John O'Shea booked after 9mins for a foul on Long. Ten mins later, O'Shea clearly trips Long and Long is booked for diving. I don't really think it was worthy of a second yellow for O'Shea but it was definitely a free kick.
Printable View
John O'Shea booked after 9mins for a foul on Long. Ten mins later, O'Shea clearly trips Long and Long is booked for diving. I don't really think it was worthy of a second yellow for O'Shea but it was definitely a free kick.
Just scored..unreal mistake from mignolet. Great poaching goal though
Long's goal against Sunderland:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xvc...om=embediframe
What a howler by Mignolet!
Al Habsi's was worse!
Al Habsi was shocking, he has got to get between the goal and the ball and then it can't go in, hard to believe he is a keeper.
reading the article in the independent. today Clarke definitely. doesn't. seem happy with trap. think trap knew well what he was doing as well....
Yes indeed, Trap deliberately and with malice, outed the lie because it would protect him from any further scrutiny over not playing Long :rolleyes:
Clarke needs to grow up about it, he sounds like he's on a long whining road about it. So what, he has a player who is carrying an injury susceptibility, something that nobody would have bothered about until Long said, injury! what injury!
The more Clarke goes on about it, the more I question his maturity.
unless of course he thinks by highlighting the issue he fends off potential suitors even by devaluing him.....but ya its a wonder why he is still going on about it.
He is not a good goal keeper, he may be good at some aspect of goal keeping but clearly he has
a fundamental problem with judgement of risk, I'm mean his attempt to save that, wel I it's the sort
of attempt I would expect from a 5 year old girl, and that is being disrespectful to most 5 year old girls!!!
Here is another blunder
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESPz-Y6GV5s
You won't find Shay Given doing either!!
No doubt al hasbi will be adding more blunders to his collection over the years.
Rested tonight at Swansea and already they're 3-0 down. Talisman.
They're managing his injury, which Steve Clarke keeps reminding us nobody would know about if Trapattoni hadn't blabbed about it. Two games in 3 days would have been too risky. I assume he was only on the bench in case someone else got injured.
Fair enough, I guess it makes him look better when they lose without him.
I don't know why Clarke is so annoyed about Trap mentioning it. He'd look far worse if people thought he was inexplicably dropping his star striker when he's in peak form.
Thats a good point charlie and the press would have been asking him about it over and over... He is making a mountain out of a molehill IMO.
Long linked with Liverpool. Don't think it would be a great move as he could easily end up benchwarming rather than getting a game. Also, Liverpool aren't the most stable of clubs, management wise.
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/football/...or-Shane-Long/
Seem pretty stable to me. Rodgers seems to be working it now.
If he goes to Liverpool and is working up top with Suarez that would be wonderful.
Id like to see him get WBA into the CL first. ;-)
I wouldn't read too much into this. Every half decent striker in the league is gonna be linked to Liverpool in the coming weeks.
Long would suit Liverpool down to a tee. Rodgers is banning the punt, and it's working to a point, as they are playing some excellent football, but they miss a poacher - about the only thing Suarez isn't - and if they were to get Long, they'd have a strong, very quick, poacher up top, supported by Suarez and one of Sterling/Gerrard/Suso. Shane is good enough to play top right as well, if they go with Borini or horse up front as the 1.
Could be a massive move for both him and Liverpool.
I think it would be mad for a club in Liverpool's current situation to pay a hefty fee for a striker with a dodgy leg.
But clubs like Liverpool do have a history of madness.
May I mark exhibit one; a Mr Alberto Aquilani...
I hope Long doesn't move to Liverpool as I feel Irish players have not fared well when they have been at bigger clubs. Gibson, Dunne, Given, Keane and Duff would probably have mixed feelings about their time at these clubs. In terms of Liverpool, their attack is built around Suarez and if it didn't work out, Long could find himself on the bench or facing another transfer like Carroll. I mentioned instability before at Liverpool, and what I meant by that was once things start to go wrong, the manager gets the chop. Then the new manager tries a new approach and on it goes.
For me, Long is playing well at WBA and is getting regular gametime, which in turn is good for Ireland,so I will just agree to disagree with some of you!
Why would Duff have mixed feelings about his time at Chelsea? Dunne left City before they could be considered a big club.
I disagree with you gastric. I feel it is essential that our players are playing at top clubs like Liverpool or United. For example, I would like to see over the next 12 months, Jamie McCarthy getting a move to one of the top 6 or 7 premiership clubs, in order to further his development. Otherwise, he will just stay a good decent premiership player, rather than get to a level where he could become top class (he has the potential to be really top class I would feel). I do partly agree that Liverpool is in the early stages of Rodgers' tenure and that the club is a massive work in progress, but I think that the Liverpool board will give him time, barring a disastrous run of results. From having lived in Liverpool for a number of years, Long is very highly rated by pretty much all my old Kopite and Evertonian mates. Those same mates were very sceptical about the signings of Carroll and Downing. I think that Long would be a great addition to Liverpool, although I would feel that they need an out and out goalscorer like a Huntelaar most of all.
Liverpool aren't a top club anymore. A big club, sure - a top club, no.
I'd love to see him at a true top side, he'd be a star.
Duff never got the amount of game time at Chelsea that he deserved, to me it was as much about stopping him going somewhere else as seeing the potential in him. Secondly, City were beginning to buy whoever they liked when they decided to get rid of the man who had lead them so admirably over the previous four years. No loyalty there!
Duff was fairly vital to Mourinho's title wins and Champions League runs. If anything, he wanted to get away because the pressurised environment didn't suit him, but he never let himself down.
I wasn't being disparaging about Duff's time at Chelsea, however, he did not get the game time he deserved particularly when Robben joined. As regards the 'pressurised environment' comment you made, Duff left as he was finding it hard to get a regular game, a situation not helped by the amount of injuries he seemed to pick up at that time.
Carragaline may have got it exactly right according to this report!
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...-for-sale.html
It depends how you view what constitutes a top club. Obviously, having a top class team would be a major factor, but for me history and pedigree go a long way.
Liverpool and the two Milans have had some of the greatest players and club teams of all time. They are among the best supported clubs in the world - maybe less so the two Milan teams outside Europe in this regard. If you go to Shanghai or Bratislava, Montivideo or Oslo, Liverpool are a huge club with a fanbase that far far exceeds Man City, Chelsea, Anzhi or PSG. You don't build that overnight.
It definitely wasn't due to lack of games - he played more often at Chelsea than he has at any other club, including Blackeye Rovers. As I remember it his injury problems only became chronic once he joined Newcastle.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damien_Duff#Club_2
Dunne left before City became they a top club but was the fans player of the year he left if I'm not mistaken. Given moved about 5 years too late and was on the decline by the time he moved. Duff had a very good record at Chelsea he and Robben were excellent in the 2004/2005 season. Gibson probably stayed at United for too long but looks like a good player in a decent Everton side. Keane though had a bad time at Liverpool and his last spell at Tottenham but still managed to score a few goals.
I think Long has all the attributes to do well at most clubs and his record over the last two seasons against the top teams speaks for itself.
Statistics, statistics, statistics! Charlie, how many of these games were starts as distinct from substitute appearances? Duff was injured quite a bit in 2006 and his form had begun to dip according to posters on his thread on here. It was quite a surprise when he joined Newcastle, in fact one poster referred to them as a basket case. Maybe it's time to agree to disagree on this subject?
All that comes under the auspices of being a big club in my opinion. Being a top club is very different in my opinion and based on recent form. Manchester United, Citeh and Chelsea are the top clubs in England right now. Reliance solely on history and pedigree means a team is currently irrelevant and living on its past.