The situation in the ROI is that DG (with his Irish passport) once registered on the Register of Electors can vote in all elections here.
If David Healey (resident in ROI, presumably with only a British passport) is registered on the ROI Register of Electors, cannot vote in ROI Presidential elections or in Referenda (and we have a fair few here, as with a written Irish Constitution, the only way it can be changed is by Referenda (unlike in the UK, where Westminster can pretty well make it up as they go along).
To be very clear on this, Gibson can vote in these 2 elections if resident & registered in the ROI that Healy cannot with only his British passport (also resident & registered).
Mary McAlease (born in Belfast and resident in NI at the time), and Dana (born in Derry and resident in the US at the time) were eligible to put themselves forward for the highest office in the ROI (the Presidency), I'm having difficulty swallowing the extra residential rule you want for DG to be able to represent ROI on the football pitch!Quote:
If Gibson were resident in the ROI, we wouldn't be having this whole footballing eligibility debate in the first place! That's my whole point.
Healy can move to wherever he likes. And he if he could persuade that Government to grant him citizenship, after two years he can represent that country at football. So could Gibson. (Yes, I know they're already tied to NI and ROI, but you get my point).