Try the Celtic Cup thread.
Printable View
I heard that today that the fai will announce just before the wales match in a couple of weeks time that ireland will play england in early 2012.
then you and the rest of the history teachers should head off to a history of Ireland messageboard.
Why?
To confirm lots of its current citizens live in bubble, where no-one mentions how a state under 100 yrs.old came to be founded....
Our ancestors would be so proud.
Then I would lose out on the joyous wit, the social interaction only a pc screen can offer as well as the ramblings of the community.
wasn't it Oscar Wilde that said
By giving us the opinions of the uneducated, journalism keeps us in touch with the ignorance of the community.
I'm sure the historians here can confirm or negate that.
I'm off to watch a game
Huh??
People relating history are now uneducated?? Mr.Wilde would be flattered by your analogy.
I think you need to read my post again. At no point did I say that people relating history were uneducated.
Then again "A lie told often enough becomes the truth" - (Vladimir I Lenin)
I am moving on now as this thread is about a possible Ireland England friendly Association Football match
Our ancestors are dead.
Why come to a football website to argue history with a bunch of people that dont want to hear it (our resident nordies) and a whole bunch of people who already know it and/or dont care and/or just want to talk football. Its just tiresome that every topic that is even semi-related to Ireland/Northern Ireland/England/UK gets sidetracked by this nonsense.
So history and the struggles of our ancestors is now unimportant in every respect? It happens in lots of other places too Btw.
;)
Surely it's more tiresome that people continually enter a bubble of denial on these issues. It's only banter after all.
The wider cultural context of many sporting fixtures is a factor in lots of instances. Get over yerself.
no, its not unimportant but it has its place and a football forum isnt that place in my humble opinion.
Ok, but let's hope you'd say the same to Scotland fans with their 'Bannockburn 1314' flags?? ;)
And the Ingerlish when they start up their "No Surrender" chant.
So yes, No place at all.
great ...consensus reached ..now move on
England coming to town Feb 29th 2012?
According to reports on the radio
Super. 4days after we play Italy at Lansdowne in the Six Nations.
I think it's only inevitable that such contexts envelope the discussion in this forum at times given, whether one likes it or not, the undeniable politico-cultural nature of international football. You have to ask yourself, would we be bothering to play England at all in a football friendly in this period of national craving for a sense of "maturity" if it were not for that "dirty" word; h*story? It would be naïve to see this as a football match solely for football's sake. The game doesn't exist in a bubble.
Crikey DI, you only said that a hundred times more eloquently than I did.
Fair play. If you're not a lawyer or journo', you should be....
only thing is our side will be the only ones putting some pseudo-political, pseudo-historical context to it while simultaneously financially and emotionally supporting British football teams. Its all a bit immature really when you think about it. And im sure I and most others except for you, ArdeeBhoy and a couple of others didnt log on to foot.ie to be given a history lesson on the foundation of the state, history almost all of us are only too aware of already.
"Hedley Lamar: My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Taggart: God darnit, Mr. Lamarr, you use your tongue prettier than a twenty dollar wh*re."
Levity aside, DI, that's very well put, although I'd maintain that history itself isn't a dirty word. The problem is more the nuances that are put on it to mould a version of the past that dovetails neatly with a vision of the future. History, or more accurately, historiography is damnably contestable on this island (and if I'm honest, I'll admit to being a post-revisionist). It will always be just a game of football to some, and more than a game of football to others. And never the twain shall meet - here or elsewhere.
Sorry, I'm too lazy to look this up: SO will this be the last friendly before WC Q Starts? Or will it have started already?
Again apologies. Was up at 4 AM waiting to see if the Queen wore an Apricot hat so I could collect my winnings. Damn.
dont mind, i was just being pseudo-intellectual... :D
PseudoStu
PseudoStu talks lots of poo.
I'm thinking of starting a Suede tribute band called Psuede
Thanks. Im a moron. For some reason I thought it took place after the Euros. So they are basically scheduling these games hoping they make Euros... And if they dont they are just kind of meaningless cold weather games many players would pull out of I would imagine...
I'm not sure if all of those assumptions are directed at myself personally, although I was simply observing or describing what I view to be a reality, if you will. Indeed, maybe it is a bit immature of those you mention - I don't offer financial or emotional support to British clubs, for what it's worth - but then you could say that of any "petty rivalry" or even the whole idea of masses of grown men (and women, of course) channelling their hopes and dreams through groups of eleven other incomparably more talented men kicking a ball around field. It's not that difficult to discredit or degrade something of which you have little interest. Each to their own and all that.
As Eminence Grise points out, there will be those who see this game as a chance to "get one over the old enemy" - it wasn't by chance that the popular 'Joxer Goes to Stuttgart' happened to be written about a game against England - and there'll be those who'll see it as an opportunity to reach out in the seductive and prevailing spirit of forgiveness and political maturity so we can give ourselves a good pat on the back for being so progressive and forward-looking as a nation when we stand to observe 'God Save the Queen' with only the most impeccable of respect, or whatever it is cosmopolitan nations apparently do these days. There'll be others who'll have it marked down as just another football game; the same as any other.
I don't log on to receive or give history lessons. I sense that's a subtle reference to my posting habits. When I post at length on the eligibility issue, for example, as I admittedly do quite a bit - although it's not all I do here - my primary aim is not to engage in political discussion, but, rather, to give my take on matters from personal experience of the reality of the situation in the north and how the rules impact upon it or how it impacts upon the rules. I have a personal interest in the issue for obvious reasons. The discussion often takes on a political guise as the issue just happens to be a sensitive and inherently political one. It doesn't mean it ought not be discussed or the past be ignored just because some people have become tired of hearing about it or oversensitive to the mention of anything of a political nature seeing as we're all supposed to be looking exclusively to the future now or whatever. You have to recognise that FIFA's rules have political and social implications too; not merely footballing ones.
nah, they werent all directed at you personally - just that you liked receiving history lessons from ArdeeBhoy. And the subtle reference you sensed was actually aimed at ArdeeBhoy who posts about very little else. Thats not necessarily a criticism - we're all allowed to comment on anything we like - its just a little one dimensional and gets a bit tedious. If youre in the same boat - i havent noticed - knock yourself out.
This isnt an eligibility thread so your last paragraph is largely irrelevant. I have learnt to stay away from those threads.
This is a thread about a possible friendly against England. Should be a cracker - they always are - i was at the last one in 95 and enjoyed it and the aftermath immensely. That said, im aware of the history of Ireland and the influence of England in that history. 99% of posters here will be aware of it. Do we really need to read it again? Cant we focus on the game, the build up, the players etc etc....
No worries, although you had taken issue with what you considered the side-tracking or politicisation of "every topic that is even semi-related to Ireland/Northern Ireland/England/UK", so forgive me for thinking you might have been referring to me given I take an interest in the eligibility issue. ;)
Now, where's AB? We're supposed to be covering the Battle of Widow McCormack's Cabbage Patch this lesson.
Glad to hear the latter. And you'll be glad to know my posts have been on a much wider range of topics than you imply. Whilst DI has as ever identified a certain, er, 'inconsistency' above.
;)
My interjections have been merely to point out, that probably for the duration of our lifetimes, such a fixture will not just be 'another game', which some people seem to think it will be.
If you think I'm overstating this, please see the above reference to Scotland and be grateful you're not part of the Tartan Army!!
Don't you mean Retartan Army?
No need to play England in a friendly. It would attract inevitable and unwanted trouble from morons on both sides. English morons, naturally, and a few Irish looking for revenge for '95 etc etc. No need for the grief unless we happen to get drawn in a group with them (it used to happen all the time...them and the North).
I would relish a game with England and really look forward to it but I think it's probably gonna be something that will attract too much negative press post-game and in footballing terms the players wouldn't learn much either
So what's the alternative? Let the yobbos win? That's what happened the last time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fixer82
If properly policed, the game should pass off without incident. If.....
Would rather meet them at the finals. They're entirely beatable.
They did just beat Spain, but they won't have Rooney in the group stages