A passport is internationally accepted proof of stated nationality - not evidence of entitlement to nationality. There is a big difference.Quote:
Originally Posted by Krstic
You can be British without holding a British passport. However - you will not be able to prove you are British (e.g. to customs, foreign organisations, internal financiers etc) without one.
Likewise, you can still be de facto an Irish citizen even if you hold a British passport without holding an Irish one (I have friends who do so). Such is the benefit of dual-citizenship (although for legal purposes, it would be difficult in those circumstances to prove you are anything other than British).
At international football games, all players have to prove their credentials to the officials present before they are allowed to play. Hence why passports - as the only internationally accepted proof of nationality - are required.
This is a terrible decision by FIFA, and risks polarising the NI playing squad. I note that the reason they gave is that "The fact that a player holds an Irish Republic passport does not demonstrate conclusively that he or she is eligible to play for Northern Ireland."
I guess this is the key - someone with a Republic passport, no family connection to Northern Ireland, and no entitlement to British citizenship could arguably use an Irish passport to represent the north. There does therefore appear to be a loop-hole there, but surely there's a better way of closing it ??