Can't cut minimum wage. If employee is part-time on say, a 3-day week, he needs it to be at current levels.Quote:
Originally Posted by pete
Printable View
Can't cut minimum wage. If employee is part-time on say, a 3-day week, he needs it to be at current levels.Quote:
Originally Posted by pete
I think that's just the basic dole there, there would be additions. But you are not comparing like with like. The cost of living is much cheaper (hence the exodus to Newry and Enniskillen for the shopping), and the NHS/ Prescription charges are much lower. The comparison with a country that's had the guts of 3 decades of Governments attacking social welfare isn't the example I'm comfortable to use.
What jobs? The only encouragement would be towards re-training and education. The training is being hit by budget cuts and recruitment embargos and they're just about to introduce fees for 3rd level.
It was inflation that drove up the minimum wage, not the other way around. Funny how it's people who have no prospect of ever having to survive on the minimum wage that are always the ones that want it cut...Quote:
Originally Posted by pete
your maintenance is another issue and nothing got to do with the social, and no its not fair at all
You obviously haven't read my posts - I am maintaining that the social welfare is far too high! It is costing the country far too much. Of course people are entitled to it if they dont have a job.
20 billion social welfare budget!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !:mad:
The EU or the IMF will have to bail is out - thats a given - watch this space
and there has already been grumblings from the Germans about our social welfare system (and about the expenses our politicians ratch up) - considering it will be them that will be footing the bill (as always)
Again its all back to the greed of this country - we want the government to hold our hands and wipe our............. and then we criticize them all the time!!!
I don't expect anything from this government and hence am never disappointed!
Please can you answer me this question - how would one spend more than 200 every week
I work and my wife works and we wouldn't spend that nearly between us!
[QUOTE=bennocelt;1140426]
Please can you answer me this question - how would one spend more than 200 every week
Living
Well by the time you have got 2 slabs of carling paid for your smack and fags done a few bets there is very little left out of 200 euro.
I actually agree with you i think the jobseekers allowance ( stamps ) is ok left at 204 as your after paying your PRSI for long enough for just that reason. But for the basic Dole to be 200 euro is a bit high. If you have no mortage or rent worth talking about then 200 is loads.
The dole is a safety net so you can pay for food and bills if you want to go for a drink or smoke they are luxuries so you need to get a job.
[QUOTE=bennocelt;1140444
and LOI tickets are "only" 15 quid but if your on the social you get in for free!!!:)[/QUOTE]
If only the standard was anyway good , then this would be incentive enough to quit my job. :)
I can only assume those talking about €200 being loads mustn't be in the position of having a family, mortgage, car loan etc.
The point I was making is that a single mother who's never worked is entitled to whatever extra's on the social for having kids plus childrens allowance, but because my daughter does not live with me I'm entitled to nothing but the basic plus I still have to hand over 60 out of that
so it is to do with the social welfare system. IMO the system favours single mothers not single fathers
Nobody yet has managed to demonstrate how €200 a week isn't enough without bringing in kids, rent etc. which all entitle you to separate additional benefits which SIGNIFICANTLY increase what you get from the state.
Macy's point about commitments like loans which can't be changed in the short-term is a valid one, but income protection insurance is specifically aimed at this.
Think they are on about the long term unemployed getting the dole rather than someone who has just lost their job. Some one that has just lost there job that has a mortgage car loans family etc then no 200 euro isnt enough but its better than nothing.
But if some one that hasnt worked for 4 or 5 years goes and gets a car loan and mortage while all ready trying to support a family then that person is an idiot.
Thing is BGR if you were working and the child stays with you at least once in any 12 month period you are entitled to the same tax relief as a married man.
This is the equivalent of the mother receiving the single family supplement.
I agree with you on the allowances and such, you are not entitled to these if the main residence of the child is the mothers home. By definition a single parent allowance is because the child is being raised by one parent from a monetary aspect.
I myself am in the same position as you . I pay alot a month to my child's mother . Agreed when we split up without court involvement.This is off set by my tax relief . Though it is difficult when having a mortgage, running a car, paying my bills and insurances. Her mother is entitled to Single family allowance , chid welfare allowance , social housing and is allowed to work for 20 hours a week without any of her allowances being affected.
Thankfully I have a good job but I do worry that if anything happens to it , where I'll stand . You are correct the system is more favoured to the mother in these situations but it does reward and recognise those fathers that are are working and paying towards their childs upkeep. It is all relative to your income. I recently heard of a bloke who brought a girl to court because he beleived he was paying too much child maintainace for his daughter, €30 a week , the judged laughed at him and ordered him to pay €50 a week.
sorry but having a mortgage shouldn't come into it at all - thats not the responsibility of the state
http://www.rte.ie/news/2009/0409/inflation.html
funny that:)
It should, especially if the state is paying rent allowance (but makes gives no allowance for mortgage).
Pity you didn't read the link to the CSO. Year on Year, Food and Non-alcoholic beverages down only 0.5% (same month on month), general goods and services up 9.1%, Beer and smokes up 5.9%, Education up 5.5%, Health up 4.7%. Most of the decrease is down to mortgage rates which doesn't effect everyone (either no mortgage or on a fixed rate), and reductions in home heating oil (little use now as we come into summer).
If you look deeper at some of the year on year decreases, like clothing & shoes and transport, they're actually starting to go back up again in the month on month figures.
I aint going back to look, but I think I said looking at the headline rate can be misleading, didn't I?
The bottom line is that all other thing being equal (note to everyone trying to compare apples and oranges), you shouldn't be better off on social welfare than in fulltime employment.
Yet that's exactly what this budget will do. And that's wrong, morally financially and any other way you want to look at it.
The social welfare bill, is comprised of all levels of social welfare, not limited to JA/JB.Quote:
Originally Posted by bennocelt
I can't see any bailouts from outsiders for at least 5 years. We have our EU membership, we have the Eurozone, so it's like standing in a bus shelter in a thunderstorm. There is a degree of protection for EU states in the current crisis, including Ireland.
I'd have no problem paying income levies, as I'd have a job. JA/JB is the lowest possible rung of the economic ladder though, and should be the very very last area to take a hit, instead of the first.