yeah, he's a **** poor journo with a dredful knowledge of our game.
par for the course with that rag unfortunately (the exception being McDonnell)
Printable View
yeah, he's a **** poor journo with a dredful knowledge of our game.
par for the course with that rag unfortunately (the exception being McDonnell)
Surely City's situation with Mathews is the same as Bohs this time last year with Connor, unless the licencing rules have changed.
Don't remember any question about Bohs licence last year.
Am I right?
I think you're right on that.Quote:
Originally Posted by paudie
Agree on that.
Absolutely, which is the point I was trynna make at the start of this thread: the courts, and not the licensing committee, will decide if that money is owed.Quote:
Originally Posted by paudie
I don't think it's quite the same. Bohs claimed to have reason to dismiss Connor for gross misconduct, and even if that later proved to be utter BS, Cork don't seem to have any reason for sacking Matthews other than plain not wanting to pay him.
I'm sure Tom Coughlan (and his solicitor) will strongly disagree with you that. The point is the courts will decide that, not the LCQuote:
Originally Posted by Mr A
Yeah we do, we didn't win the league ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr A
As much as id love to see harps stay up (purely selfishly for the derby matches), there isnt a leg to stand on as regards cork, only hope is Drogheda.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr A
Are they refuting these scurrilous allegations? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Trainee