Printable View
Good correction. My brain was saying 2008, 2012 and 2016, when really it was 2012, 2016 and 2020. So the intervening decade is even better than the 2000s, which it's being claimed was the high-water-mark for LOI in Europe.Quote:
Originally Posted by Buller
We have a plan for stadium development. I’m sure you know about this already. Will satisfy Europe Q3 but also grounds need to be maintained / updated in general.Quote:
Originally Posted by EatYerGreens
The best part of when we had our good spell 10 or so years ago is that we have ground improvements to show for it
You are aware it's a lot easier to qualify for a group stage now?Quote:
Originally Posted by EatYerGreens
We were 29th in the UEFA rankings in 2010, had dropped to 43rd four years later, and have been low 30s/high 40s ever since
https://www.connachtrugby.ie/connach...-sportsground/Quote:
Originally Posted by EatYerGreens
"The the capacity will be in the region of 12,000 spectators."
"The facilities will also be made available to other sporting bodies and community groups where such demand arises."
I haven't seen any detail on the seating capacity. Hopefully the Sportsground redevelopment will suit any Connacht team qualifying for the UEFA group stages.
You are aware that European club football is much more compeititve now than it was even just a decade ago - with previous whipping-boy category clubs and leagues now significantly reduced in number ?Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
Was it easier to qualify for the group stages in 2012 than it was in 2010 btw ?
You seem to have adopted a position that Irish clubs are worse in Europe now than they were a decade-plus ago, and will defend it to the hilt no matter what the results suggest. The rankings are important but cover a 5yr period, so are slow at reflecting changes in fortune. Let's see where the league finishes up at the end of this European campaign, and then compare that to individual years in the 2000s.
I'm happy to hear arguments to the contrary, but when you ignore the fact that Dundalk's most recent Euro qualification wouldn't have happened because (a) they wouldn't have dropped into the EL and (b) the draw they got (Andorra, Moldova, Faroes) was almost uniquely lucky, then it's hard to feel your point has value.
Similarly, Drogheda might have made the groups in 2008 but transfer to the EL wasn't a thing for them, even after winning a round. Or Rovers can reach the groups this year by beating a Maltese and a North Macedonian team; in 2008, Bohs lost to an Austrian team (narrowly) but had no second (or even third) bite at the cherry.
Like it or not, this impacts on the comparison of Euro performances between the 00s and the 10s, and is why I'd value the rankings - even though not perfect - over the number of times we've achieved something that is now demonstrably easier to achieve.
If lower European teams have caught up on us significantly as you suggest, then that's the same as saying we've gone backwards (relatively speaking).
https://i.imgur.com/TgcydPd.png
Analysis of the last 20 odd years here. If we could break 2.000 it would be the first time to do that consecutively which would be a milestone of sorts. No doubt our country ranking of 29 back in 2010 stands out. Years are to end of a particular season therefore 2023 is this season ( 2022- 2023 )
https://mobile.twitter.com/stpatsfc/...89627094585348
CSKA/Pats live on the RTÉ news channel on Thursday…..
Is Sligos' game live?
I think a qualification there has to be that more chances for the CL side and easier games for the non CL sides are both going to see coefficients rise over time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Real ale Madrid
(It'd also be nice to see the ranking scaled more usefully than 25-95! :) )
Definitely for the CL teams across the boards - but I'm not sure the non CL teams fixtures are going to be easier than previous years, it will very much depend on seeding.Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
Dont think so Pateen unless its on loi tv perhaps?Quote:
Originally Posted by pateen
This is nice, thank you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Real ale Madrid
Can you do requests? If so would it be possible to drop the cumulative and show actual points earned alongside points per year (so number before and after averaging for number of teams).
Also, and this is probably a separate graph. But our cumulative (as bars) with lines tracking 30th and 40th place cumulative values.
I think it is - no preliminary round and only 60 teams in round 1 as against 94 in the 2019/20 EL.Quote:
Originally Posted by Real ale Madrid
So that's seven weak teams added and 41 strong ones removed, which can only translate to easier ties. (Except for Pat's this year, who started in round 2, another indication of the relative weakness of round 1)
Rte are looking for some form of award for showing the match. It's carried on radio sports news bulletins (Radio One and 2fm), it's rolling on their news channel and Declan McBennett has tweeted about it.Quote:
Originally Posted by joey B
Yes that is correct alright. I'd like to see average co-efficient per round but the first round is absolutely objectively easier as you point out. Still think getting to 2.000 would be a good step forward for the league - our three year average as it stands is over 2 - over 5 years if we could get to approx. 10.000 as a country that would bring us to roughly 33nd place - still 4 off our best ever achieved with a cumulative total of 9.499 (2010) which again shows the relative difficultly of winning ties. I think we are starting to trend towards that type of 32 / 33rd place overall which would be a good start. We ranked 32nd last year and 34th the year before so again shows an upward trend.Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
Nobody ever watches RTE News Now otherwise so they have to make people aware somehow.Quote:
Originally Posted by Olé Olé
LOI isn't good enough for RTE but when you get to Europe the GAA hugging vultures start to circle and suddenly they think LOI is brilliant. We have got by for 2 years with LOI TV albeit we had to pay. As far as I know and I can be corrected the away team get international TV rights and the home team only get national TV rights.Quote:
Originally Posted by Olé Olé
Only reason I did that was to keep them separate, but on one handy glanceable table!Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
Plus values are in reversible order as higher = better in most people's brain ( not mine tbf ). In this case the higher up on the secondary axis = lower ranking which from a rankings standpoint is obviously better.
If you just multiply the Points per year by 4 you get the total. I think people here are more familiar with the average number so put that in.Quote:
Originally Posted by A N Mouse
I'd have to create a data set with the 30th and 40th team each year - will take a while - I'm not sure what you would get out of it though - average 30th is roughly 11-12 points - 40th is probably 7-8 ish?Quote:
Originally Posted by A N Mouse
But if other countries are also getting a coefficient boost, then the 10.000 mark is going to drop over the next three years.Quote:
Originally Posted by Real ale Madrid
Though there is going to be an accordion affect too to an extent in that leagues that skip QR1 (from 42 up currently, with 30 up getting two byes) will be losing out on coefficient points but that doesn't mean they're weaker
In the Europa League playoff draw tomorrow Rovers/Shkupi will be drawn against either a priority 1 team:
KAA Gent (BEL)
FK Austria Wien (AUT)
Heart of Midlothian FC (SCO)
Sivasspor (TUR)
Dnipro-1 (UKR)
Silkeborg IF (DEN)
or a priority 2 team which is the losers of one of:
PFC Ludogorets 1945 (BUL)/GNK Dinamo (CRO)
FK Crvena zvezda (SRB)/FC Pyunik (ARM)
FC Sheriff Tiraspol (MDA)/FC Viktoria Plzeň (CZE)
Qarabağ FK (AZE)/Ferencvárosi TC (HUN)
FK Bodř/Glimt (NOR)/FK Žalgiris Vilnius (LTU)
Maccabi Haifa FC (ISR)/Apollon Limassol FC (CYP)
For the Conference it will be the winners of one of:
Víkingur Reykjavík (ISL)/KKS Lech Poznań (POL)
RFS (LVA)/Hibernians FC (MLT)
Ballkani (KOS)/KÍ Klaksvík (FRO)
HŠK Zrinjski (BIH)/FC Tobol Kostanay (KAZ)
FC Shakhtyor Soligorsk (BLR)/CFR 1907 Cluj (ROU)
Not necessarily. We could be completely stagnant at the same level! Just because other glasses have been topped up a bit doesn't mean our own can't be sitting half empty all these years.Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
The FAI and league as a whole should still benchmark against other leagues. We agree there. We obviously disagree on the leagues relative strength versus itself over time. I think we are seeing a better style of football lately with some really good players scattered around. We had the standout good players before but I think the overall product is better now than it was. It's changed so much though both in terms of the type of player and manager in the league. Would Rovers or Dundalk's championship winning team beat the teams from the 2000s? I wouldn't write them off doing so. Would you?
Yeah I agree. It looks like 15.000+ is going to be what is needed to be top 30 within a few years of this format. (20/21 only had one leg games which has thrown the cycle of this format a little bit).Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
Looking at the table for last year in isolation (https://kassiesa.net/uefa/data/method5/ccoef2022.html), 2.875 had us in 32nd, 2.000 would have only placed 38th and Bulgaria in 30th place had 3.375.
Extrapolating this for the next 5 years and account a little for lower leagues finding it easier to pick up points, I think it's fair to estimate 30th place will be in and around the 15.000 mark by 25/26 which is about the minimum time frame we could realistically expect to be near there.
Virgin Media have the rights to the Europa League and Conference League. They should the one's coming under scrutiny. VM Three could be utilised to show LoI qualification rounds.Quote:
Originally Posted by Olé Olé
Wouldn't write them off for sure. Stephen Kenny's Dundalk are I think the best LoI side I've seen, and while I don't think this Rovers team are as good, they're not bad either (though so need to prove themselves in Europe I think)Quote:
Originally Posted by ontheotherhand
Though I suppose it links into another point in comparing strength - the champions of the 00s were generally pushed a lot more than the champions lately. There's typically a 10 point gap back to second and often 20 back to third these days. We haven't really had a title race worthy of the name in a few years, and we don't have the variety of clubs capable of winning the league as we did ten or so years ago.
I might do up some quick stats on that later to chart that and see if it isn't just me mis-remembering! But that'd point to a lack of depth in quality behind the champions
That's not strictly true true. 4 teams (in contributing comps) came in round about 2009/10, and one year we had five teams compete. The total gives more accurate reflection of matches won/drawn, while the co-efficient value show what we got - effort vs rewardQuote:
Originally Posted by Real ale Madrid
It's the change over time. I'm fairly sure those values are higher now than 1998/99. Interested if can see the effect of competition changes on the values. Three to four teams, prelim rounds, back to three comps, second/third chances for some etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by Real ale Madrid
It's all well and good saying we were ranked 30th once. If that was during 3 teams and (for sake of argument) required 6 coefficient points, which could be achieved by one team getting through two rounds and one of the others winning a dead rubber. And now it's 10 points, which for 4 teams is each team winning a tie home and away, or one team going through 3 rounds, and a couple of dead rubbers
Good point on the change to 4 teams - happened later than I thought, in 2009 as you say
For what it's worth, when we were 29th (in 2010), that was four years of three teams and one of four teams (as indeed it was for everyone around our level)and we had 9.541 points (and then a big gap of 2.000 to 28th). Ten years later (ie 2020) 29th was 16.645 - obviously an extra team means extra points, but also extra bites at the cherry and now extra group spots
That's probably fair yeah. It might be just us remember the good battles between sides and not the walkovers but it feels right. We've tended to have strong champions with a big gap between them and the middle of the pack more recently. I do think it's a bit better the past few seasons but that's probably just because that Dundalk side were so good. Now we have Rovers who are a good side and absolutely the best in the league but they can be beaten on any given Friday by anybody really and the top 3 in particular have reasonably comparable best 11s.Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
A casual glance, just looking at the league winners early in the 2000s and late in the 2000s (who unfortunately were Bohs) might tell us something. They narrowly won their 2002/2003 titles with a fairly competitive chasing pack both years but ran away with the 2008 title and although it got closer again in 2009 at the very top, the gap to 3rd was still fairly large.
Good to see them actually promote itQuote:
Originally Posted by Olé Olé
Cheers Martinho.Quote:
Originally Posted by Martinho II
That's a balls, not on Premier Sports either.
Maybe Norwegian TV might carry it.
Haha. This made me laugh.Quote:
Originally Posted by EatYerGreens
What a load of horse manure. Thanks for pointing out our 'problems' to us. I'm sure it wasn't meant but it is the condescending tripe that Sligo Rovers fans hear fairly regularly. There is an attitude out there that Sligo Rovers should almost know there place.
Well funk that. Sligo Rovers set our own standards and will raise our own bar. Why shouldn't we have the best of the best. Its our club and we strive to be the best club in the league, on and off the pitch.
Btw, the masterplan is for a 6000 seater Category 3 stadium and Ive no doubt we will achieve it. Cat 3 floodlights being installed soon and planning & construction drawings currently being compiled.
Fair enough - i'll have a look.Quote:
Originally Posted by A N Mouse
Ye're surely close enough to it now that there'd be no reason not to go for that, no?Quote:
Originally Posted by redobit
Europe aside, our grounds are generally crap and any moderate improvements have to be welcome
To add to the info on Rovers' pot, Pat's and Sligo can get -
St Pat’s
Brondby IF (Denmark) or FC Basel (Switzerland)
Breidablik (Iceland) or Istanbul Basaksehir (Turkey)
FC Kyzylshar (Kazhkstan) or APOEL (Cyprus)
Fiorentina (Italy)
Sligo Rovers
Neftçi (Azerbaijan) or Rapid Vienna (Austria)
Villarreal (Spain)
Dunajska Streda (Slovakia) or Fotbal Club FCSB (Romania)
Maccabi Tel Aviv (Israel) or Aris Thessaloniki (Greece)
It's hard to see how to get past any of those, unless the Icelandics fluke their way through
Its being broadcast alright. Not sure if it’s free or what the story is with it mind.Quote:
Originally Posted by pateen
My mother has it on in the kitchen constantly. I know rolling news is inheretly fairly repetitive, but RTE News is literally the same thing shown every hour.Quote:
Originally Posted by Longfordian
To put that into context if we take the year earlier 2008/09 (just so all seasons had 3 teams). We were 30th with 9.499, and in 2018/19 30th had 15.625.Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
If you divide each by 5 then find out what kind of results need to average to stand still. (9.499/5) 1.899, between three teams, would need 5 wins and a draw.
And (15.625/5) 3.125, between four teams, is 12 wins and a draw.
So far this year we've played 12 matches, won 5 drew 3
Last year played 20, won 10 drew 3 - for 11.5 divided by 4 teams 2.875, best since 2006/07 when played 14, won 6, drew 4 should be 8 but 8.5 (cos final round scored more) divide by 3 for 2.833.
Stop being such an insecure princess/snowflake. I'm doing my degree in Sligo (ATU), so know the town and club very well.Quote:
Originally Posted by redobit