Yep still laughing here too...
Printable View
Yep still laughing here too...
Ack, you boys and your sackbiting jokes. It's always the feckin same.
The 6-5 game was in March 1959. Rovers top, waterford 2nd, Rovers 4-1 up in the 2nd half and Waterford came back to win 6-5. I don't think there was another one. Rovers still own the title.
You are correct re the Giles era though. Rovers had been terrible, bottom in 1976, 11th in 1977 then Giles arrived and brought back the old pros. The team played pretty football but drew a lot of games. Giles did win the cup although don't mention that in Sligo or neutral Dublin referees. :D
Rovers were a decent top 4 or 5 team in the late 70's/early 80's. McLaughlin did transform them though into the best team in the country. Dermot Keely and Noel King made a huge difference as Rovers fans claim they added a bit of steel that was lacking under Giles. To fans of other clubs they were allowed get away with murder on the pitch. They did allow the like sof Pat Byrne and Liam O'Brien etc to play.
I accept totally that Kilcoyne betrayed Rovers and greed ruled. KRAM were 100% frustrated. What I could gather was that KRAM didn't have a legal basis to stop it, they couldn't even compel a discussion not to mention a negotiation with Kilcoyne. Kilcoyne had the club tied up.
My point is not immaterial, I have worked on preparing constitutions for many different clubs/societies, in no way should Rovers have been exposed to the greed or financial ineptitude of any chairman, no way should it have been depending on its Chairman to have good will in order for it to have a ground to function.
A good constitution is the foundation of a club, history or fai cups are feck all use in a court when it comes to determining who owns the ground or who has the right to take the decision to sell.
Any of the older fans on here have an idea of what it cost to go to other grounds at the time??
My dad nearly choked there when I told him it was £4 into Milltown in the early 80s and said he certainly would have been picking and choosing his games if he was a Rovers fan
1978 FAI Cup final Sligo v Shamrock Rovers
48th minute (first half) very dubious penalty awarded by John Carpenter gave Rovers a 1-0 win. Mention that cup final to a Sligo fan and it is sure to provoke a reaction.
There always seemed to be a Dublin referee when a Dublin side met a provincial side. JC was one of the better refs in his day but I doubt if he ever holidayed in Sligo again.
Don't know what all the fuss is about Milltown was like Waterford UTD's ground without the running track with a terrace with a bit of a roof on the other side, and the club sat on their hands for over 50 years when Irish land prices were the cheapest in the EEC Boo Hoo for the Shams 20 years on get over it
Just one comment for the above spam:Quote:
Originally Posted by Knappagh Red
The reason why they were cheap, was because the country was broke, and couldn't be afforded then, never mind now.
How many of those Jesuits claim to be football people, were made FAI President, and are still involved in the game at an international level though....? :confused:
In otherwords - what responsibility, beyond a very vague moral one, did the Jesuits have to Rovers ? Their job was to look after their religious order - Kilcoynes was to look after his football club. Only one of those 2 failed in their remit.
A very different case though.
That involved moving a club about 80 miles away to a totally different town. Wimbledon fans would hapily have continued to support the Dons had they moved to a new stadium in London, for example - as indeed most did during the very dreary days playing out of Selhurst Park after Plough lane had been vacated.
The Wimbledon fans fleeing the MK Dons debacle was about a team's league place being franchised to a different part of the country- not about the same team moving to a different stadium in the same city.
milltown was a fantastic football stadium, many a great game between waterford and rovers iv seen there,
i also had the pleasure of watching that great rovers team of the 80s play manchester united in there.
its just a pity we dont get many great games today like we did back then. and as for the support! "wow"
Why use 5 when a 100 will do?
If people are going to keep mentioning Sligwegian fans I wish they'd use the proper term.
Just done some looking on the net - and discovered that JC is the only referee from this country to referee a major European Club Final - the second leg of the 1981-82 UEFA Cup Final between IFK Gothenburg and SV Hamburg.
Must have been a decent official to get that big a match...
Otherwise engaged that day as we were celebrating the title win in Athlone that afternoon.
In fairness there were a lot of dodgy attendance figures given for cup ties in the 70's and 80's. A certain club in the south east were no angels either when it came to dividing out the receipts evenly. :D
In otherwords - what responsibility, beyond a very vague moral one, did the Jesuits have to Rovers ? Their job was to look after their religious order - Kilcoynes was to look after his football club. Only one of those 2 failed in their remit.[/QUOTE]
I never said the Jesuits ever had a responsibility to Rovers... what I didn't like is that they made statements after the sale moaning on about how they hadn't intended the ground to be used for houses etc. The reality as I've mentioned already was they they knew full well that the Kilcoynes wanted to re-develop the land.. the reason they knew that is because the Kilcoynes wouldn't of paid them £100k if they had stipulated that a "sports stadium" only clause had to be inserted in the sale terms. So all I'm saying is that the Jesuits weren't as innocent as they pretended to be.
Now back to the real question... is there a bank account somewhere that contains the money that KRAM collected earning interest... would love to know but suspect finding out would be as difficult as following the money trail of a Nazi Swiss bank account...
That's not near enough reason even to support a mild suspicion.
It's not reason enough to suspect the Jesuits of complicity.
The simple explanation is that the Jesuits thought they were dealing with Shamrock Rovers or people who represent the clubs interest just the same as they had been dealing with for decades.
On the other hand, Kilcoyne is on public record in his evidence to the Planning Tribunals that he was well versed in the ways to push projects with or without "enducements".
http://www.planningtribunal.ie/image...ONTENT_114.pdf
Wasn't the first success by Kilcoyne about having an option to buy inserted?
When it comes to Kilcoyne actually taking up the option the Jesuits had nothing more to say, their ownership days were over without condition.