Originally Posted by
tricky_colour
As you point out he did not "get away with it" because no foul was committed as he did get a touch on the ball.
The ref must have good eyesight if he saw the touch, however I fancy he saw neither a touch or a foul, I didn't see the foul first time round.
I could hardly believe my eyes when I saw the enlarged slow motion, look like a clear cut peno, and 'lucky to get away' with it.
I think it just goes to show how your eyes can be deceived, but rather than being lucky I see it as good judgement.
So as I say, sign him up!!