Originally Posted by
NeverFeltBetter
I'd be a little wary of presenting Carsley as the guy to helm a "long-term project". Not because it isn't true, because there is some rebuilding work to be done, but whoever is in charge next needs to actually show progress relatively quickly. I don't necessarily mean tournament qualification, though that shouldn't be treated as some impossible dream in the short-term, but increased competitiveness for sure, being in that conversation. We've just finished a long-term project manager and it was a disaster. We can't start off with the next one with a similar situation whereby regression and successive lowpoints are dismissed for far too long as a consequence of the project, unimportant in the face of it.
I would be interested in hearing what it is people would expect from the next manager over the next few cycles. I'd be expecting us to have a credible effort at 2026 qualification, and getting to EURO 2028 (especially since we have additional advantages there).