Just checked it again on the Star:
Saturday May 10:
St.Patricks v Pike Rovers, Patrickswell 6.45
Sunday May 11:
Park v St.Patricks, Shannon 10.30
Maybe thats their punishment for having such a poor pitch. ;) :D
Printable View
Just checked it again on the Star:
Saturday May 10:
St.Patricks v Pike Rovers, Patrickswell 6.45
Sunday May 11:
Park v St.Patricks, Shannon 10.30
Maybe thats their punishment for having such a poor pitch. ;) :D
:D Funny GuyQuote:
Originally Posted by larrywhite
Croom...Pl 19 / Pts 46 (Max 55).......PROMOTED AS CHAMPIONS
Fairview...Pl 21 / Pts 37 (Max 40)
Park.....Pl 19 / Pts 35 (Max 44)
Prospect...Pl 19 / Pts 34 (Max 43)
Coonagh...Pl 19 / Pts 31 (Max 40)
Shels.......Pl 21 / Pts 31 (Max 34)
Knockainey...Pl 19 / Pts 25 (Max 34)
Murroe.....Pl 18 / Pts 21 (Max 33)
Pike B.......Pl 20 / Pts 18 (Max 24)
Holycross...Pl 17 / Pts 15 (Max 30)
St.Pats....Pl 18 / Pts 15 (Max 27)
Abbey.......Pl 18 / Pts 11 (Max 23)
Results
Sunday 04th May (10.30)
St.Pats 1-2 Murroe
Abbey OFF Knockainey
Shelbourne 6-4 Pike
Croom 1-2 Park
Fixtures
Tuesday 06th May (18.45)
Holycross v St.Pats
Murroe v Croom
Abbey v Coonagh
Park v Prospect
Saturday 10/05/08 (18.45)
Holycross v Abbey
St.Pats v Pike
Knockainey v Shels
Sunday 11/05/08 (10.30)
Croom v Coonagh
Park v St.Pats (St.Pats also down to play Pike eveing before??? TBC)
Tuesday 13/05/08 (18.45)
Fairview v Holycross
Coonagh v St.Pats
Pike v Abbey
Thursday 16/05/08 (18.45)
Croom v Prospect
Kncokainey v Murroe
Remaining games: HOME GAMES IN CAPS (BOLD means fixture list completed)
(3) Croom : COONAGH, PROSPECT, murroe,
(1) Fairview : HOLYCROSS
(3) Prospect : park, croom, holycross
(3) Park : PROSPECT, ST.PATS, murroe
(3) Coonagh : ST.PATS, abbey, croom,
(1) Shels : knockainey
(3) Knockainey : MURROE, SHELS, abbey,
(5) Holycross : ST.PATS, PROSPECT, ABBEY, fairview, murroe
(4) Murroe : CROOM, PARK, HOLYCROSS, knockainey
(4) St Pats : PIKE, holycross, coonagh, park,
(2) Pike : ABBEY, st.pats
(4) Abbey : COONAGH, KNOCKAINEY, pike, holycross
Park 0 Prospect 1
Wide open again.Quote:
Originally Posted by CupWinner99
Abbey 0 - 3 Coonagh
Murroe 7 - 0 Croom
Holycross 1 - 2 St.Pats
cant believe Park let it slip at home..they must be gutted having had a huge advantage...Quote:
Originally Posted by larrywhite
By those results it looks like Croom have thrown in the towel...pity as it was set up for a great finish with them still to play Prospect...Its Prospects to throw away now.
Well done to Croom...enjoy next year in 1A.
who / when are the cup semis? Anyone a draw yet....?
Good job you put me on!;)Quote:
Originally Posted by larrywhite
Croom...Pl 20 / Pts 46 (Max 52)....PROMOTED AS CHAMPIONS
Prospect...Pl 20 / Pts 37 (Max 43)
Fairview...Pl 21 / Pts 37 (Max 40)
Park.....Pl 20 / Pts 35 (Max 41)
Coonagh...Pl 20 / Pts 34 (Max 40)
Shels.......Pl 21 / Pts 31 (Max 34)
Knockainey...Pl 19 / Pts 25 (Max 34)
Murroe.....Pl 19 / Pts 24 (Max 33)
St.Pats....Pl 19 / Pts 18 (Max 27)
Pike B.......Pl 20 / Pts 18 (Max 24)
Holycross...Pl 18 / Pts 15 (Max 27)
Abbey.......Pl 19 / Pts 11 (Max 20)
Results
Tuesday 06th May
Holycross 1-2 St.Pats
Murroe 7-0 Croom
Abbey 0-3 Coonagh
Park 0-1 Prospect
Fixtures
Saturday 10/05/08 (18.45)
Holycross v Abbey
St.Pats v Pike
Knockainey v Shels
Sunday 11/05/08 (10.30)
Croom v Coonagh
Park v St.Pats (St.Pats also down to play Pike eveing before??? TBC)
Tuesday 13/05/08 (18.45)
Fairview v Holycross
Coonagh v St.Pats
Pike v Abbey
Thursday 16/05/08 (18.45)
Croom v Prospect
Knockainey v Murroe
Remaining games: HOME GAMES IN CAPS (BOLD means fixture list completed)
(2) Croom : COONAGH, PROSPECT,
(1) Fairview : HOLYCROSS
(2) Prospect : croom, holycross
(2) Park : ST.PATS, murroe
(2) Coonagh : ST.PATS, croom,
(1) Shels : knockainey
(3) Knockainey : MURROE, SHELS, abbey,
(4) Holycross : PROSPECT, ABBEY, fairview, murroe
(3) Murroe : PARK, HOLYCROSS, knockainey
(3) St Pats : PIKE, coonagh, park,
(2) Pike : ABBEY, st.pats
(3) Abbey : KNOCKAINEY, pike, holycross
Park 0 Prospect 1
Good win for prospect badly needed after a string of draws.
It was 0-0 at the break it was a poor first half with the ball up in the air for most of it park had a half chance or 2. Prospect were much the better team in the second half playing some good football and got their reward with 20 mins to go that man kelly again getting the only goal of the game.
Well done to park on a fine set up fine dressing rooms and a fab pitch.
Abbeyvale is the 2 points prospect were rewarded from the St.pats game over the illegel player included in that updated table?
Excellent result for Murroe but for Croom to lose by 7 is embarrassing i have to say whether they won the league or not.Hope they havent packed it in cos its one of the best finishes in 1B in years.Quote:
Originally Posted by Final Frontier
Cant believe how Park let it slip either.A draw even would have set them up nicely for their last two games.
that's 1B for u.:D:D:D
No B players involved this season at all. In past few seasons the odd player would tog out with A team when they were stuck, but rare these days.Quote:
Originally Posted by messi
Favour done by Croom for Murroe I see..Quote:
Originally Posted by larrywhite
Someone else already asked this on the previous page. That match was only played last Thursday so if there was an objection lodged the very earliest it could have been discussed at the LDMC was last night. They would then ask the team in question to attend the meeting the week after so the very earliest that there could be a decision on this is next Tuesday night.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spudd
Do you personally think they will get these points,has there been a case of this already in any of the divisions this season??Quote:
Originally Posted by larrywhite
no i,m afraid .but in fairness it would be a poor reflection on our a team if any of the b team were involved cos apart fom maybe 2/3 the interest and commitment is,nt there.also there is none of them even nearly good enough.agree with you tho,would be nice to see someone pushingQuote:
Originally Posted by messi
If they trained maybe one or two of our lads could be decent squad players for the Premier team, but who wants to be just a squad player??? That's the point of B teams, so lads can play ball every week. A few subs with the A team are too proud or arrogant to sign a B form. They'd rather warm the bench every week. That's their own choice. Not for me though. I just want to play ball for Pike. If it can't be Pike A then Pike B does me just fine.Quote:
Originally Posted by hoops12
I thought Prospect played Knockainey last Thursday? The chairman of the LDMC was out at the Park Croom game on the Sunday and he confirmed that Prospect were being awarded 2 points for the St. Pat's incident.Quote:
Someone else already asked this on the previous page. That match was only played last Thursday so if there was an objection lodged the very earliest it could have been discussed at the LDMC was last night. They would then ask the team in question to attend the meeting the week after so the very earliest that there could be a decision on this is next Tuesday night.
Awful result for Park last night was at the game and both teams were woeful. What situation does that leave Park in?
They now need favours from others.Quote:
Originally Posted by shanman2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pike B
I cant see that happening.
But i can see Croom doing Prospect a hugh favour when they play each other.:D
Croom have no intrest whatsoever now. Prospect should beat them.Quote:
Originally Posted by gerrard27
If Prospect can provide proof they will get the points.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spudd
According to the results on here they played last Thursday:Quote:
Originally Posted by ParkLife
The earliest an objection could have been posted (and it has to be registered post) was Friday which would have been received at the earliest yesterday, seeing as Monday was a bank holiday. If it was received yesterday it would have been read out at last nights LDMC meeting.Quote:
Originally Posted by abbeyvale
How the LDMC chairman could confirm that the points will be awarded on Sunday before an objection had even been received by the LDMC is most baffling. Even then St.Pats are entitled to due process so as I said already the earliest there could be a decision on this is next Tuesday night.
But its not surprising at all to hear that the LDMC have already made their decision before even discussing it with the entire committee present.
hi pike b, can't believe you are slagging players who are sitting on the bench, training week in week out and trying to play at the highest level. who may be the subs who have been on the bench and who you think should sign b forms. Most of the players in the A squad have played plenty of games. There squad is not big enough to have the same players on the bench each week...Quote:
Originally Posted by Pike B
There's no harm in signing a B form at the start of the year, for the weeks when they know they won't play. Which there are a lot of especially at the start of the season. Then when the squad needs them they go up. This would improve the B team no end. And let lads on the fringes of the A team play regular football, so when they get the call up they are match fit. What's wrong with that????Quote:
Originally Posted by Goals4fun
And just for the record, I'm not slagging any of them. Merely pointing out an opinion. I am one of those few Pike people, who hopes both our teams does well. Not just the A team my friend..Quote:
Originally Posted by Goals4fun
totalyy agree with goalsfor fun,the there is no comparison between prem and 1b so understand why they think its beneath them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pike B
Just been contacted by Pat Sheehan of the Leader asking to nominate players for team of the season in each Division.
Any suggestion?
But would it not suit them to play 90 minutes, even at a lower level? And it would improve the standard of our B team. You do care about our B team now don't you? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by hoops12
[QUOTE=larrywhite;936830]If Prospect can provide proof they will get the points.
According to the results on here they played last Thursday:
The earliest an objection could have been posted (and it has to be registered post) was Friday which would have been received at the earliest yesterday, seeing as Monday was a bank holiday. If it was received yesterday it would have been read out at last nights LDMC meeting.
How the LDMC chairman could confirm that the points will be awarded on Sunday before an objection had even been received by the LDMC is most baffling. Even then St.Pats are entitled to due process so as I said already the earliest there could be a decision on this is next Tuesday night.
But its not surprising at all to hear that the LDMC have already made their decision before even discussing it with the entire committee present.[/QUOT
The points in question are against Pats, they played Knockainey on the Thurs. St Pats game was the week before and they have been awarded the points no question about it. Park have only themselvs to blame, been very inconsistant since Christmas and in some cases bloody awful. 1b is a crazy division but interesting if your team is not involved
Well this should be interesting...Quote:
Originally Posted by barryk
I have been to a good few games out of pure boredom and heres my 2 pence worth....
Have to really concentrate on top 4 teams....
Ps Names not a strong point but lads here will most likely know them !!!!!!!!
Goals: The Croom Keeper
Rightful: Croom lad
Centrehalf: The Coonagh Captain/ The Croom Black hair guy...
Leftful: Prospect lad
Middle: Keith Doran (Coonagh), Small Park lad shaved Head, English lad (Coonagh) Eddie (Park)
Front: Pip Maloney & Prospect Goal machine of late....(Or Knockainey tall guy)
You know your players!!!!:DQuote:
Originally Posted by Final Frontier
steven kelly the prospect player id say scoring goals for yearsQuote:
Originally Posted by Final Frontier
Ya thats him scored the winner against park again the other night great to get a goal.Quote:
Originally Posted by see's it
Well lads.
I think 1B managers should put forward their best players who they think deserves to be on 'team of the season'.From wat i've seen so far players from CROOM PARK COONAGH and PROSPECT are only been mentioned.
Just because there up at the top of the league.Fairview are up there as well but none of their players were mentioned which they should have been.
There's a few more from other teams that should have been mentioned as well.
Murroe keeper was very impressive against us in both games.
I agree with you.I dont know the keeper personally but he played well against us in the league and cup.Pulled off some great saves and he's not frightened to come off his line as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by larrywhite
If CROOM were to field their best 11 then i could see them take all 3pts but both teams have a history going back to a couple of years ago when a young lad was knocked down and killed.They play a memorable match every year before the league kicks off.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pike B
Memorial match, no?Quote:
Originally Posted by gerrard27
What a thing to say and if true its a nice touch from both clubs.Are u trying to say that croom will let prospect win , there was no holding back when they played each other in cals and prospect won that 1 nil.Quote:
Originally Posted by gerrard27