Rovers Accounts

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

12/08/2010, 12:29 PM
passerrby

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopy

Invariably wrong? You know quite well we've been right all along about what you're board we're doing but you all just buried you're heads up your collective arses and denied everything. Tony Maguire was a disgrace as our Chairman, leaving small businesses without payment etc. But we stopped funding the club, forcing him and his cohorts out, and started from scratch again. Your members will be asked once again to fund the idiots in charge of your club and once again the sheep will obey through fear, instead of facing facts. The fact that we 'went down the toilet' and are back at the top again is surely something to be proud of, so who wants to rewrite history? And as members we'll have the balls to ensure the club never goes back to the dark days under the previous board. Ps, the jealousy and bitterness does exist from you, whatever you say on here, because of where both our clubs are going. Nothing to do with 'history'. Btw, glad to see Sundays hiding is still fresh on your mind :D

not been smart but seriously are rovers supporters re-writing history ..i mean thats not how i remember events
12/08/2010, 1:05 PM
hoopy

The only reason Fenlon isn't at Dundee is because your board decided not to let him go. Nothing wrong with that. But the info that he wanted to go wasn't wrong. Ask Roddy Collins why he couldn't get money for players, and that was long before relegation so you're wrong there again. And again I say it, if you want to use the word jealous, then I've no doubt you most definately are. I'm very proud to be part of a group who've done what has to be done. I'd love to be able to show you this year's figures but unlike your club, we've no leaks. Hope for your player's wages' sake that Tommy Allen sold a lot more medicines this week :pirate:
12/08/2010, 1:07 PM
hoopy

Quote:

Originally Posted by passerrby

not been smart but seriously are rovers supporters re-writing history ..i mean thats not how i remember events

Not sure I understand the question. Are we re-writnig history, not how I remember it?
12/08/2010, 1:22 PM
Dodge

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopy

I'd love to be able to show you this year's figures but unlike your club, we've no leaks.

You have. All clubs do. Nothing malicious in mates showing their mates anything of LOI interest.
12/08/2010, 1:34 PM
marinobohs

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopy

The only reason Fenlon isn't at Dundee is because your board decided not to let him go. Nothing wrong with that. But the info that he wanted to go wasn't wrong. Ask Roddy Collins why he couldn't get money for players, and that was long before relegation so you're wrong there again. And again I say it, if you want to use the word jealous, then I've no doubt you most definately are. I'm very proud to be part of a group who've done what has to be done. I'd love to be able to show you this year's figures but unlike your club, we've no leaks. Hope for your player's wages' sake that Tommy Allen sold a lot more medicines this week :pirate:

Are we not discussing shams figures on this thread ? This years figures not finalised yet (you lot are waiting on the Tippex presumably - but hey no doubt the FAI will cover it up again :cool:)
Unlike the so called model club bohs do pay players wages - feel free to ask Roddy about that. still cant figure what I am jealous about - Renting a ground ? won nothing for decades ? feel free to let me know.
12/08/2010, 1:44 PM
marinobohs

Quote:

Originally Posted by dcfcsteve

G....

Agreed dcfcsteve should have known it was impossible to discuss anything to do with the Shams without righteous indignation pouring out of every post (and a little history editing). Time to move on.........:rolleyes:
12/08/2010, 1:45 PM
pineapple stu

If it's boring you steve, don't open the thread. Like, duh...
12/08/2010, 1:47 PM
Rasputin

How come when Shams are having a pop at Bohs its just "an inside track" or other such drivel.
But when anyone else has a pop against Shams its one of the following "bitterness, jealousy or bitterness"?
12/08/2010, 1:59 PM
hoopy

Quote:

Originally Posted by marinobohs

Are we not discussing shams figures on this thread ? This years figures not finalised yet (you lot are waiting on the Tippex presumably - but hey no doubt the FAI will cover it up again :cool:)

You're embarrassing yourself because you can't get over Sunday's humiliation. However FAI cover up/Tippex is hilarious. You've obviously forgotten that Bohs cheated the 65% for every week bar the last one last season. What I always find funny as well regarding the ground situation is that Bohs fans either don't know or choose to ignore how they were handed Dalymount themselves. I was shown a copy of a post yesterday taken from the Bohs forum from a genuine bloke trying to help his club out by continuing to tell the truth. Apparently it's not the first time and he's always been treated with disdain. It's sad to see someone like that go to bat for a shower of total fools. :disappointed:
12/08/2010, 2:02 PM
hoopy

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rasputin

How come when Shams are having a pop at Bohs its just "an inside track" or other such drivel.
But when anyone else has a pop against Shams its one of the following "bitterness, jealousy or bitterness"?

It's just something we have to get used to :party:
12/08/2010, 2:25 PM
marinobohs

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopy

You're embarrassing yourself because(1) you can't get over Sunday's humiliation. However FAI cover up/Tippex is hilarious. You've obviously forgotten that Bohs(2) cheated the 65% for every week bar the last one last season. What I always find funny as well regarding (3) the ground situation is that Bohs fans either don't know or choose to ignore how they were handed Dalymount themselves. I was shown a copy of (4) a post yesterday taken from the Bohs forum from a genuine bloke trying to help his club out by continuing to tell the truth. Apparently it's not the first time and he's always been treated with disdain. It's sad to see someone like that go to bat for a shower of total fools. :disappointed:

(1) Only one mentioning sunday (ad nauseum) is you. no trophy for it. (2) bohs broke no rules unlike the tallaght forgers (according to the football authority - the FAI) (3) our ground - something shams cant say since 1980's (and probobly never will again. (4) "a post" - out of how many posts on that site ??? thinest, most silly point in a long time (and to be fair you have raised the bar in silly points) quoting ONE post ??????

Getting boring now so as I have adressed all the ramblings you call points i think its time we all moved on....:o
12/08/2010, 2:34 PM
hoopy

Quote:

Originally Posted by marinobohs

(1) Only one mentioning sunday (ad nauseum) is you. no trophy for it. (2) bohs broke no rules unlike the tallaght forgers (according to the football authority - the FAI) (3) our ground - something shams cant say since 1980's (and probobly never will again. (4) "a post" - out of how many posts on that site ??? thinest, most silly point in a long time (and to be fair you have raised the bar in silly points) quoting ONE post ??????

Getting boring now so as I have adressed all the ramblings you call points i think its time we all moved on....:o

No, I want you to keep roofjumping. On the ground, considering you lot keep saying we got a ground 'handed to us', why don't you tell the good people on here how Bohs came to own Dalymount? On the post, that was my point! It's sad from a Bohs perspective that so few people had the courage to stand up to Conway. On the game on Sunday, all you're bitching all week is because you can't get over it and you're club is dying a death. Have to say though you do make the odd funny comments like Bohs broke no rules. It's all in the past though, what counts is the future. Well for us anyway.
12/08/2010, 2:41 PM
R�iteoir

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopy

No, I want you to keep roofjumping. On the ground, considering you lot keep saying we got a ground 'handed to us', why don't you tell the good people on here how Bohs came to own Dalymount? On the post, that was my point! It's sad from a Bohs perspective that so few people had the courage to stand up to Conway. On the game on Sunday, all you're bitching all week is because you can't get over it and you're club is dying a death. Have to say though you do make the odd funny comments like Bohs broke no rules. It's all in the past though, what counts is the future. Well for us anyway.

Like the cleaning of a house... It Never Ends.
With Gabriella DeFarge as Gabriella St. Farge. Allegra Hamilton as Sister Bernadette and Roxy Monoxide. And as Dr. Tad Winslow... Moe Szyslak.
12/08/2010, 2:47 PM
hoopy

Quote:

Originally Posted by R�iteoir

Like the cleaning of a house... It Never Ends.
With Gabriella DeFarge as Gabriella St. Farge. Allegra Hamilton as Sister Bernadette and Roxy Monoxide. And as Dr. Tad Winslow... Moe Szyslak.

And Hitler as Bohs chairman :D
12/08/2010, 2:53 PM
marinobohs

Quote:

Originally Posted by R�iteoir

Like the cleaning of a house... It Never Ends.
With Gabriella DeFarge as Gabriella St. Farge. Allegra Hamilton as Sister Bernadette and Roxy Monoxide. And as Dr. Tad Winslow... Moe Szyslak.

Yea Reiteoir, but you got to laugh, the longer it goes on the more deranged the stuff spouted (roofjumping ??????WTF) and this by the way is a thread about "Rovers accounts". Anyone else recall last year when Bohs accounts were under the microscope how any mention of shams was infarcted (Yep, that was you P STU). nice to see the rules "relaxed" when it comes to the model club dragging bohs in.......
12/08/2010, 3:26 PM
passerrby

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopy

Not sure I understand the question. Are we re-writnig history, not how I remember it?

it appears that your posters over the last few years seem to imply that you somehow saved the club throught shrewd planning ,wise council and forward planning when in fact you landed in the **** and came out smelling of roses
12/08/2010, 3:32 PM
dcfcsteve

Quote:

Originally Posted by pineapple stu

If it's boring you steve, don't open the thread. Like, duh...

It's like a car crash, or when they warn you on TV that some ugly scenes are about to be shown on the news.

You know it's wrong, but you just can't help but look....
12/08/2010, 6:42 PM
Mario

Boo-hoo to some of the holier than holy waffle on this thread.

Often its forgotten that football is largely a cash business.

Herald claimed last year of a player "earning" 50 quid getting more on the sly.

Shame the author wouldnt expose the club and player involved.
12/08/2010, 6:51 PM
Mario

Quote:

Originally Posted by passerrby

it appears that your posters over the last few years seem to imply that you somehow saved the club throught shrewd planning ,wise council and forward planning when in fact you landed in the **** and came out smelling of roses

You are wrong there passerby, the 400 club in effect forced the club into administration by refusing the hand over any more of the susbscriptions until certain questions were answered and assurances given.

These answers etc were promised but never came ...

In the meantime the subs kept rolling in and thats where the 250,000 ish used to buy half the club along with Ray Wilson came from!
12/08/2010, 7:35 PM
dfx-

I really like how mb doesn't address a single point of hoopy's and that passerrby added "in fact" to no fact whatsoever :)

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page