look like the cover is beginning
the EL has requested that the webmasters over on corkcityfc.ie delete threads containing fintan cassidys observors report
ollie has done it again
Printable View
look like the cover is beginning
the EL has requested that the webmasters over on corkcityfc.ie delete threads containing fintan cassidys observors report
ollie has done it again
any chance it can be put here?Quote:
Originally Posted by thecorner
its on shels MB
I thought it was on here ... cant remember which thread though ??Quote:
Originally Posted by Roverstillidie
If it s guy observation, that he actually witnessed ... how can anything be wrong with that ??
This it? :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by A face
The CCFC official forum doesn't censor anything usually so this eircom league request/threat must have been very senior!
IMO the league needs to deal with the Tolka incidents immeadiately. Having an investigation that takes weeks is not sufficient & will onky mean there ongoing chatter amoung eL fans!
No ... that not it .... it was the original one ... about 200-300 words ..... made for good reading !!
Sheeze ... the league removing thread ..... tis like feicing Big Brother aint it !! :eek:
Why cant they be seen to be as active for other issue that arise ..... can we get an answer to that one ??? :(
Exactly ..... if they resolve this one ... we might have a bit of faith !!Quote:
Originally Posted by pete
no matter how many posts go missing ..... we'll all still await the resolution ..... and just and fair resolution should be paramount at this stage ..... they do realise this right ???!?! :eek:
http://shelbournefcchat.100megs35.co...pic.php?t=3832
You can see it here. Silly that it is in the public domain like this really.
any other boards asked to take it down
Shels is official as well isn't it? Wonder why they're allowed have it...
Me too to be honest, and not only that but posted by a moderator.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dodge
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOwl
Could it be something to do with the two set of rules ..... our rules ... and the other ones ..... y'know .... Ollies ones !!
To be honest, if that is the case, then it reflects a lot more badly on the league, than it does on Ollie.Quote:
Originally Posted by A face
In attendance was Joe Corcoran
Well if you ever want something swept under the rug Joes your man
He has the worst wig ive ever seen!
btw, does anybody know why the middle part of the second page is blanked out? something that people didn't want to be seen?
:D :D I knowQuote:
Originally Posted by hoops1
will now actually stick up for shels here - it must have been received by the league first - if you look at the top it appears to have come from a fax from the eircom league and the fax number is also there. perhaps its normal procedure to fax clubs a copy of the incident report once it has arrived :confused:
SO WHY ARE THE EL GOING AROUND BULLYING CLUBS INTO DELETING THE REPORTQuote:
Originally Posted by ColinR
maybe becuase the assessor completly fudged the report?Quote:
Originally Posted by thecorner
The report shouldn't be in the public domain in the 1st place! If it turns out the whole thing is sub judice having a potential key piece of evidence in circulation could be viewed as being prejudicial.
I would have thought a former public representative well used to the rule of law would have realised this?
Muppet.
Sorry. I'm lost (happens a lot, I know). Who are you referring to?Quote:
Originally Posted by OneRedArmy
Fintan Cassidy used to be a councillor. I assume that's what he's talking about.Quote:
Originally Posted by BohDiddley
I thinks hes talking about Fintan Cassidy - the bloke who posted the report.
He was elected to Dublin City Council a few years ago, as an independent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BohDiddley
I was thinking exactly the same thing - isn't that report a Confidential Document?
Something that should NOT be given to all and sundry?
You never see any Premiership Assessor reports being posted on the Arsenal, Chelsea or Manchester United forums?
Seems to me that Shelbourne are acting in an unprofessional manner here - maybe an attempt at getting said report ruled null and void (as highlighted above in the prejudicial posting) if it ever went any further...