That's how I saw it too.
I was actually really impressed by parts of our performance last night.
I don’t understand the comments on Garvan. I thought he looked the real deal last night. In fact the biggest positive from last night was the performance of the midfield 3 who until they tired and the game got stretched were superb, more effective than their counterparts’ midfield. Huddlestone looked impressive for them , Noble and Muamba(?) less so.
However we just don’t have the players for 3 upfront. Clarke was totally anonymous throughout and was a waste of space sadly. Stokes and Keogh could make a good pairing but Stokes is wasted out wide. His attitude impressed me though, tackling back and being more inclusive than I’ve sometimes seen him.
I thought the Irish team showed great courage right from the start with the way they trusted their passing game and ball retention in midfield was impressive. Naturally it broke down in the final third. The key to 3 upfront is to have a predatory finisher flanked by two good wide men (Denmark’s was a good model when they used it: Tomasson flanked by Rommedahl and Lovenkrands). England had the pace out wide last night for the shape to work for them, we didn’t. Lennon was a class act and while I thought Walcott’s overall game was poor, his pace just by itself is a real asset.
Eddie Nolan impressed me. Good timing in the tackle, strong ball carrier but careless sometimes playing it up the line.
Lennon & Walcott made the difference but there were plenty of positives in the performance. O’Toole, Garvan & Quinn all have something to offer I reckon.