Franz Ferdinand, Marilyn Manson to Girls Aloud, The Killers to every second RNB (sic) record based on a Kool and The Gang sample.

That only failed boyband Zoo have chosen to revisit the work we're currently discussing is telling in terms of it's staying power ...do keep the candle burnin' mind ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sadloserkid

Def Leppard will become Abba and Nirvana will occupy a position in the minds of the next generation of Lionel Ritchies as Def Leppard do in your own today.

---

While I acknowledge your logic -I don't concur with it. :D

Quote:

---

The 80s were an embarrassment in many respects for sure but aside from 'Appetite for Destruction' there's not many albums that encapsulated the era as well.

---

As a stand-alone statement, I couldn't disagree more, but I presume you're talking within the context of whatever genre D.L. fall in to.

"Pyromania" is a far superior record to "Hysteria" even in the Def Leppard ouevre. My favourite song by the band would be " Foolin' " closely followed by " When Love and Hate Collide" , which are songs which have more than one dimension to them musically and show the potential versatility of the band. Met Joe Elliott on the ferry to Holyhead once, he was a gent, and more into talking about Sheffield United than music.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sadloserkid

Always liked Def Leppard. Sound lads one and all too. The only band from outside the US to ever have two consecutive albums sell over 10 million (or was it 15?) in the US. A lot of highly-rated (read over-rated) British acts like the the Beatles and The Stones and The Smiths have never managed it. Ditto for the likes of The Smiths, The Stone Roses and Oasis.

'Hysteria' is a classic. Dated for sure but a great album.

---

Oh, well if it sold over 10 Million it MUST be a great album, no more argument needed there surely :eek: (PS Beatles and Smiths over rated - my god, Children these days - cloth ears I tell ya)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CollegeTillIDie

Met Joe Elliott on the ferry to Holyhead once, he was a gent, and more into talking about Sheffield United than music.

---

Doesn't surprise me in the least. Some would opine he has no interest in music whatsoever :p

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TonyD

(PS Beatles and Smiths over rated - my god, Children these days - cloth ears I tell ya)

---

The Smiths are a decent band... the cult of the Beatles on the other hand... the most inexplicable aspect of mankind's existence is that a group that are so bland and utterly meaningless can be hailed for being a second rate Kinks. :confused:

Quote:

---

The Smiths are a decent band...

---

Jesus that's high praise. sure you don't want to qualify that on the basis they didn't sell much in amerikay?

Quote:

---

the cult of the Beatles on the other hand... the most inexplicable aspect of mankind's existence is that a group that are so bland and utterly meaningless can be hailed for being a second rate Kinks

---

Not a huge Beatles fan myself (my one and a half year old loves them mind) but 'bland and meaningless'? Four seperate personalities all of whom could've done well had the beatles never happened? C'mon.

Steering this thing back OT...

The only thing I'll ever give Def Lep credit for is that they let Lefty McSouthpaw keep his job after he lost the arm. It betrays an underlying decency and genuine good naturedness not immediatley evident from the muck they ply. ...and it's not a charity job either -he can do the gig.

I do believe if it had been, say, a "proper" metal band like Metallica -a band I like btw, they'd have scratched their arses about it for a couple of weeks and then rationalised fcuking him out somehow being for his own good. Just a hunch.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lionel Ritchie

Jesus that's high praise. sure you don't want to qualify that on the basis they didn't sell much in amerikay?

No need really. What I will say is that if they were American they would have disappeared with nary a ripple on this side of the Atlantic as the British media loves nothing more than overhyping their own bands at the expense of all others and for some bizarre reason people in this country are happy to follow that trend. The current slew of crap British rock acts doing the rounds are testement to this.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lionel Ritchie

Not a huge Beatles fan myself (my one and a half year old loves them mind) but 'bland and meaningless'? Four seperate personalities all of whom could've done well had the beatles never happened? C'mon.

---

I think they're pretty anonymous as a band. Four personalities I'll give you for sure but people would make the same argument for the likes of Robbie Williams and Pete Doherty and while I have more respect for The Beatles than that I still don't see much about them to get excited about. Maybe 'Yesterday'. :)

Steering this thing back OT...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lionel Ritchie

The only thing I'll ever give Def Lep credit for is that they let Lefty McSouthpaw keep his job after he lost the arm. It betrays an underlying decency and genuine good naturedness not immediatley evident from the muck they ply. ...and it's not a charity job either -he can do the gig.

I do believe if it had been, say, a "proper" metal band like Metallica -a band I like btw, they'd have scratched their arses about it for a couple of weeks and then rationalised fcuking him out somehow being for his own good. Just a hunch.

---

Drummers union speaking there perhaps? :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sadloserkid

I think they're pretty anonymous as a band. Four personalities I'll give you for sure but people would make the same argument for the likes of Robbie Williams and Pete Doherty ....

---

Sorry I should've been a bit more specific in what I meant by 'personality' ...It's not that common to find a band where it's reasonable to assume all the members would've been succesful in other bands in any event (Led Zep style supergroups aside -as they were formed with guys already 'famous' to varying degrees.)

I think it's quite likely that Lennon and McCartney would've written hit records even if they'd never met. McCartney, while being considered the light weight of the two had a great 'pop sensibility'.

Harrison was a fine guitarist ...if he's not ranked up there with Beck, Clapton, Hendrix, Gilmour, Townshend -then it's down to the fact he had to effectively retire from playing live at the time those reputations were being made.

Ringo Starr was the drummers drummer. All his contemporaries, the drummers that are now considered the 'greats' -looked up to him ...Moon, Bonham, Mitchell, Paice, Mason ...even Watts and Baker who were older than him.

ringo is sh1te, nothing difficult about any of the drumming he had to do.

btw lionel, my point about fatboy slim, was not what you were getting at, it was simply dance music that makes it big in britain is the only real influence big in america in the underground dance scene, therefore making it big in britain also ( generally ) means making it big in the states - dance music scene that is.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by paul_oshea

ringo is sh1te, nothing difficult about any of the drumming he had to do.

---

Which is possibly why all those drummers I mentioned in the above post thought he had it down. I'll always have Moon, Mitchell and the rest ahead of him -but I'll take their word as law that he's who they aspired to be like.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by paul_oshea

btw lionel, my point about fatboy slim, was not what you were getting at, it was simply dance music that makes it big in britain is the only real influence big in america in the underground dance scene, therefore making it big in britain also ( generally ) means making it big in the states - dance music scene that is.

---

Tell that to the scissors sisters. I don't see what point of mine you're countering by the way.

America didn't have the same perspective of FBS that we had at all. He had no 'Norman Cook multi persona' in the US that he had in this neck of the woods. The Housemartins (another great band who not only didn't "crack" america but never released a record nor toured there), Beats International, Pizzaman and the rest had no profile whatsoever in the states. They thought he was a band. A rock'n'roll band at that.

Just to get back on topic ....

What's got 10 legs, 9 arms, no brain and sounds like sh1t? :D

thats quite a good joke.....

...though I probably should've finished it with a snare roll and cymbal

rat-tat-tat-tat-tat-tat-tat-tat -crash!!!

or as yer man would put it...

rat- -tat- -tat- -tat- -crash!!! :eek:

:D