The value is correct as Jicked also alluded to.
I'm talking about the interpretation of that value.
Printable View
The value is correct as Jicked also alluded to.
I'm talking about the interpretation of that value.
The exchange was -
Quote:
Originally Posted by macy
Which seems fairly straightforwardedly silly to me. Now fair enough if it was just phrased badly, and absolutely there's different ways of interpreting the figures depending on what caused the losses.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jicked
It was just phrased badly, my mistake. I was trying to suggest that the figure mentioned at the start of the thread isn't the full picture.
Fairy nuff so.
Just though id let everyone know that the rovers forum is back open :)