Originally Posted by Peadar
Video evidence should only be admissible if an agreed standard of coverage is available from every single game in a competition. Roy O'Donovan got an additional two game ban because video evidence was used but O'Connor only got a one game ban as no video evidence was available. If the disciplinary procedure isn't clear, concise and fair, it cannot be respected!
By the way, I get the distinct impression that a lot of the neutrals are just plain jealous that they haven't been involved in two of the biggest Cup Finals seen of this Island for many years.