TCTCBM (The Club That Cannot Be Mentioned)
Printable View
TCTCBM (The Club That Cannot Be Mentioned)
North Cork United
Just say they're linked with Bray.
No-one's linked with Bray. But there's a nice symmetry using them as a codeword
What happens when Bray threaten us? (again)Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nah Nah Nah Nah
Get a solicitor's letter from Pyongyang. With a nuclear warhead.
There once was a team from the Shannon,Quote:
Originally Posted by donnrua
37, FC in their canon.
Then one day dahamsta
Roared “shut up! I’ll lambast ya!
Next fecker who names them I’m bannin’.”
Contender for POTY for me. Do we still do that around here?Quote:
Originally Posted by Eminence Grise
St Pats press release today announcing a signing.
To coincide with Forrester's cryptic tweet last night.....Quote:
Originally Posted by desaintsno.12
its hard to stop the mind wandering that way, as ridiculous as it is, but i'm guessing Toner is a whole lot more realistic.Quote:
Originally Posted by mcgonigle
I hoped for similar when I saw the tweet, instantly thought he'd be a smashing replacement for McEleneyQuote:
Originally Posted by desaintsno.12
St Pats are really looking good with their new signings, what a big change to last season. Will be interesting to see how they gel.
Also interesting to see how Swan gets on at Bohs, could be hit or miss.
A lot of signings but a lot of them are unproven young lads or just not great in general. We have 2 young center halves so we'll need an experienced head in there and still need another backup striker but yeah we're definitely better off than we were at this stage last seasonQuote:
Originally Posted by bennocelt
Pats are looking way better alright could be 2 points at risk for us :)
Personally think Pats will break back into the top four, think they’ve done some execellent business. Think they need another striker though, final piece of the jigsaw imo.
Which of last 2 years top 4 (cork, dalk, Rovers, derry)do you think they will finish ahead of, exactly?
All of them. Rovers, Cork and Dundalk won't be able to keep up with only the fourth biggest budgets in the league.Quote:
Originally Posted by placid casual
Dundalk and the stabs back sniffing around Aaron Greene i hear.... :secret:
LOI Transfers poll suggesting that Bradser is more than twice as likely than Bucko to be sacked first - maybe that gives some clues to the possible answers to your question?Quote:
Originally Posted by placid casual
https://twitter.com/LoiTransfers/sta...12559989174273Quote:
After the release of The Fixture List, who will be sacked First?
45%Stephen Bradley
21%Neil McDonald
21%Liam Buckley
13%Gerard Lyttle
12:12 PM - 19 Dec 2017
hahaha
Those eejits were pranked by a rovers staffer into doing an exclusive sneak preview of the new rovers kit (a mock up) they haven't got over beikng made to look like mugs.....bradser is safe as houses.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ezeikial
Stephen Kenny would be a good bet if the yanks take over .....they are unlikely to be sentimental about past success if the man with the biggest budget doesn't deliver. The loi version of Claudio raneiri
That's a relief to me!Quote:
Originally Posted by sbgawa
We are both happy so.
I didn't realise people on twitter decided who got sacked and who stayed on in the LoI.
Guess you learn something new every day.
Good to hearQuote:
Originally Posted by sbgawa
LOI transfer page is basically LOI Banter facebook page although different heads could be running both either and maybe both.
Pools on them are more likely ran by lads exploring more than loi!
Derry, they’ve lost a few players. Don’t think they’ve replaced them with the same quality. Can’t write them off under Shiels thou, he’s done a amazing job there.Quote:
Originally Posted by placid casual
That is sensational news - where did you learn that?Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
If Bradley had Rovers flirting with relegation, like Bucko did, I'd say he would be sacked. That's the difference in the teams I guess.
Apparently pats have never been relegated. Who knew!
From your own post, would you believe, where you conclude that this poll "suggests" he'll be the first sacked.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ezeikial
It suggests nothing. It's a poll on Twitter.
(Well, maybe it suggests that you're still keeping way too close an eye on things Tallaght)
That's a different spin on what you said previously.Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
Twitter polls or any other type of poll decides nothing regarding managerial sackings, but it is snapshot of the opinions of the people who responded to the question asked.
And if he managed to win the trophies Bucko has at Pats with Rovers he'd get a contract for life it seems.Quote:
Originally Posted by placid casual
So you agree it in no way suggests Bradley is first in line for the chop, as you posted?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ezeikial
If you go back and read the original post, it should be clear what I said - you seem to specialise in trying to misrepresent what others have said.Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
Team most likely to win the league / Player most likely to be top scorer / Manager most likely to be first sacked etc is all a matter of opinion. The twitter poll mentioned shows a snapshot of the opinions of the people who responded to the question asked.
Your original post was -
But in no possible way can an internet poll suggest that Bradley is more or less likely than anyone else to be first manager sacked next year.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ezeikial
So not really sure where the misrepresentation is.
I just wanted to call you up on more tedious Rovers-baiting. I'm sure I'm not the only one here bored with it at this stage.
At last some belated honesty on your motivation for this series of posts - why not express that in the first place instead of your tedious nonsense?Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
There is a simple solution for your boredom - use the ignore option as you have done to avoid other posters!
Stu has that option at least. You might have mercy on the poor mods who don't.
Pineapple Stu - biased in favour of MY club.
I'd love to see his ratio of rovers related posts to non rovers related posts, at a guess it seems it would be around 9:1Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu