Well if it's this years budgets you can take drogs out of your list. I've seen the budget and its far from unrealistic. Its actually embarassing as it shows how unpopular the league must be to have such low income levels.
Printable View
That was Ollie Byrne's line; "No good can come from releasing official crowd figures"
Athlone was how I read it.
He's not my buddy. I know him alright, not that well personally but he would be close to people I do know very well. I wasn't casting aspersions on CCFC in and of itself, more reporting on Tom Coughlan's alleged approach to the parting of ways. At the end of the day Mathews will be alright one way or another so don't think that I want to see ye hammered or anything. My interest is mainly a personal curiosity in how it pans out in a legal sense. That's the area I'm in. I'm going to back away from this thread slowly and with my hands in the air.
Alan was well within his rights not to reduce his wages.Obviously i don't like seeing the club in trouble but they put themselves in this position
His money?
No change with the new owner((s) as we don't know who else is involved with TNB).The same as Arkaga really a manager wins a cup and gets the sac hmm where have i seen that before.
Agree with this completely.
No its definitely not Athlone although they were mentioned in relation to Post dated cheques which will have to be cleared before they get the ok and I think Kildare are in the same boat. There was definitely another Premier Team but i dont know which one.Ours, Brays and Droghrda are the lowest budgets so that leaves anyone of 4.
He did agree to reduce his wages, to his credit, why he didn't then sign the agreed contract is what's at issue.
Arkaga = CCFC = Tom Coughlan.
If that's how you see it fair enough, but Tom Coughlan is suffering more than he should have had to from the Arkaga hangover.
Yes.
If the court rules that he should be given €1million euro, so be it, we should pay it.
But all this talk of what he's owed and how he was treated pre-empting any ruling is a joke IMO.
I knwo who else is involved with TC as of last weekend, no-one else. If he feels that he can't afford the club and in the future wants to bring someone on board as an investor, well it's his club.
As for the comparison to Arkaga, you'd want to cop yourself on. You've a fairly short [or just poor] memory if you can't remember exactly what they did to us.
That's where the comparison starts and ends, beyond that it's unfair.
For the record, I don't believe that Rico should have gone in 2007 and I don't believe that Mathews should have gone in 2008, I think they both deserved another season, but then I was party to the reasons for firing either. Rico's settlement suggests his case was at least partially unfair, Mathews settlement may reveal the same, only time will tell.
According to a Cork work colleague here in Dublin, cheques to CURRENT STAFF have started bouncing around Turners Cross. It will be interesting to hear reports from the forum.
This is what he emailed me earlier today. "Cheques have been bouncing since the New Year apparently to current staff. PFAI now getting involved. FAI have warned Coughlan that unless this is rectified in the next week then they will rescind the Premier License."
Ouch.
Trust me, being one of the main people in the CCOSC doesn't give you visibility to everything happening at the club, you end up relying on the same rumours and drip fed information as everyone else.
There's two people who are responsible for pretty much every scrap of rumour that's come out over recent months, they feed them to a few people on internet forums who spread them, there was a few grains of truth in some of them which has susequently resulted in everything they say treated as gospel now. It's gotten to be a joke tbh. Alot of the issue is that, for some reason, Tom Coughlan and the Club are refusing to fight back, clarify the rumours or put information in the public domain that would clear much of it up. Their silence is bringing it on themselves.
Also, the club is more than just Tom Coughlan, there are a lot of great people working incredibly hard to get our club back to some level who are being undeservedly tarnished by some of the rumours being circulated. Those starting them are doing them a huge disservice, and they should know far better and show far more respect. I think I'll do a Longfordian now and back away with my hands up, i've said my piece.
I that supposed to make a rumour more reliable? I work in Dublin so by logic if I sent you an email it would more believable? :rolleyes:
I still can't understand how a legal dispute with a former employee could lead to a licence being withheld. That is a crazy precedent to set. By that reasoning with CCFC offered 95% settlement & Matthews, now employed by rival club (lets just assume Drogs are rivals) could reject it & get CCFC relegated. :eek:
I was talking to a former cork player this evening who is still owed money
There's a big difference.
Imagine if Pete Mahon were to sue UCD tomorrow morning because he didn't get some bonus (one he was never actually promised). Should our licence be pulled until the court case was decided? Or should we pay up regardless and sue for the money back?
People don't usually make up wages they're owed, but there's often room for dispute, particularly over dismissal procedures in a sacking.
Of course, it's easy to imagine a club claiming that wages aren't really owed to get around that aspect of licensing, but it'd force things to court and probably hurt them in the long run. Not that LoI clubs think long term.
Not daragh Ryan, he was playing at the time
I guessed he was the one mentioned in the herald as being owed €40,000.
Is this what Cork City fans are coming to? Hopefully these 3 to do not represent the true Cork city fans that think Farrelly was letting on he had a serious illness. Disgusting.