What other club came close to making a ~780k operating loss last season?
I don't think even Bohs would have lost that amount!
Printable View
It wasnt
Mate dont quote me on the bit that makes your argument more valid. Quote everything i said. Iv never said it will definately work for us Im simply saying im willing to wait and see. Your over the top rant at me is pointless because im not saying what will happen at fingal will work, im just stating that what is happening at most clubs hasnt been working either and people should focus on their own clubs and stop trying to look for the problems with others. Take a chill pill my friend. We are not totally disagreeing.
Its not 100% accurate now is it.
No but not far off it either.
Far enough. Lets take one season at a time shall we , no point going on ifs and maybes . Much to the dislike of some,Sporting Fingal will see out the season and im confident they will start next years season in the division they qualified for on the pitch at the end of this season. Just because you want us gone it doesnt meant it will happen anytime soon so lets just enjoy this season shall we .
1247 at morton on Friday probably max 2-300 rovers fans so Fingal have accumulated 1000 home fans in the space of a few seasons .As a resident of the area I still think its stupid moving to lusk instead of swords but I understand the council are buying part of one of your sponsers landbanks ,so probably makes sense from ongoing funding perspective to keep the sponsors sweet.
The Sporting Fingal / Gerry Gannon relationship was featured on Business Matters this week (TV3)
They questioned whether Gannon could continue to fund Fingal as he is one of the first to be placed in NAMA.
if they are getting crowds of 1000 and they don't deserve to be in the league,then Galway don't too.
Fingal is an administrative county. That's all it is.
I know that counties by their very nature are administrative area but thanks to the GAA (Fingal play as a 'county' in the National Hurling League but that's more to do with the proliferation of hurlers and is part of the greater super Dublin hurling plan to have another panel to take from), counties in Ireland have taken on a serious significance culturally. I work for Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council and I can tell you as a matter of fact that it is not a county in the 'Irish' sense of the word.
Fair dues to someone who has an afffinity to Fingal and not to Dublin, although I find it odd!
The North bank of the Liffey in Lucan is in Fingal and the southside of the village is in South Dublin County and I don't think you could say that they have regional rivalry!
I think it's a difficult for a lot of people on this site and in the wider LOI community in general to look at Fingal and want to them to succeed considering their provenance and their connection to a developer and a wildly dodgy council. I would count me among their number. Being a Shels fan doesn't help either! Fingal fans need to stop acting hard-done-by and having a Millwall attitude and need to start winning the wider community over.
By no means do i feel hard done by :) I didnt expect any diffrent response from a shells fan to be honest. Where are you going with this millwall attitude ?
I think its sad that SOME so called fans of our league would love to see another league club fold and not succeed. The truth is and what is important Sporting Fingal are here and will be here for another while yet . What division we will be in will be decided on the pitch and if we are full or part time and no amout of begrudgery or wishful thinking by those who wish to see us out of the league will change that.
Its only the start of the season lads so lets enjoy it ye. There have been some legit points made on here and i agree with some and im sure that most Fingal fans arent naive to think that our financial status will remain the same for a number of years so like i said earlier we can only deal with whats on the table at the moment and im going to enjoy this season and no amout of negative postings from those who want to see Fingal fold will change that.
I agree with at least half of those conclusions
In saying that, do you mean that most support their clubs and not the league that they are in ?
Appreciate that but if there were no other clubs there would be no league for their club to play in ! personally I support bohs 100% but hope for a successfull league and accordingly don't like to see any club(s) "go under".
Any fan of any LOI club can surely empathise with fans of a club going under ? There but for the grace of God.......
That certainly isn't the impression I get about posters on here.
I think most fans support their own club first, obviously, but also dislike the negative criticism the LOI gets as a result of other clubs' actions. I'd say the vast majority on here want to see a healthy LOI with healthy clubs.
Actually I think the whole "I support my club, not the league" line is just crap that posters think allows them to make stupid attacks on other clubs.
Yeah, most want to see a sustainable league. As things stand, there is no way the current model of SF is sustainable, no matter how people try and dress it up. At this stage the league is in a lose lose - SF carry on inflating wages by unsustainable spending, or they crash and burn in a blaze of negative publicity. It should never have got to this point, but then we're back to "licencing" that it did.
but Sporting Fingal have not breached any of the licencing criteria - I have never even heard it suggested that they did. I don't see how licencing can exclude one large benifactor as this would rule out most clubs (for example I doubt St Pats could have sustained losses in last few years but for one benefactor).
as said before I hope SF are preparing for a "soft landing" or have alternative funding sources in place if/when the Gannon money ceases.
Incidentally because someone goes into NAMA does not mean they are broke (although not a good sign :eek:). I think Gannon (or any other benefactor) can write the investment off against tax so as long as his company(s) generates a tax liability SF will probobly continue to benifit.
Don't think there's any tax breaks available for investing in a sports club. Unless they have charitable status which I would doubt.
UCD AFC is a registered charity. I know we announce that there's tax breaks for things like sponsorsing a table at the club dinner.
I'm not suggesting they breached licensing; just pointing out it's a flaw of the system. There have been a number of examples in recent seasons where a benefactor has pulled the plug and left a club in trouble mid season. Has anything been done to fill that gap in the licencing system?
Imo, if a club is so reliant on benefactor, there should be an upfront bond paid to the league, which can be released back to the club throughout the season. In that case, the worst case scenario is players, staff and club see out the season at least.
Ah come on man. I even said that being a Shels fan will automatically make me not like ye. That's a given. And long may a sustainable rivalry remain. ;)
The hard-done-by attitude is there to be seen. I've yet to see much positivity emanating from Fingal fans tbh. And if there's positivity out there then let's see it. :)
I just think that the wider community of LOI fans are tired of the negativity and we want to see this league finally strengthen. But yet again it seems that the annual crisis is imminent.
It's perfectly acceptable for one man to pump money into a club but the worry here is that this guy is going to lose everything he has when NAMA come knocking.
How will you bridge the 15K per week gap after his assets are frozen?
Has he already given the 2010 money to Fingal?
If so that's fine but we'll have the same problem in 2011 or however long it takes for NAMA to act