Originally Posted by patsh
I have read and quoted what you posted as it was written.
Your very first post was attacking Dolan for making excuses for not winning, the excuse you pointed out in particular was "training facilities".
I simply said that he never claimed that training facilities were the reson we did not win anything.
You have completely ignored this point, and the rest of your posts were long rants about all the things Dolan should have done, how you think he is an un-professional manager and a PR/soundbite person.
I have never objected to your opinion about Dolan or what you think he should have done, I have simply pointed out, again and again, that he NEVER used training facilities as an excuse for anything. He was asking a rheyorical question as to whether these would have made a difference. However, you have used that section of the interview to attack him again and again.
I haven't missed the point of your anti-Dolan rant at all, you are just choosing to see what you want to see in my posts, much the same as you choose to interpret the Dolan interview in such a way as to suit your own agenda.