Fair enough
What are those minor concerns?
Printable View
Fair enough
What are those minor concerns?
I'm sure Tom Coughlan is telling supporters at the CCOSC Fans Forum as I write.
You'll find out tomorrow no doubt.
Acording to the Irish Times this morning:
Quote:
Though Cork City secured a Premier Division licence, they still have arrangements regarding outstanding payments to players and former manager Alan Mathews to fulfil before the start of the season. ................
“Cork have until February 27th in terms of their financial accounts.
Thats in the star and sun as well.Its not rumours as Delaney is quoted talking about Cork,Athlone,Kildare and Dundalk.
What is Delaney quoted as saying about us?Quote:
Originally Posted by gufct
There is not way that should be part of licencing. That is a legal dispute & not simple a case of failing to pay wages. If say City wanted to solve via legal route there is little chance could complete in time.Quote:
Though Cork City secured a Premier Division licence, they still have arrangements regarding outstanding payments to players and former manager Alan Mathews to fulfil before the start of the season. ................
Well the idea behind it is that clubs won't have any "footballing debts" so things like outstanding transfer fees are included as well as wages
Fair enough, but the point being as of now we dont owe Mathews anything because of sacking him. He can go to court to say we unfairly broke his contract, we'l disagree and itl be a judge that decides what is owed to who.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dodge
Sorry, thought pete was refering to the 2 players owed money too
Quote:
Originally Posted by micls
Player Debts and Audited Accounts.Athlone & Cobh Player Debts,Dundalk Pitch & then unamed Clubs about there unrealistic Budgets 4 singled out as per his interview on TV 3 were along the lines of the Herald Article easily identifiable as Bohs,Cork,Sligo & Drogheda.
In terms of last year's budgets or the proposed ones for this year?Quote:
Originally Posted by gufct
Hope this goes Matthews way as he had a contract and it should have been honored all this malarkey about contracts under arkaga aren't viable is a load of bull.Still cant see why Tom Coughlan sacked Matthews for Doolin:mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by micls
This year's proposed budgetsQuote:
Originally Posted by Smurf1
proposed ones for this year he said he was very sceptical and with the accusation in the Herald yesterday of under the table cash payments to circumvent the licencin process it looks like some clubs havent learned any lessons from last seasons debacle.You cant base your budget on hoped for success because our last 3 premier winners have all faced meltdown despite their success.
Yeah thats just what the club needs alright to be paying out 300k...Quote:
Originally Posted by corkboy360
Then why would they have approved them :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Dodge
Pressure on them to keep some sort of league together I'd assumeQuote:
Originally Posted by micls
Its not but Tom Coughlan being a businessman should of had th cop on not too sack someone with a 3 year contract with 2 remaining.Quote:
Originally Posted by micls
Irrelevant. Id expect any city fan to hope the court sides with us and we dont have to pay out that money.Quote:
Originally Posted by corkboy360
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dodge
I wouldnt have a problem with keeping the league together but if their budgets are unrealistic make them cut them or relegate them .Then licencing would be seen to work and not the absolute joke its held up to be.
Thats not right micls .OUR manager Alan matthews has been hard done by and deserves what he is owed .Unless of course he agrees on a settlement .Quote:
Originally Posted by micls