Who cares? Care to address the facts about English teams in the UEFA (which takes out the big four)?Quote:
Originally Posted by Lim till i die
Printable View
Who cares? Care to address the facts about English teams in the UEFA (which takes out the big four)?Quote:
Originally Posted by Lim till i die
then why do you follow the team?Quote:
Originally Posted by OwlsFan
you seem to be happy we are crap????
I would love to search thru your posts and see what your expectations were when kerr was in charge. but I wont cause I am too lazy...
interesting that the other expert on coaching Karlos is conspicuous by his absence....I think he said Staunton would make a way better coach than keane....oh how I laughed....
Do you mean me by any chance.......cuase i never said that. I have a bit of cop on
Indeed, never a truer line did you write Bill, you are too lazy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Billsthoughts
Karlos, afair, did not say that about Staunton.
Carloz wrote
No chance of mistaken identity, Karlos could spell :)Quote:
Do you mean me by any chance.......cuase i never said that. I have a bit of cop on
Well for a start it's patently obvious the Italian teams don't give a tossQuote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
My take is that Ireland at present don't belong in the Top 10 European teams, they have a okay first team, **** poor squad though, and don't get me started on their manager. Bit like Scotland last year to be honest.
As for The Premiership being the best league in the world, well for my money La Liga mops the floor with it each and every week. After that I'd take Serie A, the Premiership, Bundesliga and the Eredivise
You want to go a bit further than that!Quote:
Originally Posted by Lim till i die
Honestly I don't think any of the major European leagues give a toss about the UEFA Cup, as my younger Blackburn supporting brother said, the only downside of Blackburn progressing in the FA Cup is that they might end up having to play in the UEFA Cup againQuote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
We're comparing the English league here to the likes of the Swiss, Dutch, Turkish, Russian, Serbian leagues, not the bigger leagues (i.e. England, Spain, Germany, Italy). The point being made is that players with "second rate" clubs like Red Star, CSKA, Basel, Lens and Trabsonzpor are better than players at the English clubs. So it's irrelevant whether the top four leagues care that much about the UEFA, apart from that it might even reflect better on the English league if their clubs don't care and are doing well.
Right, well then I'll back out because I'm not comparing the Premiership to any of those leaguesQuote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
Fair enough.
The earlier point was that we had 11 players in the Premiership, which not many national teams could manage. It was then mentioned that European clubs (the ones I mentioned) are more technically adept than the Premiership and so, even though we're one of few countries who can field an XI entirely from the top flight in England, Spain, Italy and Germany, we still shouldn't expect to be near the top ten in Europe.
Which English clubs??Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple stu
If we're talking about the lower to mid-table teams Ireland cull most of their superstar squad from then yes players at the above clubs (Ok maybe not Basle and Trabzonspor) are of a higher quality
The point I was trying to make origionally (granted I made an ar$e of putting it across) is that players are coached far better on the continent than they are by the British/Irish model
If you take two fifteen year olds of equal ability and bring one up through the European system and one up through the British system I guarentee you the continental trained one will become a better more rounded player.
Therefore IMO as long as Ireland persist with British coaching methods they should have no right to expect to be ahead of similar sized nations (eg Serbia) where coaching from grass roots up is far superior
I know that it's trendy to say La Liga is the best league in the world. But there is absolutely no evidence for this. All the evidence from this year is that the Premiership is more succesful. There may be some argument about 'technical quality' (I'm not entirely sure what people means by this but I suspect it means ball control). Happily football is all about results and on that basis the Premiership is far more succesful.Quote:
Originally Posted by jebus
One argument is that the best Spanish teams are better than those in England. This holds no water this season. The big 2 in Spain are in a slump and Sevilla may win the league. But does anyone really think Sevilla are better than Chelsea or Man Utd. (Would they wipe the floor with them?)
The next argument is that the next 4/5 teams are better (more strength in depth). I'd say the next 4-5 teams in Spain are clubs like Osasuna, Espanyol etc. Are they really better than Tottenham, Bolton or Reading. There's not much evidence here, especially if you believe the UEFA Cup is not taken seriously. But I would be very doubtful that Espanyol would wipe the floor with Tottenham week in and week out.
Maybe the lower placed teams are better. Are Levante or Gimnastic better than West Ham or Charlton. This is even harder to argue as they never play each other and we know hardly any of the Spanish players but I would say that I'm not sure Ian Harte would be starting at any Premiership club.
So I cant really see any La Liga team wiping the floor with their equivalent in England.
Yeah me and my scenester mates hang out clicking our fingers to La Liga coverage every night :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by cavan_fan
As for your points about the Premiership teams being better than La Liga, well thats just your opinion on them. Personally I think Valencia are the best team in Europe this season, followed by a Barcelona team in decline, but again thats just opinion.
Now whilst Spain hasn't covered itself in glory in this years Champions League (one bad year does not a bad league make by the way) neither has England. People who actually watched the second round ties instead of just looking at the results in the paper would have seen that United were poor in both legs against a weak Lille side, Chelsea scraped through against a Porto team who are nothing like their Champions League winning side, Arsenal were put out by an average PSV side, and Liverpool played good defensive football to knock out a Barcelona side, riddled with infighting and problems, on away goals. Not exactly the results needed to place the Permiership at the summit of football if you ask me.
Domestically then you go out and insult Sevilla, by saying they are only there because Barca and Real are a mess at the moment. Have you actually watched them play? They are playing some good stuff at the moment and deserve to be top of that league (or near the top, they've actually fallen to second at the moment). And while we're at it, why do you see competition as a sign of weakness in a league? You go on about Spurs and Bolton being stronger than Espanyol (which isn't really apt by the way, what about Atletico Madrid, Deportivo, Villareal, Betis?), but then why can they never push on for the title? Why is it that Sevilla are able to challenge Barca and Real, but in England no-one ever comes close to challenging for the title other than Arsenal, United and Chelsea? The fact that Villareal, Sevilla, Depor, etc. have in recent times is a sign of strength in depth, not of weakness. Would you not rather have a competitive league where there is 9 points between the top seven teams, or would rather have one where there is nine poitns between the top 2?
And finally, if you look at the relegation area in both leagues you'll find Watford (hopefully will never darken the Premier's doorstep again), West Ham (shockingly poor team by anyone's standards), and Charlton (see West Ham), whereas in Spain we have Bilbao, Sociedad and Gimnastic, three teams still in with a shout of pulling out of it, and three teams that, if you watched them play, would waltz through the defences of West Ham, Charlton and Watford. But again thats just opinion :)
we could argue until the end of time what league is the best league. the fact is that after the big 4 in the premiership the league is very average. fair enough people are talking about the UEFA cup but that is a seriously poor competition at the moment with all the top teams in europe in the CL. yes, middlesborough got to the final last year - but even then they got hammered. celtic got to the final a few years ago and the dark side are still in this years competition so does that make the SPL a high standard league? no.
and if our players were really that good would they not be playing for the top teams in the premiership and not the padding? there is a reason why robbie keane plays for spurs and not man utd. why duff went to newcastle and not liverpool. personally it smacks of a lack of ambition to me. no willingness to test yourself at a really top club. secure the paypacket and to hell with winning trophies. a hunger and a drive to achieve the top honours are trademarks lacking in our international footballers today. these traits, combined with ability, are what make truly top footballers. you can have all the ability in the world but if you are not willing to fight for a place at a really top team you will never be a great player merely a talented one - matt le tissier anyone???
Chelsea would not sell him to Liverpool - they took a vastly reduced price from Newcastle precisely to avoid him ending up at Liverpool ... the Newcastle chairman actually thanked Chelsea at the press conference!!Quote:
Originally Posted by galwayhoop
As for other points raised in this thread about the English PL - Liverpool won the CL in 2005 and Arsenal reached the final a year later. Couple that with the success of English clubs this year and it really is abundantly clear that in Europe at least the English league is the strongest right now. The Spanish League has dipped from several years ago when Barca, Real Madrid, Valencia etc were a lot lot stronger than they are now; the Italian league is still recovering from the fall-out from the match fixing and they have serious off the field problems there as well which will take years to properly sort out. The Germans have one decent side - Bayern Munich. Werder Bremen, who are probably the second strongest side there, didn't get out of their group in the CL (which included Chelsea who finished top btw).
I can't see how anyone could argue there is a stronger league in Europe right now than in England.
Have to pull you big time thereQuote:
Originally Posted by galwayhoop
One of the all time great English players
Had a little known quality called loyalty.
It's shameful how few England caps he got
no, Karlos with a KQuote:
Originally Posted by carloz
He basically argued that there would be no more merit in appointing keane than staunton .....I know which one most Ireland fans would want now...
accept owlsfan who seems to think we should be happy in our mediocrity....
If you're going on results than tell me, in the last ten years how many times have an English side won the European Cup, now tell me how many times a Spanish side has?Quote:
Originally Posted by Emmet
Which country is the trophy currently being held?
If you're going on quality of football, than I'df seriously suggest you watch Sky's La Liga coverage a bit more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Billsthoughts
A bit of a difference there Bill. No harm in a bit of accuracy now and again.Quote:
Originally Posted by Billsthoughts
I don't remember you being around for this thread to argue any point, the same one
that Karlos contributed this to, referring to coaching credentials.
Quote:
The fact remains, I've yet to see any credential that would entitle Roy to get the job ahead of any of the other prospective managers. He has as much chance as anyone else to get it but he is NOT more qualified or more entitled to the job than anyone else. If Aldo and Stan aren't good enough (and i believe that,) then neither is Roy.