It's a short dart journey. Almost as bad as people going on about the unbelievable away support at Dublin derbies.
Printable View
There were 150, or thereabouts, Cliftonville supporters in Finn Park for our recent friendly. They remarked about how long the journey was, it was longer than their longest away trip of the upcoming NIFL season.
Same journey was shorter than Harps shortest journey of the season away to Longford. They were sure to add it's just another reason against the all-island league.
Agreed on the boring count but I suppose I fall on the side of thinking a lot of finals are quite poor games. It's a one off event that in a lot of cases can define a season. There's a nervous element and if it doesn't settle into an attacking game quickly it can become a bit of a stalemate. All that said it was actually the last game between the 2 that had over 30,000. So the neutrals may have been bored of it but the locals weren't
Why don't Harps apply to join the IL? :wink:
Though the LOI can keep them Derry wans :D
To be serious though, in my experience football fans are creatures of habit and who value tradition etc. So that the novelty of a trip to somewhere new soon wears off - esp if it involves a long or difficult trek - see eg the Setanta Cup.
Anyhow, until or unless the Summer vs Winter season calendar issue was resolved, then an All-Ireland league is off the table. (And that's only the most pressing issue which would need to be addressed - there are others)
Anyhow as you were, back to the FAI Cup.
Have Cliftonville fans really only just realised that Donegal is further from Belfast than anywhere they'd be going for a football game in NI? :D They're obviously not the Nordys who can afford the holiday homes in West Donegal then anyway.
The same Cliftonville fans, by the way. who will also tell you how big they are on the whole nationalism/republicanism thing :D
IL fans always wang on about the distances that would be involved in an All-Island League. They've been spoiled by having what has more often than not been essentially a three-county league. It's such a mediocre mindset. Let them join local amateur competitions if travelling is their big concern
Curiously enough, when Gerard Lawlor was the boss (Chairman?) at Cliftonville, he/his club were the most vocal of the bigger teams in opposing an all-Ireland league, while Linfield (and Glentoran?) were more amenable.
While since he has become CEO of the NIFL, Lawlor has been trying to push a Summer football agenda, which would appear to be a necessary prerequisite to any such league.
Meanwhile in a personal capacity, Lawlor was happy to be seen publicly endorsing his local SF candidate at last months election.
Anyhow, sorry for derailing this thread further off-topic - Mods may move/excise/delete this post as they see fit.
Most LOI threads get derailed by the nordy junior league for some reason.
It's just blatannt self-interest and protectionism from Cliftonville. They struggle to be a big fish In the IL, so would struggle even more in the LOI. Glentoran and Linfield presumably see big potential for themselves from playing in a bigger pond. Cliftonville just see risk/danger.
https://m.independent.ie/sport/socce...253494059.html
I mean, this feels a bit desperate. The FAI cleared him to play, so that should be that.
This made me smile:)
Couldn't care less if it's overturned or not,but delighted Rovers are arguing their case.
You can be damn sure if the roles were reversed we'd see that spanner bohs CEO out on hunger strike or a dirty protest on the phibsboro road, proclaiming the injustice of it all.
He’s our COO, that is he’s responsible for financial incomings and the day to day running.
**** all to do with him what the football side does that’s down to our DOF, Fenlon.
As someone mentioned , he was cleared to play so he played. No one had an inkling you could carry a red from the Mickey Mouse trophy four or five months ago into a game in another country, after you’ve been here six weeks or whatever, mental stuff.
If you’re that desperate and petty, go on ahead
and appeal it. Would expect nothing else from that ****ty club tbh
I couldn't care less about the cup but if we knocked bohs out in the stewards room I would **** myself laughing.
If bohs win the cup there will always be an *
Clearly, the carrot of a game in Mounthawk Park just proved too irresistible for Rovers!
If the shoe was on the other foot 100% Bohs would have appealed.
given FAI have signed off it’ll be like a yellow card appeal (I.e.no chance!) but we did get punished in 2006 with Oaul `shields I think after FAI clearance?!
but I can’t think of a sweeter cup win if they did throw Bohs out….. wining the cup having been knocked out by them ????
It’s a weird situation, his suspension came in a league cup competition, he then played 15(?) games for another club on loan. Moved here , played in the cup .
Surely if his card came in a league cup then he should serve a ban, however unfair, in a league competition and not an open cup competition? As we do not have a league cup like?
Nonsense ban anyhow.
Wouldn't be the first time the FAI got something wrong. I'm guessing Rovers have read the rules book and think they have a case
The English FA Regs
Transfer of Outstanding Suspensions
48 Where a Player, who is subject to an outstanding suspension arising from a sending-off offence in an EFL
Trophy Match, either:
48.1 remains registered to the same Club, but that Club becomes ineligible for or does not enter the EFL
Trophy; or
48.2 moves to a different Club that is ineligible or does not enter the EFL Trophy;
that period of suspension shall be transferred so that it may be served with reference to Matches other than
those in the EFL Trophy (to which the suspension originally applied).
Fifa regs
12 Enforcement of disciplinary sanctions
1.
Any disciplinary sanction of up to four matches or up to three months that has been
imposed on a player by the former association but not yet (entirely) served by the time
of the transfer shall be enforced by the new association at which the player has been
registered in order for the sanction to be served at domestic level. When issuing the ITC,
the former association shall notify the new association via TMS of any such disciplinary
sanction that has yet to be (entirely) served.
2.
Any disciplinary sanction of more than four matches or more than three months that
has not yet been (entirely) served by a player shall be enforced by the new association
that has registered the player only if the FIFA Disciplinary Committee has extended
the disciplinary sanction to have worldwide effect. Additionally, when issuing the ITC,
the former association shall notify the new association via TMS of any such pending
disciplinary sanction.
I'm not sure there was an obligation to transfer the suspension under FIFA rules since it was a 3 match ban and the regs specify 4 matches or 3 months which I assume refers to the length of suspension being 3 months rather than the length of time it takes to enforce.
Nah its obviously either 3 months or 4 matches , so either time or number of mathces. Neither is related to the other.
For example when Cantona was banned for 9 months (i think) they didnt say 9 months or 30 matches.
Devoy had a ban which he hadnt served, hence the appeal.
It would be embarressing for the FAI to have cleared him in the wrong so will they pull back???
be interestig but the FAI have a history of bending the rules to prevent embarressing themselves
"Rovers asked me 'Can we be the 17th team in the FAI Cup 3rd round?'. They did. They asked me this."
16th ;)
Kerry were away to Cork last night. Disappointing and sloppy goals conceded. Kerry are away to second placed Athlone next. Good tests ahead of the third round.
Athone also signed Alex "Timmy" Byrne. Former Galway Utd centre half/ centre mid. Decent First Division player. He was out in Canada the past few years. I'd love it if they got promoted! I think Kerry will struggle against them next week
Sunday 18th of August at 4pm confirmed for Kerry v Bohs - would have imagined the home side would have preferred a Friday night KO, but at least they can get the preparations underway.
This is a mandatory FIFA reg which all associations must adopt. Adds another dimension to the Bohs/Rovers case.
4. A sending-off automatically incurs suspension from the subsequent match.
The FIFA judicial bodies may impose additional match suspensions and other
disciplinary measures.
If the fai play fair I think Rovers win this but as we've seen with the sending off appeals this year their appeals system.os a joke