Shir apart from the planes crashing into buildings on 9/11, there was nothing to report on that day.
Printable View
The ironic thing is that based on last season's performances Michael Rafter would have been the first player Waterford would have liked to see playing for Dundalk!
Maybe the FAI will re-open the Jeff McNamara case and find in favour of Waterford there. Seems more likely than them winning this case.
I was sitting beside the Dundalk fans and apart from the flare there wasn't any trouble that I could see. I had to walk through them to leave and there was no aggression whatsoever. The photos posted in previous pages are pretty unedifying but could any Blue say with a straight face that none of us would have acted the same had the roles been reversed? And much the same could be said of the appeal. There isn't a club in the league, nay, the world that wouldn't do the same thing. We saw how collegiate the clubs were when it was decided to keep the 12-team Premier Division to ensure "there is something to play for right up until the end of the season", i.e. woe betide the club that gets relegated to that! It's a dog-eat-dog world.
At the end of the day, Waterford did not earn the right to play in the premier league as they lost on the pitch. They can throw all the rules, regulations and bureaucracy around but do not deserve to play at a higher level.
No reason why a club, if they have a shred of evidence, shouldn't put in an objection/request for clarification, I'd be disappointed in Dundalk if the shoe was on the other foot not doing so. It looks like everything is in order and the club will stay up, with whatever that means for the future. It just leads more public/media/general attention to the idiocy that is a 7 team league. There can be no argument valid enough to block it apart from nest feathering or shortsightedness. Anyway, that's never going to happen with our football authorities and their members.
As for the clowns running to celebrate in front of opposition supporters, nothing we haven't seen before and nothing that will be dealt with in any decent way because clubs are afraid to lose followers. But from the photos, they're young enough to learn how to behave normally, just don't see how it can be done.
so whats happening? have the FAI rejected Waterford's objection, have they pulled it or has it still to be reviewed?
Our lads that wrecked & burned the Rsc last Friday V any estate rats from Waterford inner city in ultimate Street Countdown!
Our No.1 man here(prob not eligible though :rolleyes:)
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l9...hcfwo1_500.jpg
It's fairly obvious to anyone with an ear to the ground that Waterford will be in the Premier next year.
This whole farce just seems like such a shabby way of going about it.
Was told by a jouranlist earlier today that Waterford's claim is dead in the water, next weeks FAI discussion will be a formality to reject their claim,but ofcourse they will probably spend more money to appeal that.
Bray in trouble, decent club, would hate to go up at their expense, but, again,survival.
You expect other fans to be level headed when you want other clubs to be relegated/ go out of existence so your club can be "promoted" on a technicality?? I met a lot of Waterford fans after the game and in the town last Friday night and they were a sound bunch. I'm really glad I did or otherwise I'd be basing my opinion of the club on your opinions and that of your classless chairman.
The ony 'evidence' is the knowledge that Rafter played as a amateur for St Michaels in February before signing later that month for Dundalk.
Waterford sought clarification from the league and were told that Rafter was signed on a professional contract before the professional dealine and that therefore all was in order.
Obviously it is their perogative if they do not accept this clarification from the FAI and want to lodge an appeal, but it is clear to all involved that this is a wasted exercise.
What is the story with Bray?
I do not accept this. You were beaten fair and square on the pitch. You even beat your main rivals many times in the league and still couldn't finish ahead of them. Its pure bitterness and god knows the lenghts you went, timewise to trawl through registrations to find a glimmer of hope of trying to save yourself over a technicality, only for this to be officially rejected next week, and I think at this stage WUFC are probably admitting as much.
It has all the hallmarks of looking through dustbins for rubbish, and personally speaking I lost a lot of respect for your fine club in this latest attempt to 'save' yourself as you keep saying. The other plan was to threaten to pull out of the league if you had lost the play off. You had ample chances to 'save' yourself on the pitch during 2012 and in the first leg of the play off. Time to move on from this and plan your future. At least you will start as firm favourites in next seasons FD, another year is not the end of the world, we had 7 seasons in the FD before coming up in 2008.
If Dundalk had an improperly registered player, then they weren't beaten fair and square.
If my auntie had balls ... she'd be from Drogheda. Can see this thread running on needlessly for another few pages.
I heard from a Bray fan this week that the club has dramatically reduced its debt. They are still in debt but nothing that should see them drop out. Every year we hear Bray are fooked but they end up being fine so id expect no difference this time.
Some craic if Dundalk are found guilty and relegated. Maxi will have a field day.
I think MR A' point is if Waterford are right then you didn't win fair and square so that's why thy have objected as they believe they are or at least believed at the time of objecting they were right.
For them to think they were right and not object would be stupid on their part. It was in their eyes worth a punt.
It's seems in this case they were wrong which is fair enough, they will have to accept that and move on.