It would, yeah. Wonder if he could bulk up any? Don't think he's that much smaller than Gary Dicker was with us, and Gary's doing grand in England.
Printable View
It would, yeah. Wonder if he could bulk up any? Don't think he's that much smaller than Gary Dicker was with us, and Gary's doing grand in England.
Well ill just wait to see it on mns before ill take your word for it. Iv seen your post on our crowd so im guessing your judgement may not have been the best last night ;)
Finn is pure class. Him and williams will be the two players we will find it hardest to hold onto for next season. I think they may get moves across the water.
McAllister is pure class. Watched him at Shels and the guy was nearly always there best player. Good Rush man, sure why wouldnt he be.
As for the game, it was great game alright. Its even harder to be on the losing side when its as good a game as that.
All the best anyway, Hope ya push the Rovers all the way and we can nick 3rd
Pats goals now up if you want to relive the moments lamper
http://www.stpatsfc.com/main.php
That McAllister goal;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVObVoRAB9U
They're in reverse order on the website (e newest vid first) so that'd be our first goal (Vinny faherty's)
They where all offside.:D
On a side note, I dont think mahon was watching the same game I was, the better side in the second half? Dont think so. Biased views methinks. For the first 10 or so minutes, maybe. And as for the first half, well its hard to break down a team who just come to defend and pack out the midfield. I love the way he mentions how people are saying we are a good footballing side and he calls that a load of old guff or something to that effect, when earlier in the season he was talking about how fingal where a good footballing side:confused: Anyway I think the statement was more out of frustration at others claiming Pats dont play good football, but it would be appreciated if he would leave us out of it.
Clearly the better side in the 2nd half lamper. We "won" that half 3-1 btw.
Cant agree. Obviously goals win games (dont forget we did have what looked to be a good goal disallowed to make it 2-0) and I dont begrudge you the win (not much anyway).
There is more needed than just playing nice football, i know this, but there is no way you will convince me Pats where the better team in a footballing sense, as in more posession, more chances, better passing, which is what mahon is trying to make out in order to try and get across his idea that Pats played the better football and do play good football.
If its down to being more clinical in front of goal then fine but outplaying us in a footballing sense, nah I aint buying it.
Who said anything about outplaying in a footballing sense?
I think thats what he was indicating in fairness, and he has a point.
Don't see how lamper can say Pats packed the midfield when we played the same amount of players there as yourself? We did have more chances, we had similar levels of possession and I felt we dictated the pace for the majority of the second half. There were plenty of hurried long clearances from Fingal defenders too.
Its not like mahon criticised Fingal either. He just said we were the better side in the second half. Something borne out by the win IMO