To be honest I think our team looks like a Keegan team, plenty of attacking players, yet we could end up with an Allardyce or a Sanchez....
I just wonder sometimes about how quick we are to write off certain candidates.
Printable View
You're probably right there. We need a manager who is a good motivator and is not overly worried about tactics. Tactics is short hand for "worrying about the opposition" and messing around with formations and lineups that the last 2 managers have indulged in.
We need a simple attacking system that all the players buy into and consistent team selection and a manager with enough nous and courage to know when to change things when necessary. He needs to improve our setpieces.
Despite all the gloom and negativity we do have the basis of a decent side. We just need the right manager.
Keegan might have been capable of doing that. I have my doubts.
Charlton did it. He conveyed a simple message, motivated the players and changed things when needed.
Sanchez seemed to do this with the North. They didn't fear anyone, had a good team spirit and went out and got on with the job. As well as that they had a set of supporters who got right behind the team. I think that's important. Unfortunately, they missed out on qualification because of results against lesser teams e.g. Iceland.
I don't think Allardyce (one trick pony) or Houllier ( too conservative, but I could be wrong) would fit the bill.
Venables might do it but seem to remember him messing about with formations when he was with England.
Brady has no experience, but maybe he's learned from Wenger.
Coppell from everyone left is potentially the right man for the job.
1984 ffs!!! 24 years ago, John Toshack was far more successful in Spain then Tel boy but no one wants him either and rightly so.
It's Venables recent record that's the issue, I wouldn't give a toss about his finances if he'd cut it at any of his last 6 (count 'em) jobs.
I'd kill for Coppell at this stage as there but it'll be Venables, O'Leary and Souness were able to see through the bull**** we're expected to swallow straight away. Hope to God I'm wrong.
Will the FAI please hurry up.
Newstalk (ontheball) contacted O'Leary today to get his version of events. One of the 3 amigo's called O'Leary before christmas and asked him did he want to be interviewed. O'Leary told the amigo (allegedly Givens) in colourful language thanks but no thanks. On the same show Giles stated he did not want Houllier as manager. Also in answer to a question Giles stated that Brady should be one of the leading candidates. Failed at Celtic but got on well with the players.
Wake me up in about 6 months when this is all over. I think Roy was right. Maybe the FAI is procrastinating to save money.
I've just backed Terry Venables at odds of 7/2 to get the job, odds were too good to turn down.
Venables won the league with Barca, they're first in 11 years. BUT he is NOT fondly remembered at Camp Nou !
In fact winning La Liga had more to do with the brilliance of Schuster.
He is also remembered for signing Steve Archibald instead of Hugo Sanchez who went on to greater things in Madrid.
The betting exchanges can be easily manipulated. Place a large bet on one candidate. Then when the mob jumps on you lay against with a much higher stake than you originally bet. It happens a lot.
Does anyone know who has definitely been interviewed?
The Indo reported Vanables & McCarthy!!??!! were interviewed.
Hodgson was approached in some manner.
Anyone else...
Today's Guardian rules out O'Leary & Coppell and says Houllier is in the frame.
On Newstalk this morning they said a big gamble has gone on Houllier and he's now odds on with the bookies.
I just posted in another thread: London Independent says Houllier is close to agreeing terms!
So we can safely say at this stage it's Roddy Collins then?