he hee he.
All, and none, of the above. TwiceQuote:
Is it sold, not sold, owned by Bohs or not?
HarristownQuote:
Where was the new area Bohs were to relocate to?
its largely irrelevant at this stage but it was a small tract of land that was sold over a boozy lunch by our esteemed leaders at the time. It was the first time we sold it by the way, not the second (wow do i feel stupid correcting this!)... it was that sale and our failure to produce complete title when we tried to sell the whole property that delayed and ultimately ended the deal going ahead. Idiotic.
"measured" is the perfect term A FACE, as it was actualy the size of the tract of land that caused all the subsequent problems (I dont get it either). The land Albion claimed to have a right/option over included a small portion of land subsequently covered by the Danninger deal, and it was this that prevented completion (with Danninger).
Latter deal certainly was the best option but once it went south the club were always in big trouble.
the best i hope for is to have a club to support next season. Unlikely unless we are rescued as we have shown we cannot rescue ourselves.
where would Bohs play if Dalymount was no longer available?
..genuine problem as I believe Shels only got a licence this season on the basis that they had option of using Dalymount if Tolka was withdrawn during the season.
Only options would be Morton or ground share with pats (until Kelleher pulls out and they end up as badly off) or UCD.
Could of course become new tenants in the SDCC stadium ;)
Despite the drop in building costs I cant see ourselves or Shels building anything anytime soon.