Right so that's 2, and there's nothing to suggest they'd have been quicker coming into the LOI circle with B teams or under 23 teams either.
Printable View
Right so that's 2, and there's nothing to suggest they'd have been quicker coming into the LOI circle with B teams or under 23 teams either.
Theres also most goalkeepers. Mark McNulty turned 34 a couple of weeks ago, this was his 5th season as first choice.
Why would local leagues be bothered by an U21 league? Thought they were all happy enough being big fish within their own pond.
Regards finances, let's say Cork, Limerick, Sligo, Dundalk, Pat's and UCD want an U21 league and rest of the league are ok with that, they still require a cash injection into that league?
On the first part I'll give an example.
A couple of years ago Cork City applied for membership of the Munster Senior League which is really a Cork Senior League since there are no clubs outside of Cork playing in that League.
City wanted to give more experience & playing time to some of their Under 19's who were now too old for that League but not yet ready for the senior squad.
Anyway they were refused admission so they loaned out the some of the promising young players to Senior League Clubs.
Now if City enter an Under 21 League team these loan players will no longer be available to Senior League Clubs.
Plus City may also take some of the more promising Munster Senior League players for their under 21 side.
Normally City mightn't be bothered with these Munster Senior League players over the age of 19 as they would have no team to play them in.
Now there's two reasons why clubs in the Munster Senior League wouldn't like to see an Under 21 League starting.
Further City might also decide to take promising players over the age of 19 from clubs like Tralee & Killarney which these clubs wouldn't be very keen on.
So you see there are several reasons why local leagues might object to the forming of a National Under 19 League.
I'm sorry but I didn't understand the second part of your posting.
Maybe its too early in the morning for me.
Thanks for answering the first part of my question. I don't think the clubs would veto the the league. If the players are coming through the city ranks, it's not like they are being poached at that stage.
"Its no good just forming a league & expect the clubs to bear all the financial burden of entering & running teams."
Is a U21 league not possible without FAI or a commercial sponsor?
This Connolly fella has a lot to say about underage football in the League of Ireland. I quoted him on the matter going back to 2011 before. The above is from around April this year.Quote:
Originally Posted by Connolly frustrated by League of Ireland underage structure
My understanding is that there will be an U17 league from next August and that the FAI have been looking for expressions of interest from clubs outside of the league. It's got to be said in fairness that the U17 league will be a good addition to the league structure and seems a good age group to get involved in the league. The pathway from the U19 setup to first-team is still a glaring gap in the setup. Obviously better placed people than any of us have raised that point.
What's needed is an Under 21 League with a limit of 3 overage players.
Its so glaringly obvious its ridiculous but it must receive the proper support from the FAI.
The League of Ireland clubs need to stand up & be counted on this. Otherwise its like *issing in the wind.
If I come back here next year we will still be talking about the same thing.
Nothing is going to happen because the 60 member council who control the FAI don't want it.
Surely clubs can lobby for change? Make enough noise etc. It's junior club mentality to accept things as they are. I know the FAI are trying to follow some UEFA model but that doesn't mean it's without flaws, especially for that gap between U19 and senior level.
The U17 league should be a positive development.
The FAI's approach has more often than not been based on consensus and compromise, except when it comes to abolishing things. If a mutually beneficial agreement can't be found, they usually just back off and leave alone, hence the complete disconnect between different levels of football.
Is it beyond clubs to bring about an intermediary league between U19's and senior level? You'd imagine there has to be a constructive way of bringing forward the argument? Let's take Dundalk, Cork and Limerick. If the top brass of those clubs got in contact with each other and were in favour of an intermediary league, they should make contact with other clubs and sound them out. Even if only 6 clubs were interested, they could make a case to the FAI for the introduction of a new tier. You'd imagine they'd have to bring forward an argument based on players who've come through the U19's and where they have gone from there?
If 6 clubs played each other 3 times as in the premier, they'd have a 15 game season at least. While not ideal, the level would have to start from some where. No better place than a number of clubs who are committed to the level. With the FAI looking for expressions of interest for the first division and even the underage league, it would open the possibility for some new clubs to join at that level. Clubs were against a 10 team Premier - that got reversed. Some clubs wanted the A Championship scrapped - they got their wish.
It's unlikely there will be change. If some clubs are serious about wanting a structure in place for players out of U19's, they should be more forceful in looking to bringing about change. Anything else is only junior club mentality.
There's nothing to stop the clubs from working together to make things better. Except that they're generally over stretched and short of people to help.