Printable View
is there any party that tells you their policies?? i think that is the point he is trying to make. i dont think their is, not that id trust any of the parties but i dont expect them to set their policies out in stone when they are not in power especially
Hmm, interesting, rather than apologise for insulting a poster, you heap more stupidity onto yourself with another post. Now unless you didn't read my post clearly or are not so sure about politics, parties will not completely outline their policies as it is insane to do so. However one can always question and read deeper into what is presented. I can understand your insecurity on this and the need to use childish remarks and insults, however having worked in politics both in Ireland and abroad, I can safely say that the most carefully laid out plans for parties or individuals will always have to be changed with new circumstances and events. If one has laid out a set in stone policy which then has to be changed, then such a change will be used by critics, opposition or those who are unsure about how politics operate as a stick to beat them with. Likewise in the sporting world, a coach is never going to lay out his exact tactics in advance.Quote:
Originally Posted by dahamsta
Again, your childish remarks really have no place on a proper CA forum, maybe slagging off fans of opposition clubs, but on more serious matter it really is a tad off.
......was I the only one expecting a "404: page not found" error on that link?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dodge
Dodge, having read (I think you previously posted this) some of the policies, especially the "outline" on sport, they're exactly what I'm talking about, outlines, suggestions, that the other parties are also parrotting. However the one thing that (I think) would stand in Labour's favour, is that they'd carry through on more as they would look to make a change. Then again, most of the points they make are done anyway (reviewing the support systems for athletes after 2012, being one). It will be interesting if they do get into government and if they'll push on with their current tactics. Having watched Joan Burton in action last night I hope they do!Quote:
Originally Posted by Dodge
He hee.Quote:
Originally Posted by OneRedArmy
spud - @wasn't me who posted before.
Policies are in there. Some specific. Some not. Sport isn't high on any party's agenda so none of them will publish anything specific.
Obviously I'm left leaning but I think its ludicrous that anybody would think Labour are the only party being vague about some of their intentions. Parties in opposition obviously don't trust Govt figures so it'd be fairly foolish to promise x, y and z without first checking to see how it can be paid for.
spudulika, I have no problem with you having a difference of opinion with me, and I understand that you might be offended that I dislike your attitudes intensely and don't think your opinions are the brightest. But I didn't call you stupid, and that's not an acceptable way of behaving in here. If you call me or anyone else on Foot.ie stupid again, I'll throw you out on your ear. Am I making myself fairly clear? Modify your behaviour or don't post in here again.
I have no further comment on your opinions, I've already stated my position. Twice.
It's all fine and dandy having a go at the Labour policies, but what good are Government "specific" policies when they have to feckin revisit them every few months (again overnight).
We're going to have a new 4 year plan for a Government that, at most possible, has 18 months to run. Give me a lack of specifics over nonsense specifics that can't be followed through on!
You are baffling with the continuing insults and seem to think that smothering them in words makes it any more acceptable in adult discussion. So saying you think someone's ideas are not the brightest is actually offensive, though I do take back saying that you are heaping more stupidity onto yourself (I shouldn't have dropped a level to answer as it doesn't make for proper disucssion) and it certainly doesn't mean I would ever call you stupid, as well as being wrong it is impolite. I understand that you may see your own opinions as being the brightest of the posters, though it's extremely unfair to describe others ideas as not being the brightest and then threatening to throw them off the forum, wouldn't you agree? You're right to look for specifics, though having worked on the dark side for longer than I'd have liked, it's just not good pr for them. So it remains for anyone with a brain to look for answers and use their grey matter!Quote:
Originally Posted by dahamsta
Macy, you're right, the government again have had to go back over their position on Anglo, even though there were flags raised about it way back when. I agree with you on them just getting on with the job instead of "goals" or "aims", though for some reason I can't see them doing anything. More ire was focussed on Biffo being under the weather instead of his absolute nonsense in the interview, he had no answers and it was like the famous (or infamous) Joe Jacob interview.
http://twitter.com/PaulGogartyTD
Gogarty trying to get the soundbite "Gutless Gilmore" off the ground
If anything being attacked by Gogarty is a ringing endorsement. Fruitcake...
Taking this to PM. Calm down man!Quote:
Originally Posted by Spudulika