Originally Posted by
Stuttgart88
I think McShane will do fine in due course.
However, if there's one lesson that, in my mind anyway, is becoming increasingly obvious from the Stan regime it's that playing players just because they are young and promising and likely to be the best player in that position in the future is wrong.
In McShane's case it was slightly different. He was played mainly because we had nobody else. Dunne is our clear number 1 CB and Andy O'Brien was out of form and out of favour at his club. O'Shea was probably next in line but was needed to fill gaps elsewhere (both full back positions & centre-mid). The only other options for the role are the likes of St. Leger, McCarthy, Bruce, Joey O'Brien (makeshift choice) and O'Dea. All of these are relative rookies too. McShane has done reasonably well but has been prone to slips and lapses in concentration.
If we were playing a competitive game tomorrow I'd have O'Brien or O'Shea in beside Dunne. Only when a younger player is a better player should he be in the team. If he's no longer U21 eligible have him in the squad. If he's U21 play him in the U21s and build for a successful future that way. If he's U21 only if he's exceptional or worthy of a place on merit should he be with the seniors. McGeady for example. Maybe/probably also Joey O'Brien.
I personally would be tempted to look at Garvan in this context. Gibson should be in the U21s, along with Andy Keogh, Shane Long & Anthony Stokes.