Do we want an all - Ireland team?

What got me barred was posting after norn iron got beat however it's ok to celebrate when the 'beggars' get beat? You will find that the vast majority of nationalists (just like those on other side of border)dont really want norn iron to get beat, however they respond in kind like me. If you want real debate on that site about how to change things it should be less censored , as it is it is often boring, even some of your posters admitted that i shacked things up a bit , going back about 2-3 years here I think. As it is it seems at moment to be a pro DUP site more than anything else. Celebrating the likes of Jeffery Donaldson who is nothing but a sad wee failed bigot(Sorry thats the last and only time I will mention politics)

Quote:

---

Originally posted by belfastreb
What got me barred was posting after norn iron got beat however it's ok to celebrate when the 'beggars' get beat? You will find that the vast majority of nationalists (just like those on other side of border)dont really want norn iron to get beat, however they respond in kind like me. If you want real debate on that site about how to change things it should be less censored , as it is it is often boring, even some of your posters admitted that i shacked things up a bit , going back about 2-3 years here I think. As it is it seems at moment to be a pro DUP site more than anything else. Celebrating the likes of Jeffery Donaldson who is nothing but a sad wee failed bigot(Sorry thats the last and only time I will mention politics)

---

Belfastreb it is not so much that southerners want to see NI win or lose. The truth is that most southerners do not really care at all.

Most southern "nationalists" do not want a United Ireland and would run a mile from it. that is one of the hundreds of truths you are not supposed to tell about Irish society. Southerners look on NI with a mix of fear and suspicion and actually feel closer to the english.

Do not expect many to openly agree with me on this but at the same time it would pay to realise I am right.

Lopez. My attitude to international football supporting is straightforward, and oft-repeated here. I'm relaxed about anyone supporting whoever they like, regardless of birth/ location. Provided they don't indulge in abuse or bigotry, or frighten the horses etc., again I don't mind if some make that choice for 'political' reasons.

However, unlike Dermot Nesbitt I am less relaxed about that choice being removed from me. Were that a realistic possibility, I think you'd find that even I would be more representative of broad unionist opinion than him ;)

As for OWC, the religion/ science row certainly doesn't suggest the site is intolerant of differing shades of opinion. And you seem a little confused in your attitude to the zoologist John B----. Why, only the other day he was a "worthy opponent"?

Belfast Reb. We already have debate on OWC, and you are welcome to rejoin it. I/We will continue to delete personal abuse and libels (and to ask users to avoid provocative sectarian comments etc.). This is because we think a broad right to free speech is limited by a corresponding entitlement to privacy. That is, not to be routinely called a "mutant" who should "feck off or integrate" [sic, and see below].

I'm interested you think OWC is now pro-DUP. While Donaldson has been credited for his support for both the NI team and a new stadium in his constituency, his new party leader has attracted both criticism and ridicule recently. As have fringe unionist politicians including Norman Boyd and Billy Hutchinson. You might as well say foot.ie supports Fianna Fail giving grudging backing to O'Donoghue's and Ahern's plans for Lansdowne.

Davros. Suggest you return to the thread below for a brief illustration of why you are banned from the OWC site. But, like I said, it doesn't have to be forever. You know, even those bigots in the Alliance Party are prepared to allow argument every so often. Come in and integrate!

http://www.foot.ie/t11667.htm

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Duncan Gardner
As for OWC, the religion/ science row certainly doesn't suggest the site is intolerant of differing shades of opinion. And you seem a little confused in your attitude to the zoologist John B----. Why, only the other day he was a "worthy opponent"?

---

Oh DG! There was me paying you a compliment and you just couldn't see the wood for the trees. Intolerance is too often associated with religion but it is equally prevalent within atheists - prime example is that wonderful product of the nineteenth century Russian autocracy, the Soviet Union. I've no time for Mormon's and Jehovah's Witnesses knocking on my doors but I think their efforts are far more sincere than double glazing salesmen, and a lengthy spell in the gulag is not the answer to their unsolicited salesmanship or as was the case in free and secular France, for refusing to be conscripted. John B called me a bigot for daring to question a few things (dare say I am) so I'm calling him a bigot for imposing his own 'rational' theory in language that only a moron could not see offends, on the origins of man which is about as baseless as the book of Genesis, but sounds a bit more 'logical' for the ignorant masses.

As for OWC, I can take anyone's comments as their own and not a website. What I can't take as evidence of a moderate site are libellous and inflammatory articles within the main body, but I'm beginning to sound like a stuck record, so I will move on. As for ok2boo, well what can be said about a site that aims to bring in the poisonous side of the old firm to Ireland games. Even I have to agree that the photo offered as evidence of Rangers far right links (and there are many if you read the comments from impartial Asian 'gers supporters in last month's 442) is pretty pathetic. The blokes do look like they are waving to mates. Should see me on the front of a train: You'd definitely think I was a fan of fat Frank.

Before you move on, please send me (ie, a moderator) details of abuse, libels and inflammatory content. OWC makes clear the first two are not allowed. Threads are constantly monitored by your friendly Stalinist. Saying nice things about me notwithstanding.

As I mentioned, I asked Da Hamster (sp?) to delete all that stuff in your exchange with JB. He met me halfway and locked it. I just hope neither of your wives ever reads these pages ;)

Davros. The house rules on OWC appear under the site owner's name. He is bound by them just like, me, you, and all other contributors.

If you, or anyone else, wishes to report any breach of them, you already have the invitation to contact me direct. You clearly don't agree with the way I have applied them, but will accept that the number of posts being edited or deleted has recently risen sharply.

As I have made clear there, anyone wishing to accuse another of bigotry, dishonesty or similar needs to provide supporting evidence. Otherwise they will be asked to withdraw, or have it deleted. Essentially it's 'put up or shut up'.

Since you asked, terms such as 'planter' or 'puppet state' are not banned there per se. But, since they will be offensive to a large majority of readers, our judgement is that contributors are expected and where necessary asked directly, not to use them. (The same broadly applies to the equivalents used by OWC regulars, though not me, here on foot.ie). You have used them and worse as I indicated above, and you have tried on at least three separate occasions in the last month to register different aliases on OWC. It seems likely to me that you intend to use them there. But, as I keep saying, you can rejoin if you respect the rules. That they are slightly different and probably at the moment more rigid than those here, does not make them any less valid.

You may treat this post as on behalf of OWC as a whole. No pun nor hononym intended.

If you mean that your documented instances of abuse etc. are a "joke", it's both unfunny and repetitive. Whereas if you mean that you don't believe my assurances above, I refer you to the evidence. Which, as you know and as on foot.ie, you can still read without being registered.

Any reference you make to my past activity couldn't possibly embarrass any more than the damage your ill-considered contributions are doing to this forum.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by davros

Finally if you put 'Our wee bigots'into Google/Yahoo search engines,guess who it comes up with.......I rest my case!T.A.L.!

---

A post of mine on OWC about ok2boo was deleted criticising both old firm clubs. I also asked why there is a Serbian Rangers Supporters Club. Nothing of course to to with the fact that the Orthodox Serbs hate the Catholic Croats. A certain Marty, an administrator on the forum is a VIP according to this link.
www.serbianloyalrsc.com

Mick- do you still have copy of the detail? You can send it to me privately with the assurance I won't pass it on, if you like.

Did you not suggest that your deleted post might be "slanderous" (libelous, actually) and that if so you apologised for it?

As you suggest, Serbs and Croats are broadly though not exclusively identified with the Roman Catholic and Orthodox Churches respectively. This may well be a factor in the formation of a Serbian Rangers SC. Though not the only one, as a moment or two on google suggests. Fancy that, there's a Serbian Celtic SC as well

I know the VIP you mention is flattered as well as irritated by that link. But essentially all it's telling us is 'Northern Ireland football fan supports Rangers'. Hardly a story, is it?

Tell you what son, give up your internet access and we can start debating a more realistic figure- say €50,000? :)

This thread in a nutshell:

Most people (RoI fans): either no (why the hassle?), or acceptable in principle but unlikely in the forseeable future.

NI fans: no (both because of the hassle) and we're anti in principle.

Lopez: although unlikely in the foreseeable future, I'll keep suggesting to tease NI fans.

Davros: all Ulster unionists/ NI fans are hypocritical, paranoid bigots by definition and thus I can post whatever nonsense I like. Did I mention my adoptive father was an Anglican clergyman and that I lived in Ireland until I was eight?

Sorry if I've missed anyone.

Flounces off to swim and thence pub

Libel is defamation of character in print. And there was nothing libelous in my post. I don't have a copy of the deleted post.

It seem's to be alright to accuse ok2boo of being a bigot because he's a Celtic fan but you can't criticise Rangers on the OWC forum. Even a post that criticises both Old Firm clubs gets deleted.

Yes there is a Serbian Celtic supporters club but there's also a Croatian Celtic supporters club if you look up Google. The anti-Fascist elements that follow Celtic are ashamed of these links and this could be a factor in the establishment of a Celtic supporters club in Serbia.

Marty is a Rangers fan and there's nothing wrong with that. But it seem's he's just as guilty of equating support of Rangers with Northern Ireland as ok2boo is of believing that support for Celtic and Republic of Ireland is the same thing.

I criticise Rangers FC on OWC, here, and elsewhere. None of this has ever been deleted. I should have a look at that big yellow thing in the sky, maybe :)

Ok2boo is accused of bigotry because he represents a lobby encouraging abuse of others simply on the basis of the most tenuous assocaition with Rangers FC.

Given the absence of the relevant detail I'm withdrawing. Also, I'm knackered!

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Duncan Gardner
I criticise Rangers FC on OWC, here, and elsewhere. I should have a look at that big yellow thing in the sky :)

---

Yes you might but you can't accuse Rangers of bigotry on OWC. I wouldn't mind but I even named some of the Catholics who played for Rangers before Mo Johnston discrediting the myth that no Catholics played for Rangers before 1989.

Maybe it was because I had to say that Celtic and Rangers are two sides of the same coin. I suppose Rangers supporting Marty couldn't get his head around that.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by lopez

As for ok2boo, well what can be said about a site that aims to bring in the poisonous side of the old firm to Ireland games. Even I have to agree that the photo offered as evidence of Rangers far right links (and there are many if you read the comments from impartial Asian 'gers supporters in last month's 442) is pretty pathetic. The blokes do look like they are waving to mates. Should see me on the front of a train: You'd definitely think I was a fan of fat Frank.

---

Rangers even have a supporters club in mainly Catholic Vienna. Oh, and Vienna also happens to be the capital of the country where Hitler was born.

See the following
www.beeworld.de/members34/viennatrueblues

Click on the Vienna True Blues link. In the first photograph you can clearly see the chap on the extreme left giving a Nazi salute. I'm no apologist for ok2boo and I think the Old Firm rivalry has nothing to with the Irish national side but it does look like those Rangers fans were giving Nazi salutes.

Although they could be waving to mates like you said. viennatrueblues.beep.de/

Mick. I'm sorry, you are simply wrong. Your post was deleted because it was felt, perhaps inaccurately, to be defamatory. (Technical point- if it had been, then that would be a libel, not a slander, as these forums are considered print media).

Not because you criticised Rangers. I and a few others criticise both halves of the Old Firm regularly (look through the index under my user names), and I've hardly been banned eh?

Davros. You use your family/ faith background and childhood residence as a spurious justification for posting repeated abuse here. It's thus perfectly valid for me to mention and criticise this.

This tread has become completely self-referential and so I think the moderators should lock it up?

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Duncan Gardner
Before you move on, please send me (ie, a moderator) details of abuse, libels and inflammatory content. OWC makes clear the first two are not allowed. Threads are constantly monitored by your friendly Stalinist. Saying nice things about me notwithstanding.

---

The article put on the OWC website mentioned on 'It beggars belief' and in the Sunday Life. Particularly about Irish fans being thieves.

As for contributors, this is not the responsibility of OWC but it gives an insight to the wee minds of a minority who post on it. Like Davros, these messages make me laugh rather than offend. Examples are:

Regrading Northern players opting for the Republic: 'Dirty Poaching Beggar scum'...'That is nothing short of a ****ing disgrace, how low will the FAI stoop. What next, approach our young players in the tunnel as they prepare to play for NI?'... 'Anyway the player hasn't yet agreed to become a mercenary, so there's every chance he'll turn them down...'

Regarding the Republic's English born players: 'After they undeservedly reached the quarter-finals in 1990, this is just deserts for them. They can't complain.Next time your Republic of Ireland, glory hunting, plastic paddy reminds you how well they are doing at the world cup, for such a small nation; remind them: Out of a squad of 22, only 11 of them were actually born in Ireland!!'... 'Most of the ROI squad are English and when their football careers are finished will be back to British passports.'

Regarding Republic's fans: 'What makes ROI fans "the best in the world"? Attacking school buses in Strabane? Booing Rangers players? Irrational hatred of England? Shouting "Up the Ra" at the camera?'...'Why didn't he tell the truth? They f**king hate the English! (unless they're playing for the Beggars). Suppose that wouldn't fit in with the loveable harmless Irish image though, would it..'...'Arse, arse, arse. One small nation and a billion wannabe plackoid hangers on, smug as hell. It would make you want to spit.'

Regarding Celtic supporters: 'Good opportunity for burglers then in Glasgow on the 21st!!' REPLY: 'No, they'll all be in Seville......'

Regarding the 1995 England match: 'irish fans singing ooh ahh up the ra may have had something to do with the violence that followed. I'm no fan of the english, but I am sick of hearing about how great and friendly the republics fans are. They are not, they have their own hoolie element, and anyone who supports the ra deserves to have their stadium ripped to shreds'...'to that **** who said I was talking s**t about what really went on at Lansdown Road - an element of the Republics 'fans' sang pro Republican songs before the violence started. I do not have any great love for the English, but I am stating this as fact. So stop ****in defending the pro-IRA scum element.'

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Duncan Gardner
Davros: all Ulster unionists/ NI fans are hypocritical, paranoid bigots by definition and thus I can post whatever nonsense I like. Did I mention my adoptive father was an Anglican clergyman and that I lived in Ireland until I was eight?

---

Was there really any need for mentioning someone was adopted? Pathetic as it gets really.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by MickF
Rangers even have a supporters club in mainly Catholic Vienna. Oh, and Vienna also happens to be the capital of the country where Hitler was born.

Click on the Vienna True Blues link. In the first photograph you can clearly see the chap on the extreme left giving a Nazi salute. I'm no apologist for ok2boo and I think the Old Firm rivalry has nothing to with the Irish national side but it does look like those Rangers fans were giving Nazi salutes.

Although they could be waving to mates like you said.

---

You're having a laugh. The bloke on the left looks more like Winston Churchill giving the V for victory sign and another is waving. There's even a chinaman there. Mind you German Shepherd - very suspect.

There are plenty of far - right links with Rangers but even I have to admit there's no evidence that Army Groupie is intentionally linked to them.

I'm quite happy to withdraw the word 'adopted' from my previous post, Lopez. Actually it has no relevance to the point (which is that Davros uses his own background irrelevantly to justify his repetitive ramblings on here, not a value judgement on that background).

And we can't having anyone matching me as a sanctimonious prig, can we? That really would be pathetic :)

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Duncan Gardner
I'm quite happy to withdraw the word 'adopted' from my previous post, Lopez. Actually it has no relevance to the point (which is that Davros uses his own background irrelevantly to justify his repetitive ramblings on here, not a value judgement on that background).

And we can't having anyone matching me as a sanctimonious prig, can we? That really would be pathetic :)

---

DG. Davros, knowing him personally, is not the least bit backward about his own biological - if I may use that - history. To me, as coming from a family full of people born outside that capitalist institution called marriage (it's about as priceless or worthless as you make it), it is refreshing, especially as we're talking Sisters of Magdalene era here and not council flat on da nortsoide foor a beybeee era. Seeing our own differing views on the subject, I can't fathom you bringing that up. It truly is the resort of someone that seems to have lost the argument. Dav's insistence on bringing up his religion - even though he admits he is an atheist - seems to be threefold. One to prove that his rantings are not disfigured by religious prejudice. Two, that he has some insight into the unionist mind. And three, that it gives him carte blanche to go where papists like me would never go in what is racial abuse.

As for all this 'a sanctimonious prig' business, I think you need to just double read your posts. Despite what you may think, this isn't the Alamo. And please stop going to the moderator to close threads. I had to rush that one out this morning, which you haven't sent in your two cents yet. :mad:

BTW. Saw your mate Howard on TV last night. I don't know who had a bigger nose for lies. Him or Bliar (sic.).

I am content to allow Lopez and Davros the last public word on this. I've sent my reply to them personally.

a tumbleweed blows down the main street as the men mount
their horses and leave town.the sheriff is mighty relieved that calm has decended again on his quiet little town.they were tough hombres,will they ever return,who knows??,but for now its on with the daily grind.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by the 12 th man
a tumbleweed blows down the main street as the men mount
their horses and leave town.the sheriff is mighty relieved that calm has decended again on his quiet little town.they were tough hombres,will they ever return,who knows??,but for now its on with the daily grind.

---

:D :D :D :D