Funnily enough I was talking to someone earlier about the Arteta thing and he mentioned to me that Hargreaves doesn't actually qualify as home grown under the new premier league rules. Funny stuff.
Printable View
Funnily enough I was talking to someone earlier about the Arteta thing and he mentioned to me that Hargreaves doesn't actually qualify as home grown under the new premier league rules. Funny stuff.
http://link.brightcove.com/services/...d=592799131001
I wonder what Matt Holland and Andy Townsend think of Roy's sentiments?
(I would like to have heard a bit more of the Owen Coyle interview - from the clip it sounds as if he was an opportunist who decided to play for us - actually come to think of it .. Steve Bruce qualified to play for us too .. Irish interest in all three managers interviewed)
test test
I guess it just strikes me as funny that some English seem appalled that Arteta could play for England when he's been living there for five years, has an English wife, etc...whereas Hargreaves has only been there three years or so. Sure there's more to nationality than time spent in a country, I just find it interesting that Hargreaves was never difficult for them to swallow, but Arteta is.
Goes back to the search for pure blood I guess, haha.
having moved to Canada, it was one of the first things that struck me as really odd. I have no idea why. Perhaps it is because nationality is, by its nature, more easily defined in Ireland and therefore more important to an Irish person that being "Canadian" is to a Canuck. Even direct immigrants who have been here for as little as 5 years (some Croats and Macedonians) say they are canadian now as Canada has welcomed them and given them so much opportunity. Even though i understand where theyre coming from, I still cant wrap my head around that...
You associate with Macs?
i try to avoid it but sometimes i cant!
Lads im ot one for stirring poo but How the heck is Mc Court not able to get into the North's squad when a schoolkid (gorman) can make it, not to mention Corey Evans.
Northern Ireland squad: Taylor (Birmingham), Tuffey (Inverness Caledonian Thistle), Blayney (Linfield), J Evans (Man Utd), Craigan (Motherwell), Cathcart (Blackpool), McAuley (Ipswich), Hughes (Fulham), Baird (Fulham), McCann (Peterborough), Brunt (West Brom), Gorman (Wolves), C Evans (Man Utd), Davis (Rangers), Clingan (Coventry), Healy (Sunderland), Feeney (Oldham), Lafferty (Rangers), Paterson (Burnley), Patterson (Plymouth).
It probably has something to do with how the concept is viewed in what you might call the "New World" (Canada and the US). With those societies being founded and built as one upon or within a melting pot of all sorts of ethnicities, their perspective on nationality is very much civic in outlook - everyone is more than welcome welcome to consider themselves Canadian or American if they've contributed in some way - whereas I think many in Europe, where there might be less homogenisation of cultures and ethnicities within certain states or societies, relatively-speaking, still view nationality on somewhat ethnic lines. For example, for some, the idea of being Irish and being a Catholic Gael or whatever are one and the same and anything other than that is viewed as being somehow "less Irish" or "not authentic Irish". I think that way of looking at nationality is adapting to the modern world, however, which is why you get groups like the BNP in Britain protesting about the erosion of the "indigenous Briton's way of life".
Didn't he injure himself again whilst celebrating his last wonder goal? Or maybe he's returned to action since, I don't know. 'Tis a strange one alright if he's fit seeing as it was only a fortnight ago, I think, Worthington was assuring McCourt that the international door was still open for him. Why he might have thought it had been shut on him, I'm not sure either.
He came on on Saturday so he is not injured.... I just thing its a bit strange. Gorman has never played 1st football.
Not that I'm disagreeing with you that he's probably deserving of a call-up for them, but here's Worthington's take on it: http://breakingnews.ie/sport/mccourt...#ixzz0xYYPNMVm
McCourt getting regular first-team football seems to be Worthington's priority. Worthington ignored McCourt whilst he was at Derry for some reason and gave the excuse that he was not playing at a high-enough standard. This was despite the fact he was calling Irish League players into his squads at the same time, if memory serves me correctly. Not suggesting there's some grudge there, but it did seem a bit odd at the time considering McCourt's performances and blatant ability then, as does leaving him out now for a vital Euro qualifier in favour of including inexperienced schoolboys and the like.Quote:
Worthington said that McCourt simply has to keep fit and keep playing and he will be in contention for the upcoming Euro 2012 qualifier away to Slovenia next month.
“The door is still open for Paddy,” he said.
“He was injured a lot over the last year with different bumps and things and that got in the way.
“We all know the quality he possesses but I’ve told Paddy that he has to work hard when he plays, as do all the players in the team, and he knows that.
“But if he gets a regular spot at Celtic then he will be in my plans.
“I brought the youngsters in to give them some experience, to give them a chance but the door is still open for everyone.
“At the moment it’s too early to talk about my squad for the Slovenia game but I will be looking at the situation over the coming weeks.”
Perhaps he just assumes, wrongly, that McCourt is looking to jump ship.
More's the pity that he didn't do so years ago, but good luck to him.
Know what you mean, but surely if you support Ireland, you're then contradicting your own point?
The thing is smaller countries often have mass emigration, especially of professional sports people to better themselves on a bigger stage, so they can't afford to lose them to whatever national league(s) they assimilate into.
We've already seen this farce in NZ & Oz rugby and English cricket where teams go round hoovering up all eligible talent, with limited recourse or of dual use of players, eg. Ed Joyce and just serves to concentrate the resources of many into the hands of the few.
That said the individual should have some sort of choice but would feel FIFA's current restrictions (for all their other many faults) are probably the best compromise.
Anyway with the case of Ingerland it's nothing new, eg. John Barnes or Owen Hargreaves.
The real oddity in this squad is Gorman's inclusion rather than McCourt's shunning. That said, big Nige has also regularly used McGinn, Little (another Old Firm reserve), as well as the ManU youth players and semi-retired Healy. And LoI keeper Mannus, of course.
Worthington has little support left now, after a run of defeats and bizarre selections. Most of our fans expect a sound beating in Maribor and are hoping he'll walk after that.
PS interesting points on the Arteta row above, esp by Messrs Nedser and Irish Fan 86.
No.
WC 2010 qualifying:
Czechia A- 0:0
Poland A- 1:1
San Marino A 3:0
EC 2008 qualifying
Sweden A- 1:1
Liechtenstein A 4:1
Denmark A 0:0
IIRC, didn't you guarantee on a previous thread that NI wouldn't win? I think we will, 1-0 would do. But if I'm wrong, it would be the most embarrassing result since Iceland in 2006.Quote:
I've a feeling the Faroe Islands are due an "upset". I imagine Nigel will walk after that game
2010.
Albania 1 - 0 Northern Ireland
Montenegro 2 - 0 Northern Ireland
Summer Tour
Turkey 2 - 0 Northern Ireland
Chile 1 - 0 Northern Ireland
Yeah I think I did write that. Obviously I can't guarantee something that falls outside my control but I've seen enough of the Faroes under Brian Kerr to know that a team that can't score goals will struggle against them. I'm certainly glad we didn't get drawn against them. But anyways I'm sure I told you that Montenegro were a stronger team than NI, which you dismissed. Don't think NI had a shot on goals against them in the recent friendly.
You do know what 'invariably' means, I hope? We're poor away from home, but when it matters we beat minnows and often draw with stronger teams.
Maybe you should watch more closely. The Faroes almost always lose, so even a weak NI will be favorite to scrape home.Quote:
Yeah I think I did write that. Obviously I can't guarantee something that falls outside my control but I've seen enough of the Faroes under Brian Kerr to know that a team that can't score goals will struggle against them
WC qualifying:
NI 4-3-3-13-9-15
FO 1-1-8-5-20-4
Fine, I think we can agree they're stronger than Andorra or San Marino.Quote:
I'm certainly glad we didn't get drawn against them
Based on comparable record I was right. We got 15 points, they only managed nine.Quote:
But anyways I'm sure I told you that Montenegro were a stronger team than NI, which you dismissed
We had four or five on target. Stop posting nonsense.Quote:
Don't think NI had a shot on goals against them in the recent friendly
Of course not. :bigsmile:
The only competitive away wins in the last 10 or so odd years have been against San Marino, Malta and Liechtenstein. Away defeats were recorded against the minnows of Iceland and Latvia during NI's arguably most successful qualification campaign in recent decades. Away draws against stronger nations have mostly come towards the end of qualification campaigns when the opposition are going through the motions of fulfilling a fixture. The away draw against Denmark was played early in a qualification campaign but if I recall that was a "backs to the wall" performance from NI but agree that it was a fanastic result for NI and a disappointing result for the Danes (and a qualification campaign on the whole that the Danes want to forget).
NI will be favourities of course. But l'm confident that the Faroes will give a good account of themselves against NI. Both France and Serbia had to dig deep for their away wins against them and the Faroes did, in their most recent competitive home game, record a win against Lithuania, who are ranked higher than NI in the FIFA ranking table.
But you weren't playing the same opposition. When NI finally got to play Montenegro, NI were soundly beaten.
The words "rarely troubled" describe Montenegro's goalie's performance against NI.
Not true for the Poland game last time, nor that against Sweden in Euro 2008 (your neighbors only qualified in the last game of 12). And while the Czechs were below par when we played them, qualifiers are never completely irrelevant. I mean, there are seeding points to be earned.
Indeed, We certainly won't under-estimate them and would be quite pleased with a narrow win.Quote:
NI will be favourities of course. But l'm confident that the Faroes will give a good account of themselves...Faroes did record a home win against Lithuania, who are ranked higher than NI in the FIFA ranking table
We were playing in a group of roughly equal standard, including a team that finished 12 points ahead of you in previous qualifying. Clearly we were better in qualifying, they beat us comfortably in a one-off friendly. Unless, according to your warped logic, Montenegro's two draws make them as good as the RoI despite finishing nine points behind.Quote:
But you weren't playing the same opposition. When NI finally got to play Montenegro, NI were soundly beaten
Didn't see it, did you? Their keeper made three excellent saves.Quote:
The words "rarely troubled" describe Montenegro's goalie's performance against NI
Hargreaves doesn't qualify as homegrown for the new 25-man squad requirement - there's no question he doesn't qualfiy for the national team.
I think John Barnes would be a better comparison to Arteta. England fans never had a problem accepting him, presumably because he came from an English-speaking country and picked up an English accent very quickly. Most people are probably not aware that he didn't set foot in England until he was 16.
All this is fascinating, but the North are even more mediocre than Ireland away from home.
It's nothing to do with seeding points in either case, but invariably grabbing a goal and/or holding out against their goal(s) being under siege and hanging on for dear life. Yet another reason why a UI team could hardly do any worse....
One last point, Montenegro, a new country and FIFA member, will prove themselves to be better than the North in the longer term. And the basis of their two draws last time round., maybe the proper Ireland team also.
When NI played Sweden away, Sweden only needed 3 points from their last 3 games to qualify. I know they expected to confirm qualification the night they played NI at home and duly went through the motions in the expectation that they would win with the minimum of effort. NI punished them accordingly but really should have won given Sweden's disinterest. Poland and the Czechs were pretty much out of the reckoning when they played NI.
What seeding did Montenegro have? They didn't enter the qualification process on a similar footing to NI. The game and result between the two sides speaks for itself.
Ireland A were playing.
It wasn't my description of their goalie's performance.
Owen's decision to declare for us has already been documented here.
There were 2 letters of invitations on his kitchen table at the same time, one from Scotland and one from Ireland, to join up with the relevant u21 squads. For him it was a no brainer and he chose Ireland, his first u21 game was lining out against Scotland.
Aye, as IFK said we invariably lose except when we don't. Good value for those draws, although admittedly against Denmark the home side may have been distracted by the giant blow-up doll behind our goal.
Zzz. You've already got a united Ireland plus English and Scottish guest players, yet you think it's likely to fall behind Montenegro in future? Stop posting nonsense.Quote:
Yet another reason why a UI team could hardly do any worse....
If you're going to judge them on WC qualifying, they won one game. Let's see how they get on this time.Quote:
One last point, Montenegro, a new country and FIFA member, will prove themselves to be better than the North in the longer term
Ha ha. Another game you didn't watch, clearly. The draw was a fair result. In any case, with NI widely regarded as out of the reckoning after losing to Iceland and Latvia, the Svens should have won given our disinterest.
The Poles weren't- they still had four of their eight significant games left. Excluding San Marino, with due respect to their slight improvement in Euro 08.Quote:
Poland and the Czechs were pretty much out of the reckoning when they played NI
Spare us the rhetorical flourishes. Everyone enters qualification on the same basis; everyone played eight or 10 games; Montenegro managed one win against similarly mediocre opposition to that in the other groups. The game between us and them was a one-off friendly which speaks for very little compared to a whole qulifying series. Your suggestion that the RoI-Montenegro group was somehow more difficult than the others is a bit silly. They, Georgia and Cyprus won three games out of 30 between them. Hardly World-beaters. As for the rest, it's luck of the draw.Quote:
What seeding did Montenegro have? They didn't enter the qualification process on a similar footing to NI. The game and result between the two sides speaks for itself
Get some new material. With you as Goteborg's top comedian it's little wonder the suicide rate's so high.Quote:
Ireland A were playing
We know that. It was still wrong.Quote:
It wasn't my description of their goalie's performance
Whether the draw was a fair result or not is irrelevant to the point I'm making which was Sweden underperformed on the night. Given my location, you can assume that I have seen Sweden play on countless more occasions than you so you can also assume that I'm the better judge of whether they underperformed or not. Regardless the main factual piece of information that's not subjective is that Sweden only needed 3 points from their remaining 3 games and the Swedish FA had made preparations for a "qualification party" on the night of the NI game.
Hence the use of the phrase "pretty much out of the reckoning".
Groups are seeded. Montenegro were 6th seeds at the time. NI were 4th seeds (if I recall correctly). Again Montenegro played NI recently and recorded a comfortable win.
In your opinion. Others have a different opinion. Can we agree on the result? Montenegro 2 - 0?
Er, why would I assume any of that? You're just another anonymous poster on the internet, variously pontificating about games you haven't seen, quoting supposed facts that you've made up and indulging in childish wind-ups. I couldn't care less if you've seen every Swedish international since the break-up of Abba, presumably in some parallel universe while simultaneously watching the Republic of Ireland's games on the same dates. I've only seen a handful, including the two against NI, but I also managed brief youtube highlights of most of the other games in Euro 2008. More than enough to assess all the teams in the group.
More fool them.Quote:
Regardless the main factual piece of information that's not subjective is that Sweden only needed 3 points from their remaining 3 games and the Swedish FA had made preparations for a "qualification party" on the night of the NI game
If you equate "pretty much out of the reckoning" with "not out of the reckoning at all", you must realise that other readers will be confused?Quote:
Hence the use of the phrase "pretty much out of the reckoning"
You don't, we were seeded third. Are you the Belfast Telegraph's Goteborg correspondent?Quote:
NI were 4th seeds (if I recall correctly)
Aye, and Queen Anne's dead. As I said, according to your warped logic one game- even if a friendly- trumps a series of 10 qualifiers- on which basis presumably Montenegro are as good as the RoI despite finishing miles behind? Bizarre.Quote:
Again Montenegro played NI recently and recorded a comfortable win
Indeed, although I'd be wary of opinions not based on watching the game.Quote:
In your opinion. Others have a different opinion
You're the one making up stats, dear. Have a ryvita and stop posting rank-pulling nonsense.Quote:
Can we agree on the result?
Ignore him people, if anyone's a Troll it's someone who says they're British &, er, 'Irish' trying to be a WUM.
But ending up generally looking pretty retarded, simply because they have nothing better to do with their time....
Proof enough from his ill-considered response to Post #1628 in #1632 where he fails to answer the points made!
Afternoon, troll. You can stop trolling and all.