well at the risk of turning this into a politics debate, i dont think Fine gael or even labour would have done much different had they been in power. theyre all part of the status quo, a product of the rotton status quo (system).
Printable View
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=politics.ieQuote:
well at the risk of turning this into a politics debate, i dont think Fine gael or even labour would have done much different had they been in power. theyre all part of the status quo, a product of the rotton status quo (system).
we all have our opinions let foot.ie be the last safe haven from the ongoing political madness.
I like Status Quo.
This thread's gone down down, deeper and down....
Sorry... couldn't resist... hope the funny pills kick in soon....
We've had no news from the Fingal bunker. WE wait.
Maybe someone could check up every tree in North Dublin for Buckley?
Arent you a shels fan Bonnie? why are you waiting on news from fingal?
Events at Fingal in no way affect any other club's survival prospects at all.
The scenario you mention has nothing to do with Gannon pulling the plug on funding for one club. The league survived Dublin City going under, and if Fingal follow suit, the league will still survive.
Pineapple I agree with you in principle, however overall it will further hurt the credibility and long term viability of the league. Football is a business as well as entertainment, I don't need to draw parallels with either industry to porve this point. One clubs demise, while causing more internet warriors to splash out in harmony than when they watch tv after the watershed, will not matter much, short term, though that is what is killing the league, short term thinking and long term damage. UCD will survive in some shape or form as the taxpayer and alumni will allow for good players interested in getting a qualification while picking up a few quid, while facilities in Belfield are also a good attraction (as well as good coaching). However other clubs will not be so lucky and in the longer term more will fall by the wayside as less and less people with disposable income or who want managed investments will look to the league. So sure, the league will survive, like a cockroach.
I see the FAI as the Mammy Coackroach, the LOI as the son that's locked up in the cellar because he's a bit weird, while the LOI clubs are the little baby cockroaches who cannibalise each other "going forward" and feed off the waste of their siblings. There's no loyalty in this segment of the ecosystem as it's cockroach eat cockroach. Sorry, listening to Morning Ireland as I type :-) going forward
folks, we are currently cruising approximately 15,000 feet above the head of the average foot.ie user. thank you, and enjoy the flight.
Of course it will. However, that ignores the fact that this happening to Fingal was an inevitability given the way they were set up. So that particular Sword of Damocles, it looks like, will soon be removed. If it's inevitable, best to get it out of the way as soon as possible so we can move on.
The rest of your post seems to ignore the fact that Fingal's set-up is different to every other club in the league.
Pineapple, agreed on the Swords of Damocles, agreed that no matter what it's best to just get it over with (whatever the result) and move on. However how can you say I'm ignoring the Fingal set up, the post is about the credibility of the LOI. Do you think an investor will think twice about putting money into, for example, Monaghan over Galway when the financial viability and sustainability of the LOI is completely without sense or credibility? The model held up regularly is Rosenborg for how to move clubs on to a competitve model cracking CL EL groups etc. However why aren't local industries or investors pumping money into facilities and structures of LOI clubs as they have done in Rosenborg, Zilina, BATE, clubs in Cyprus etc? The usual football blame goes on the GAA, rugby, FAI and so on, however the facts remain that individuals and companies of drive and substance won't because of the unerring ability of the clubs of the LOI to rent each other asunder, sell out and go for short term success at the expense of a longer term sustainable model. So if other posters are right in their repeated assertions, then Sporting Fingal are no different to any other club in trying to grow too big too fast, which is completely relevant to the post you mentioned.
The problem being that Fingal is based on one person trying to drop a successful sports team into a larger construction planning plan (similar as with Drogheda's ground proposal). The problems facing the league - lack of sponsorship, lack of interest and therefore small gates, the Premiership lurking nearby - are different to the ones Fingal face. There are two valid points there, but they're completely unrelated, despite your best attempts to try show otherwise.