No, I don't think Rosegreen will get as much stick as Rock Rovers did for a number of reasons.
1. Rosegreen simply could not fulfil the fixture as they didn't have enough registered players available to do so. They had something like 9 players injured or away at the weekend (it was a bank holiday weekend remember), so they could not field a team.
2. The likliehood was, that even if they had fielded a team, they were unlikely to beat Clonmel Town, and therefore felt that giving a walkover was unlikely to change the overall outcome
3. This was a cup game, and as such the result had no immediate impact on any other team aside from the teams involved. Rock Rovers giving walkovers to teams in the league is a different matter. For example, they played and drew with Cashel Town, but gave a walkover to Clonmel Town. Clonmel Town now have 15 points, and Cashel have 11, a difference of 4 points. Had for example they played and drew with Clonmel and given Cashel a walkover, both teams would now be on 13 points.. so by giving walkovers in the league, they can have effects on other teams, and possible promotion/relegation places
4. The biggest gripe I think most people had with Rock Rovers on the weekend that they gave the walkover, was that they also fielded a B team on the same weekend. If they have enough players to field a B team, then these players should have played with the A team, and perhaps given the walkover in the lower league game. Surely the higher up team should take precedence?