Why does any club anywhere spend if they're still not going to challenge for the title?
Why does any club anywhere spend if they're still not going to challenge for the title?
But most clubs aren't also doing big fundraising drives, fans doing 24 hours fasts, gigs being organised, Save Our Bohs programmes being launched. It's either a case of you not needing to that stuff to actually save the club, or you're wasting that money on finishing 5th instead of 9th.
Its just far too strong a squad so far for a club meant to be fighting to overcome a gigantic debt. By all means Fenlon should be looking to sign good players, but his job right now is to find good players that everyone else doesn't know already are good players, because those players command more wages, and would be stupid not to do so as there are still plenty of clubs out there looking for players. To suggest Burns, Price, Flood and Bayly could not have gotten a decent contract elsewhere would be insanity.
Bohs aren't learning their lessons, they're saying they are, they're able to say what the lesson they've learned is, but when it comes down to it, again they're spending money on a squad hoping it will bring in finance through success. Granted, the success they're chasing is no longer Champions League group stage. But realistically Bohs aim should have been sign a squad cheap enough to stay in the Premier Division this year and no more expensive than that. Just because a club survives one year after financial issues, doesn't mean they're out of the mire. Galway and Drogheda should be a lesson of that. Cork before them. Bohs are making the same mistakes on a lesser scale and the results will probably work out something similar, while the fans will be much less enthusiastic about forking out wads of cash to save the club again.
i had a response typed out for you jicked but this website has been hanging on me occasionally for about two weeks now (anyone else having this problem?).
Anyway, the jist of it was i dont think there will be a huge difference in budgets outside the top 3 clubs (presumably you, Sligo and Dundalk). The next 4 or 5 will all have equivalent budgets. I also said that i think that at crowds of 1600-2200 we are already down to our hardcore. (clarify: 1600-2200 is attendances, not just Bohs fans)
If we had signed 3 young players like Fagan or Joyce instead of Burns, Bayly and Price would you still be having a go? I suspect you would irerspective of who we signed. Where also has it been stated that there will be no relegation this year?
I also understand that you dont get what we are doing. Thats fine. You may be proven right. Is there much point in continuing this?
l4s, how did I defend SF to the hilt? Asking for balance to the debate is not backing to the hilt. Likewise people claiming they know exact figures is also open to question. I think that's quite clear, right?
Skstu, everyone else is making guesses and estimates, though I agree the higher amount is probably a stretch too far. Osarusan (+Dodge), you also have to factor in UEFA money, I forget the minimum though it's probably in the region of 100k. "Glamour" friendlies are still allowed, though only 2.
We can all guesstimate what each club is shelling out, though unless club secretaries start posting up exact figures then it's all pie in the sky.
Doubt it. Either way we wouldn't know if Bohs hadn't splashed out on players not in keeping with the budget of a club who is trying to merely survive. Bray have that kind of budget, their squad reflects this. UCD the same. Drogheda the same. Monaghan will also have the same. Bohs seem to have decided that since they will have a bigger income than these clubs (and they're right, they will have) that this should automatically go into the playing budget, which given Bohs situation seems absolute madness.
Please note "apparently", you'd be completely off your nut not to notice the word. Sligo and Rovers would have more a chance of raising in excess of a million because of their home attendances and prizemoney, though it would be a surprise if it were that amount.
no CSF - that is my assumption. Bohs havent decided anything other than, after restrtucturing our debt and getting rid of most of our squad, to sign a certain number of players within a certain budget. Like every other club in the league and with all due consideration to its other obligations.
You're too kind :-) I was going to say it was the first of two words, the second being hole, that posters who know for sure what other clubs have or haven't discuss the matter through :-) Not excluding anyone including myself :-)
It may have been a step too far for humanity, and my apologies for not including the mega money the Candystripes are ploughing into players and staff, made worse by currency exchange rates, of course!
the fundraising/loan scheme was to pay off the players and to pay towards a significant chunk of the squad costs for this year. We knew what we were doing it for. The one thing i do agree with CSFShels is that if this does all go pear shaped again, there is no more money there for the Board. I will not give another iota to the club if this happens again. twice bitten and all that...
Question for Ezekial and Jicked. Oman (Rovers) and Byrne (Dundalk) were two huge earners for Bohs last season. On massive money. What sort of money did you offer them to sign for you?
I'm not at home in Dublin and wont be for a few weeks, at the AGM we'll have an idea of what players are on. But we offered a Oman a wage that he turned down to sign with Fingal, so it's not like we were desperate to sign him at any cost, and whatever price it is it'll be less than what Fingal had offered to pay him, which in turn would have been less than he was at at Bohs.
thanks. I just wanted to show that the high earners are not earning as much or nearly as much as they did previously.
Fair enough so, but have seen Derry go down that round enough times and I've a feeling you guys might want to keep the pitchforks handy...
Glad we're flying under the radar for once...! Probably jinxed it now though...
No doubt about it, but even at those reduced rates we outbid our rivals Dundalk, Pats, Sligo for Oman (for arguments sake, I've no idea if those teams were interested in that particular player, but it is fair to say we're going up against those clubs for the top players). On one hand we hear that Bohs aim is to consolidate, stay up, don't care about the competitiveness of the team etc which would make Bray/UCD/Mons/Drogs your rivals, but these signings significantly outbid what those clubs are spending, so if that's the aim you are spending over the odds of what is needed to put together a squad at that level.
On a bit of a side issue, what's Fenlon on for the year, when's his deal up and did he take one of the paycuts the players took that time?
From what I remember of the Bohs accounts that leaked a few months back, Bohs' total current account earnings for '09 were around the 1.3 million mark. Assuming that crowds will be down from the heights of the title-winning seasons and commercial revenue will definitely be down, there's no way they'll be able to budget anything close to that.
Can I throw my 2 cents in here? To be honest, I'm a Derry fan and I'm fed up reading the attacks on Bohs. I assume most people on here are just your run of the mill fans, not privy to the "commercially sensitive" information about the wages of people at a club. Sporting Fingal has hit the wall, Galway may just aswell have it seems. That is two less top employers for a footballer in Ireland. Therefore it is a clubs market. Players have to be alot more flexible just to ensure they get signed. For all we know, Bohs have managed to get these players on seriously reduced wages. If it all goes up the left in a few months time, you can all shout I told ya so at SkStu and every other Bohs fan on here. If the club hasn't learnt it's lesson by now that it can't risk massive budgets, I'm sure most of their fans won't open their wallets to bail them a second time and they can go to the wall.
Jicked,
the thing is we are always going to spend more than those clubs. Always. Our aim is to stay up and consolidate. Nothing we have done suggests otherwise. Especially that you acknowledge that we likely are paying a lot less for Burns, Price and Bayly than they previously were paid.
AFAIK Fenlon has taken one pay cut since he joined Bohs. Im not sure of exact figures so i wont post here but i have speculated on the Bohs mb.
Where are Boh's likely to finish this season? With the bottom club set to face a relegation play-off at the end of the season, Boh's should be capable of finishing 8th or 9th, safe enough from relegation?
Bohs will be pushing for Europe, top 5. It's almost certainly a 2 horse race between Sligo and Rovers, now I'm beginning to wonder if they haven't devised a diabolical east-west cartel with the FAI to have them both breakaway and join the Sky Premier League North (Scotland) to replace Rangers and Celtic when they go to Sky Premier League South next year.
I know it's not you making the decisions, but I think comments like this show that you don't really appreciate the situation. When Shels were Shelegated, their budget to start the first was tiny - easily smaller than ours, I'd say. It's grown since then, but they didn't go off signing league winners after going broke. (In fact, they loaned a load of players off us). Bohs have to go the same way, and if it means swallowing your pride and being smaller than poor ickle Bray/UCD/Monaghan for a year or two to ensure that this isn't your last season in senior football, then so be it.
And Bolger turned down a contract offer from Bohs after Fingal went bust, yet Dundalk were able to sign him so I guess it's swings and roundabouts and might come down to who a player wants to play for and why?
Lots of players have turned down offers from Bohs and have taken employment elsewhere.
http://www.independent.ie/sport/socc...n-2542219.html
Quote:
BOHEMIANS will operate on a budget of approximately €250,000 this season -- 15pc of what they were spending three years ago......
Relax everyone, no need for the big fuss after all. Bohs are operating on a prudent budget of €250k!
Pat Fenlon should immediately be head hunted for the Dept of Finance if he can assemble this squad along with "two or three more players" on that budget
If you assume that he ends up with a small squad of 16 and that the four already under contract are only costing in the region of €3,000 per week over 52 weeks, that leaves an average of €210 per week over 37 weeks for each of the remaining 12 players
New Contracts
- Liam Burns
- Aidan Price
- Ger O’Brien
- Chris Fagan
- Anto Flood
- Robert Bayly .
- Daniel Joyce
- Gary Burke
- Mark Rossiter
Previously under contract
- Chris O’Connor
- Brian Murphy
- Owen Heary
- Glenn Cronin
fair enough. I didnt mean it as a dig. I do appreciate the situation, of course i do, but I think you are guilty of ignoring all the other factors i mentioned or else just not giving them any credence and to be honest, thats fine, that your prerogative and you may well be proven right. As an aside, i believe we could have not signed Burns and Flood but the others i have no problem with and again it all depends on how much they are being paid which thankfully, Ezeikial has clarified.
... or about as likely as player opts to sign for former big club with a record for illegaly sacking players/coaches (oh, sorry they reached a settlement :rolleyes:) and cutting salaries in mid season ? :) despite bigger salary offer.
Persoanlly I think any player depending on LOI for steady income shows masochistic tendencies.
As people on here are questioning our budget does anyone have any real evidence or is this just the usual trawling ? if anyone has any REAL information contridicting what was stated at yesterdays press conference then post it