You have to laugh at all those affronted by the fact that City have 1928 on their new crest.
They're the type of dull arses who would write into their local paper in irate personal angst if a journalist made the error of referring to black as a colour.
To those clowns with their g-strings in a twist over this issue, I have one simple thing to clarify. You do realise that our club fell off the face of the footballing earth for 13 years before returning to play in a new league and state, since when it has been referring to 1928 in its crest without you suffering such affrontery ? It's only 25yrs later when the club ends one season with one limited company and starts another with a different limited company - all the while maintaining continuity of kit, stadium, manager, players (obviously not all) and fans that you find it such an affrontery. So cheer up ya boring arses, and go cry about something else somewhere else.
Talk about feeble faux affrontery...... :o
