A circular transaction?:cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
Printable View
A circular transaction?:cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
I dont think it at all stupid that Danninger might claim that your undisclosed agreement with Albion prevented them closing the deal and making x millions of euro thus contributing to Danningers current predicament Marino do you ?How this could play out is still unknown and could mean further court visits for you lot so Im not sure your board are in controll of your future at all but what would be of major concern is the complete reluctance to cut your cloth.
if thats really what you think is going to happen with Danninger then youre even more deluded than i thought.
If youre on a wind up... try harder.
your prefered option is still to sell your ground to a bankrupt company ,while going further into debt in the meantime to chase prize money at the end of another season to cover up more cheating on the 65% cap.and Im the deluded one?nobody knows how Danningers affairs will be dealt with but your board are borrowing on the strenght of a chance that it might work out in your favour.
no theyre not. Do some research (e.g. read this thread).
This place could do with a serious amount of common sense, would get rid of 95% of the posts on here.Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
Not sure why I'm bothering but just for a start have a look at all the fundraising money being handed over to the club in one lump sum, look at the prize money for winning the league.
Stu, we were under the SCP in November, like it or not we know a lot more about the ins and outs of our club than you or anyone else on here does. If there was any doubt from the Dalymount that we were over the SCP you'd have heard about it by now from some loud mouthed member, but we're not. Can this now be the end of it until an official announcement is made?
Surely you don't beleive that "an official announcement" is going to quieten things down?Quote:
Originally Posted by Leejo
I think it is fair to say that most interested observors have no doubt that Bohemians have, at a minimum, blatently disregarded the spirit of the SCP. Whether the FAI have the desire or the ability to apply sanctions is really what remains to be seen.
It seems to me that many, including the Bohs board, have concluded that they don't have the stomach for it.
Also it's the off-season.. We've nothing else to talk about :p
How?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ezeikial
*can of worms opened*
Its impossible to breach the SCP midseason. Only the Star have claimed that the Albion losses are going to be used to get us under the 65%.Quote:
Originally Posted by BYCTWD
Err,Quote:
Originally Posted by de bowez
No it ain't.
That why ourselves, you lot and a few others had transfer embargoes implemented mid season.
Nope, its because the FAI felt that if we continued at the rate we were going we would finish the season over it.Quote:
Originally Posted by MariborKev
I don't think any club that says mid season that they need European progression and a league title to get under 65% can with any credibility claim to be in compliance with the spirit of the rule.
Not sure how its so hard to believe that the FAI knew that Bohs were in danger of breaching the SCP after going through the accounts?Quote:
Originally Posted by BYCTWD
Semantics.
At the start of the season each club prepares a monthly budget that must, on an aggregate basis, be in compliance with the SCP.
Clubs then submit monthly management accounts that are tracked against the budget.
I would imagine that at some point Bohs management accounts diverged wildly from their budget leading to a high risk that they would fail to meet the year-end SCP. Ergo the FAI took action to limit further costs being incurred that would further reduce the chances of the SCP being met (through transfers).
Whether or not they were in breach at points throughout the year is neither here nor there.
But without wanting to repeat myself too much, discussing the SCP in the context of Bohs is re-arranging the deckchairs on the Titantic. A bit like the Derry fans thinking the dual contract issue and all the smokescreens around that was important, when the club was sliding under in the background.
So, if bohs are found to breach the rule it is because they are guilty but if they are found not to have broken the rule it is because the FAI are covering up the fact they are guilty ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ezeikial
Typical of the stupid nonsense posted by some on this thread :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
True, of course. But in November, Bohs had no home games and presumably accrued some title-winning bonuses, which would make it even harder again to get under the 65% cap through any means other than prize money and the Albion money.Quote:
Originally Posted by osarusan
Fenlon had to go round D7 with a begging bowl to try and fund an overnight stay in derry at the end of last season ,prize money won was used in the mad scramble to bring you under 65% along with outstanding transfer money due.So if you want to believe that your Debt wont increase this season off you go.Quote:
Originally Posted by SkStu
Yea, and we need to save for the Danninger court case ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by RoversHead
Quote:
Originally Posted by BYCTWD
Yeah,
Some of posted by LukeO etc seems bang on.