I'm not trying to argue with you Dodge but evidence was given and accepted at the tribunal that Pats approached Paisley before they approached Longford. Longford were approached by Pat's chairman on deadline day, two to three weeks after Paisley said "I want to go to Pats" to his manager,his reasons were "not about the money, for football reasons". Again, this was direct evidence given to the tribunal and not challenged by Paisley's reps. Tapping happens all the time but it should at least be acknowledged that it happened. Longford and Pats have always had a good relationship as clubs and I'm sure that won't change but ye or at least your manager contacted Paisley before the club were contacted. That is a stone cold fact.
11/03/2007, 11:23 PM
Dodge
Fair enough Longfordian. You'd know better than i would
11/03/2007, 11:26 PM
Longfordian
Fair enough, as Bill would say "we'll leave it there so". I like Paiso, he's a nice guy and a very good defender, it's just hard to swallow losing him for nowt when he wasn't owed anything.
