Now you sound a bit worried!
Printable View
Now you sound a bit worried!
shur pike have only hartnett+wallQuote:
Originally Posted by Dr Mad
you sure? ;)
what about their player manager, didnt he play LOI,Quote:
Originally Posted by the hoops
Yeah he did and so did Declan Casey.Quote:
Originally Posted by abbeyvale
thats 4,Quote:
Originally Posted by pearse4t3
ROUND 2 LIMERICK
1 Moyross Utd v Kilfinane Forest FC
2 Ballylanders FC v Ballynanty Rvs
3 Aishling/Annacotty FC v Newport FC
4 Mungret Regional v Fairview Rgs
5 Polonia Luimai FC v Weston Villa FC
6 Caladonians FC v Regional Utd
7 Herberstown FC v Knockainey FC
8 Star Rvs v Elton Cel
9 Wembley Rvs v Pike Rvs
10 Carew Park FC v Granville Rgs.
11 Prospect Priory FC v Trinity Rgs
12 Charlevile FC v Killmallock Utd
13 Abbey Rvs v Glenview Rvs
14 Parkville Utd v Caherdavin Cel
15 Hyde Rgs v Athlunkard Villa FC
16 Hospital FC v St Pauls FC
17 Shannon Town FC v Kilteely FC
18 Kennedy Park FC v Corbally FC
19 Pallas FC v St. Patricks FC
20 Sumerville FC v Croom Utd.
and from these forums...apparently Pa Moloney too...very much doubt it though..oh and Pa McGarry too thats 6 at least...
:confused: :D :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Jock MIB
Quote:
Originally Posted by Green_Hoop
Mcgarry played a friendly that hardly counts and if it does you can count Morris aswell his father played LOI.......
I hear the boro are supposed to be putting in an objection.Something about the match card or other.Anyone hear anything about this.Leather??
Very Possible Monster. I was not at match on sunday but like you have heard whispers..
oh jesus please dont start..........................
Whats the boros arguement Leather??Quote:
Originally Posted by leather
Dont take this as a Dubs v Country thing lads but for years now the country teams have ignored the regrading of ex LOI players and there a few chickens coming home to roost ... the internet means that opponents can now very quickly check up on players past clubs and even match reports.
Not going to spread rumours as i am unsure as to the exact Objection.Quote:
Originally Posted by Monster
enough people will do that..
Quote:
Originally Posted by see's it
Your actually probably serious too...thats the sad thing..You can count wayne o'donovan too so on your theory since his Grandad played for Ireland...
boro weren't given the match card until after the game finished, and they refused to fill it in. they have no objection, they're as much to blame as the referee, card should have been filled oout before the game anyway.
Boro could end up in trouble themselves for not fillin it in when they were given it
Thats what i heard magicman and also heard if that is there arguement they have no chance of winning that objection.Quote:
Originally Posted by magicman
The ref got some abuse at that match on Sunday both during and after the game.
Quote:
Originally Posted by abbeyvale
why is it that conny does start himself?? why not play mcgarry at left full and enright and purcell as centre halves. much better defence than when he includes himself. he looks well past it these days
Makes me laugh at the general hatred at Pike..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Green_Hoop
ive no hatred for pike, think there the best team in town by a mile, with balla there closest rivals. do you not think mitchell, purcell, enright and mcgarry would be better than when conny includes himself?? you must be having a laugh if you think conny should be gettin on that team
You can blame yer supporters for that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Green_Hoop
was with stuart burns last year at wembley , hows he gettin on with ye, very good defender i htought anyway .....
Its funny because its a sunday league game,played by ameteurs yet so many take it so seriously,lighten up lads.
(Waiting on See's it to flame(Just for you,Flaming is the hostile and insulting interaction between Internet users. Flaming usually occurs in the social context of a discussion board,and is usually not constructive, does not clarify a discussion, and does not persuade others. Sometimes, flamers attempt to assert their authority, or establish a position of superiority over other users. Other times, a flamer is simply an individual who believes he or she carries the only valid opinion. This leads him or her to personally attack those who disagree)...again)
^^^Just in case you didn't know what it ment mate,didn't seem like you did last time..
On topic,Conny plays left back because of a lack of left sided options for Pike atm,They played McGarry centre mid a few weeks back and I and many others are of the opinion thats his best position.Its fairly well known Pike are looking for a quality Keeper and/or Left/right backs
as i said i was not at the match and i dont know anything about match cards being filled in or not but i know that there is a rule for the junior cup that clearly states that the match card has to be filled in by both teams prior to the match starting...it is the ref's responsibility to enforce the rule..had a ref refuse to start a fai tie over this before.Quote:
Originally Posted by magicman
if this is the objection then it would be techincal and as we know clubs have won objections before on technicalities.
new keeper and right back? Pike are looking for a left full. As is every other club in town as there is a serious lack of quality players in that position. Conny still does a good job at left full. David McNamara and Paddy Mitchell must be the best in their positions in town. So it would be very hard to get better than them.
We all know that most mathes are started and the card is not filled out.
Its true though that they could win it on a techniality.Only time will tell.
I cannot see that the result would be reversed, but as with technicalities, it might be Voided...i.e replay..Quote:
Originally Posted by Monster
Objection is in no way a reflection on Fairview and i imagine it has more to do with the official.
Well the match kicked off about 12 minutes late as the Boro didn't physically get to the Fairgreen until 10.30!!! I'd imagine this had something to do with it. But if what is being said is the case then i'd like to think Fairview would not get punished for the ref forgetting to get the filled out card back off Boro. Also funny how the Boro,apparently knowing this rule, kept quiet throughout the game! (That is of course if what is being said is true). Clutching at straws if you ask me.Quote:
Originally Posted by leather
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevB76
sssssshhhhhhh, i'm under cover :-)
this is what i have been toldQuote:
Originally Posted by Nesta
(1) boro did not get card untill after final whistle
If the fai junior council deem fit to remove this objection(if there is an objection) fair play but your club didnt even accept their decision when you were involved.. so lets review your clubs TECHNICAL OBJECTION from a few years back.
did you think that geraldines should have been punished (originally given walkover) ?
also why did fairview not inform geraldines that their facility was TECHNICALLY incorrect, when they were well aware of this. The measured the pitch on the saturday.. ??
people in glasshouses...
enright and purcell are too similar to play together in the centre of defence. What you esentially have is two centre halfs and no sweaper. They're both very good at what they do well but mc garry has one of the best football brains in townQuote:
Originally Posted by alwaysblue
[QUOTE=Noddy;777833]new keeper and right back? Pike are looking for a left full. As is every other club in town as there is a serious lack of quality players in that position.
have to disagree there, IMO there's quite a number of quality full backs in town. dee ryan, mick aherne, mark sheehan, dave dunphy to name a few...........
What happened a few years ago with the Dines pitch was a farce....and the majority of players showed their disapproval publicly. Management promptly suffered the consequences. I dont think Geraldines should have been punished, and that the game should have been played and whoever wins wins, both teams playing in the same conditions.Quote:
Originally Posted by leather
What would have made it even worse would have been if the game went ahead, the view lost, but then appealed and won.
Such is my point with sundays fixture. Both teams took to the pitch and a fair game of football was played, with fairview deserving to go through. I'm sorry but any time I see teams afterwards looking to get back in through technicalities (apart from illegally registered players) it makes me sick!! I realise big clubs want whats best for them but there is a time when you just hold your hand up and take defeat graciously.
I personally agree with nearly all that you say but once a precedent is set it is very hard to put the genie back in the bottle..
"What would have made it even worse would have been if the game went ahead, the view lost, but then appealed and won."
that was what happened.. Gearldines were awarded match. fairveiw objected and won replay.. FACT..
McGarry doesnt have any brains :)Quote:
Originally Posted by MitreSize5
stuart burns is a good full back very good technically and strong in the tackle ....
Left backs I meant. Those players you mentioned aren't yet proven full backs anyway.
that objection if boro go ahead with it is ridiculous in the extreme.
:D its up for debateQuote:
Originally Posted by see's it