And you'll notice I didn't ask you to stop trying to go off topic.
(Although, FWIW, I don't agree with your grammatical analysis. I think it is 2009 figures that're being talked about)
Printable View
Dont know if thats true in reality, previos leakings of Bohs accounts and subsequent analysis of those accounts by not just Rovers fans but journalists have made everthing about the running of that clubs affairs a public intrest story .Bohs asking for a postponment of mondays meeting in the wake of an 11th hour six figure payment to Fenlon also fuels speculation.It does get a bit tabloid at times but its news all the same and when Bohs are awarded the licence and get a clean bill of health it will no longer be anything to speculate about,but till then it will go on.
Theres just no tabloid or Rovers forum story in "Bohs aim to break even shocker".
no RH, the problem is it will be speculated on even if we do get a license. Thats where my issue lies. I dont think any club gets a clean bill of health in this league. But even if we do get a license we will be expected to answer questions here from the usual suspects.
And it wasnt a six figure sum to Fenlon. The amount we paid is in the public domain, i suggest you go and find it and educate yourself properly if youre so interested in Bohs finances.
But im sure you lot will just carry on with your half-truths, rumous and innuendo.
Maybe that's why you're an accountant. ;)
I would also be surprised if journalists had access to such detailed breakdowns of clubs' 2009 accounts at this early stage seeing as they were only submitted to the FAI on Nov 30? I could be wrong though.
Well the answer is no, so no.
I think he may be right. The follow up sentence about clubs going in on a healthier position this year, suggests that those figues are from the previous year.
Plus, theres no way even the FAI would expect anyone to swallow that boez could be under the SCP while still losing 2 million quid.
Very much intrested in Bohs accounts and still curious at your request to postpone the meeting in light of Pats payoff regardless of the figure. would not be a massive shock to bohs fans if you had lost 1.89mill last season and Luko over playes the new board members ,Gerrys crew still run the show at Dalymount just ask any of the posters on Bohs private forum .
He wasn't making an allegation.. All he was saying was that IF Bohs have being doing something dodgy, people on here well be going on about how they were right all along. But if Bohs get their license without a hitch, those same people will claim it's only because the FAI didn't punish them for something or other...
In my opinion i think the reason the FAI postponed the meeting with bohs until next week is beacuse they fully intend to fail bohs attempts to get past the 65% issue and thus they will issue sanctions against bohs that could range from points deduction at the beginning of the season to relegation to the discover ireland league. They are quite happy to let bohs hang themselves with their own perceived inadequecies.
thats a completly uninformed opinion by the way and is not an allegation against bohs . its just a hunch.
The clean up of this league began with derry, is about to sweep up cork and is all set to snare the current league champions.
Again , just a hunch and my own personal opinion.
cannot wait for the football season to start. sick of all the talking.
Bohs requested the postponement but carry on.
and it was accepted for the reasons stated in the thread above. maybe
sure. :)
Well my theory is that Bohs are in fact the FAI and that all the other teams are in fact the GAA. I would surmise that the FAI (Bohs) bought Dalymount Park back in 1832 for the princely sum of 2d and 4 and rented it back to Bohs (the FAI) on a long term lease of a bag of potatoes once Bohs (the FAI) moved out of Croke Park to let Shamrock Rovers (the GAA) move in for the price of an apartment in Milltown. Ever since then Bohs (the FAI) have been representing Ireland on the international front cleverly half disguised as Glasgow Celtic (the only true Irish football team) and the other half Shamrock Rovers (the GAA) in order to appease the Catholic Church.
This has quietly been forgotten while such disintegration as the Spain in Paris question, the dodgy free kick to Belgium in 198..., Paul Marney affair, Shelsgate, Saipan, the French question and the death of Michael Jackson have taken place and is now only coming to a head because somebody forgot to send Sean Connor's red pantaloons to Dundalk before he took up the position of God at Oriel Park.
It is quite obvious to me and others here apparently that Bohs (the FAI) are cheating because they proved that by winning the league for the last two years along with the FAI Cup and in fact the nail in the coffin was when they (Bohs) won the Derry City Cup down in Waterford against the wishes of Waterford and the general population of the GAA while the FAI and Bohs were in cahoots to move the match there for a bag of beans which in fact did turn out to be a substantial lottery win.
THAT my friends is why Bohs should be relegated and the running of the League of Ireland should be left to the Scientologists and the GAA.
Duh.
They could have just asked. ;) It'd explain why there's no figures for Cork*. It also doesn't make sense to be so secretive about 2008's figures when they're publicly available for many clubs.
* - Which actually makes me realise the article is possibly Delaney trying to show he's arrested the losses in the league cos 2009 is the same as 2008, but that's 2009 less Cork City is the same as 2008.**
** - And obviously that's out the window if it is 2008 being talked about.
I thought Galways budget was supposed to be very low ?
There seems to be some mixed messages.
I recall Nick Leeson saying in early December that they had to sort it out, and it could be anywhere from zero to €175k. Further talk (which could have been from Sean Connor!) about a major sponsorship form a local businessman.
In the interview with SC on another thread, he says that Shaun Kelly is joining them on Tuesday for training. I imagine Kelly would want a contract at a cost of about €28k to €30k.
Can any Galway fans clarify latest on budget?
Reported in todays mail that the FAI rejected Bohs projected budget for this season.
It was reported that a Bohs official said the changes required "were not unmanagable". So the player registartion embargo remains in place for now.
bhs
BTCWD, Im just wondering which of your many Nostradamus like predictions you are referring to?
This one?
[QUOTE=BYCTWD;1305411]It is my understanding that they have. Which means that bohs, who were budgeting to win all three domestic trophies, will have to readjust down at least €250,000, or 5k a week on wages.
The "Nutsy is gone to Dundeee United on a two year contract"
The prediction that Bohs would include Albion payments in the 2009 SCP figures?
The points deduction prediction for Bohs breaching the 65% in 2009?
If its the prediction that it would take Bohs a month to get through the budget approval processs for 2010, then you are on the money.....for once. Congratulations, give that man a trophy, he hasn`t seen one in sixteen years.
If you get board with the I told you so stuff on here ,check out the comedy gold on Gypo webs. budget rejected thread.:D
beaumontbohs
'A' Team Regular
Joined: 19 Sep 2006
Posts: 286
ASBOH wrote:
Daily Mail wrote:
Meanwhile, Bohemians must re-submit their budget for the new season after the FAI rejected their proposal yesterday.
A club source said last night that there was 'nothing unmanageable' in the changes that were required for the champions but as things stand, Bohs can't register their signings for the new season.
All the more annoying when a certain club owed a seven figure sum and got away with it . Then the council give them a free ground and moral high ground
a big hello from all at Rovers ;):D:)
What a nuts way to do a budget!Quote:
Bohs were only allowed to factor league prize money of €40,000 -- the amount available to the team that finishes last in the Premier Division -- into their figures, although they were previously planning to account for a finish of no worse than third in the table.
It really does show though that the FAI need to sort out the prize money situation. It should taper far more gradually from top to bottom. Currently there is far too much incentive to gamble on it.
I don't think that Bohs budgeting for coming third is massively unreasonable though.
No it doesn't. That potentially punishes other clubs for no reason.
Financial projections should be done on a prudent basis, whatever business you are in.
Doing it on the minimum guaranteed prize amount is probably a bit harsh, but given Bohs (like Derry and many other clubs) have shown an inability to adhere to previous budgets, its no surprise they are being given limited scope to use their own judgment.