That was in response to Ezekiel throwing in an unrelated thread derailing issue. No issue with any club partnering with any worthwhile charity .
Printable View
That was in response to Ezekiel throwing in an unrelated thread derailing issue. No issue with any club partnering with any worthwhile charity .
If you say so but prior and now in this spat your perspective on some other fundraisers has been that of contempt. So claiming only a riposte to a single post that mirrors previously dismissive scorn is a stretch! You were selective also when responding to a jibe and ignoring the praise. So must have struck a nerve with you as you obviously did with myself as I simply dislike the dismissive tone of what is and should be seen as positive endeavour!
I think Bohs shirt sponsor is just an excuse to derail another foot.ie thread.
Waterford announced yesterday they will be wearing a kit with a message supporting the campaign for full time cardiac emergency care at Waterford university hospital. Jerseys to be unveiled during the week.
No. Lee Power released a statement yesterday saying they did have offers of shirt sponsorship which were less than they got last year from Spin casino. He put that down to loss of European football. They decided to go with promoting the cardiac care campaign message instead. Some fans actually suggested to do this on Facebook a while back.
Fair play to Waterford and Bohs for standing up for what's right and being positive forces in their communities.
No disrespect to bohs, but if Waterford have this on their jerseys, and forfeit a sponsor, do we all not have to look at ourselves and think
Waterford do have sponsor on the shirt albeit at the back of the shirt (Viking), obviously isn’t worth the same financially as the front of the shirt. But the 24/7 care on the front of the shirt is a brilliant gesture from club. Something that’s been received very well locally.
Harps away shirt:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ERJIH0QX...jpg&name=large
Is it really a case of Waterford forfeiting a sponsor though ? Is it not more a case that they couldn't get a main sponsor (or at least not one paying any decent money) so have rightly gone with this route instead, rather than leave their shirt blank ?
It was very noticeable that they were the only shirt without a sponsor in the photos from the league launch at Abbotstown.
Its probably smart business two ways.
If they allowed a front of jersey sponsorship for small money it devalues every other layer of sponsorship , rear of jersey, sleeves , hoardings etc etc.
By going with a charity option this year it might mean next year they get a sponsorship that makes financial sense and better on a multi year basis.
In the meantime they get the kudos for supporting the community which might encourage more people to buy into the club.
Absolutely gorgeous
https://twitter.com/CorkCityFC/statu...381327872?s=19
By all accounts its divided opinion. But I personally think it's the nicest out of the recent red kits we've had.
That Cork kit is awful. The shorts are a different red to the top.
Better than Derry I suppose, suffering the indignity of not having our new home ready for the season and not likely to have it for a few weeks yet.
Yeah, I really like it.
Real Ale - how about a poll? Settle this once and for all! :)
I think it looks great. Not with plain red shorts though.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ERPJ8npV...jpg&name=small
Derry's new home kit, will get a run out tonight
Bit late in the day, but they had away kit out for christmas. So hope this is based on new template
Looks the same as the old one
Ever so slight changes far as I can see. Adidas logo is now black instead of red and the three stripes have gone from under the arm to the shoulder and there's a red collar instead of white.
That's it really..