Originally Posted by TheJamaicanP.M.
Will disagree with you on this one $Leon$. There are a number of reasons why Hill 16 should be given to the away fans. Firstly, it is more segregated from the rest of the ground. Because the Hogan, Canal and Cusack stands are continuous, it means that anyone can walk around the ground. It would be difficult to secure away fans in the Canal End and would probably mean empty seats between them and the home support. On the other hand, Hill 16 is not connected to the main stands, which makes is better for security reasons. Secondly, although the roof doesn't cover much seating in Croker, at least it encloses the pitch somewhat. That means that the atmosphere created by the home support will be more likely to stay within the ground, as opposed to Hill 16 where it will drift off into the night skies.
As for the suggestion that away support could be put in the upper deck of the Canal End, this will never happen. As far as I can recall, the last time away support was put in the upper deck was in the West Stand at Lansdowne when we played England in 1995. If trouble breaks out on the upper deck of a stand, it is much more dangerous.
As for the composition of Hill 16, all material was removed a couple of years ago so it is no longer composed of rubble from the Rising.:)