Oooh, fight fight fight!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Rory H
Would hate to see seamie leave but if he is wuld hope it's for decent money with the club not gettin shafted on sell on clauses.
Printable View
Oooh, fight fight fight!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Rory H
Would hate to see seamie leave but if he is wuld hope it's for decent money with the club not gettin shafted on sell on clauses.
You're always like this in the off-season:DQuote:
Originally Posted by celticV3
Definitely need a sell-on clause. Look at what the 10% clause in Huntelaar's contract has netted Heerenveen after his sale to Madrid.
i just hope the club seamie went from st catherines had somekind of clause..so that we recieve somekind of money..as he did learn his trade wit us
Mixture of adrenaline and sexual tension, I need to get back to the jinks agains, and soon:)Quote:
Originally Posted by Rory H
Hope seamie gets a break over there. I know he is a great player but many great players have gone across and no made the grade, know seamie will if he gets the chance but hope he gets the chance if this deal was to come about.
i never even suggested you said we needed him! :mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by Rory H
FFS!!!!:mad:
http://www.donegalpost.com/2008/12/0...s-for-coleman/
Former St Catherine’s star Seamie Coleman departed Derry Airport on Sunday morning, flying direct to Birmingham to discuss the terms of a potential transfer.
It is believed that Birmingham City have made a six figure offer to Sligo Rovers and the club have given their prized asset permission to speak to the ‘Brummies’ hierarchy. Any such deal will also involve add on clauses in relation to league appearances and international caps.
Celtic’s offer of a week’s trial struck a chord with the attacking right back, but after deliberation with those closest to him, Coleman finally decided to let his head rule his heart, as competition for places at his boyhood idols may interrupt the momentum of his progress at this particular juncture of his career.
A source close to the player has told the Donegal Post that Coleman received a call late Saturday evening inviting the Sligo Rovers star and his representative over to the midlands to meet both manager Alex McLeish and his players, and to see the facilities on offer at St Andrews.
Coleman will train at the club’s first team on Thursday before attending Birmingham’s home clash with Watford on Saturday. The source also confirmed that a decision on the right back’s future will finally be made in the next two weeks with Celtic and Burnley still monitoring the situation, although Coleman can’t officially move until the first of January
Found this as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by red bellied
http://www.expressandstar.com/2008/1...rumours-dec-4/
Coleman to Birmingham was mentioned in the The Daily Mail aswell today. Think the column is called "The Screamer", it on the right hand side of a page at the very bottom.
http://www.bcfc.com/page/Match/Reser...476666,00.html
seamie=A Trialist? i think that's him on the ground in the bottom picture
"The only goal of the game arrived less than five minutes in when United broke down the left before squaring the ball for their player to slot home from close range."
ross gaynor from cobh might be signing but i think cork are interested too
How the hell are cork allowed to sign anyone when they havent paid the players they have already.Quote:
Originally Posted by Red4Eva
What?Quote:
Originally Posted by srfc1928
If the players we have arent paid what theyre owed in backpay by 31st of January we wont get a premier license. However this has no affect on signing players now...
I am aware of that, but IMO it should.Quote:
Originally Posted by micls
In that case just do what Cork always do and change the club name again.Quote:
Originally Posted by micls
Till the next time.....
Based on what exactly?Quote:
Originally Posted by srfc1928
Im be pretty sure you owe someone money for something, should that stop you signing players? All clubs have creditors.
Yeah thats exactly what we did when we went into examinership :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by dong2008
That post doesnt even make sense ffs, we'd just be in the first division.
Original attempt at a wind up though .....
I dont think its fair to your players or creditors as you like to call them:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by micls
to go with out pay and then go out and sign more creditors.:D
Remember MICLS....you cant use the name alberts, celtic, hibs etc next time!
:rolleyes: Do you understand what examinership is?Quote:
Originally Posted by srfc1928
Of course its not fair, but it was that or go bust. Our players will get all their money and the same players have agreed wage cuts SO that we could sign more players and be competitive next year, players that had no obligation to do so.
So maybe you should see what they think before getting all offended on their behalf
Why not, we've used City twiceQuote:
Originally Posted by red_away
From hereQuote:
Originally Posted by Birmingham newspaper